All of that is true. But Scorsese's intention to make us feel that Jake is entitled to some sort redemption/salvation - he has hit rock bottom etc. - is made very clear. I said in my reply that how one feels about this is a subjective response. It's a very Scorsese thing - Travis Bickle. Henry Hill. And it's a very Catholic thing. In Scorsese's world there are some characters that are possibly beyond redemption - Joe Pesci's characters in Goodfellas and Casino for example. There is no debate that Jake Lamotta is a malignant brute and a corrosive Category 5 hurricane of toxic masculinity. He is also allowed to crawl out of his self made hell hole to salvage what remains of his humanity.Well, I think it's debatable because Scorsese's intention just doesn't work for me. There is a difference between being at peace with what a person did to himself and his family versus what I call personal redemption. A filmmaker is a storyteller, but how other people interpret that story could be different than what the storyteller intended.
Last edited: