What's new

WHV Press Release: The Lord of the Rings Trilogy (Blu-ray) (3 Viewers)

Ron-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
6,300
Real Name
Ron
Originally Posted by Luisito34

The EE are scheduled to be released by the end of 2012. The world is supposed to end by then, isn't it? Personally, I'm sufficiently happy with the current ultimate editions that I don't have to breathlessly wait two years for a Blu-ray to roll around.
If it's only 2012, I can wait. I wonder if they'll try and release these with the theatrical or Blu-ray release of "The Hobbit"?
 

LarryH

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 5, 2000
Messages
557
Wow! My Amazon order is still in effect, so it will have taken two weeks short of one year to have had it filled!
 

Jeff Robertson

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 4, 2000
Messages
504
Real Name
Jeff Robertson
That's good to know. It would be nice to have the theatrical and extended versions of LOTRs on the same discs.


Originally Posted by Brian Borst

King Kong, another Peter Jackson movie, managed to fit the original and the extended versions of it with seamless branching on the same disc. That's roughly 200 minutes, plus an audio commentary, the U-Control and DTS-HD MA audio. As I understand it, Dolby TrueHD takes less room, so it should be done easily for the extended editions of the Lord of the Rings movies.
 

Sean Bryan

Sean Bryan
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
5,945
Real Name
Sean
Are people saying 2012 for the extended editions just because that is when The Hobbit hits theaters?

Has there been any official statement that it would be that long (almost 3 years)? The only thing I saw in this press release was that the EE's would be released at a "later date".

Just wondering if I missed something.
 

Steve Christou

Long Member
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2000
Messages
16,333
Location
Manchester, England
Real Name
Steve Christou
A shame we have to wait for the EE's but I'll be buying these too, it's only money and I want to see what they look like in 1080p hi-def. The LOTR trilogy are my favourite films of this decade, nothing else comes close.


On April 6, 2010, renowned animator Ralph Bakshi's literal adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's classic fantasy trilogy, The Lord of the Rings animated version will be released in an all-new Deluxe Edition on Blu-ray Disc for the first time and newly remastered with new Dolby 5.1 audio and newly created extra content.
Wahay, my precioussss!
 

Carlo_M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 31, 1997
Messages
13,392
I'm also in the "I'll buy both" category assuming:

1. The street price on release date is reasonable. I see that Amazon's price is $68.99 but I'm hoping it will dip down to about $60. With largely no new extras, I think $20 per movie is fair. Especially since another release is forthcoming.
2. A/V quality is outstanding. As someone else pointed out: no EE/DNR.

What would absolutely make this a sweet deal is if they offer some sort of rebate like they did with the regular/EE DVDs. If the price of the sets is reasonable I won't complain if there's no rebate. But if the $68.99 price holds, and assuming the EE BDs will cost more, then I would hope they give us repeat buyers the opportunity for a rebate.

Also, I hope PJ goes in and re-CGI's Gollum in Fellowship to match Gollum in Two Towers and Return of the King. Preferably in both theatrical and extended cuts, but at the very least do it for the extended cuts (if the point of the theatrical BDs is to preserve exactly the theatrical experience).
 

Douglas Monce

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
5,511
Real Name
Douglas Monce
Originally Posted by Man-Fai Wong

I've said it before, and I'll say it again.

I actually hope PJ will redo the EE version to give us something truly better. While I do love seeing most of the stuff added back into the EEs, I do also think the pacing and such have been thrown off a bit w/ the EEs as they are right now -- plus PJ really blew it by adding the one small scene that essentially ruins the suspense for the subsequent ending of the battle at Minas Tirith (even though we all know by now how things play out).

_Man_
I have to agree with this. While I think the EE of Fellowship is generallyhttp://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oGky4dH...R3BJto0Gt3lRBDAAAAA%40%40&fr2=sp-qrw-corr-top a better film than the theatrical, I don't think the EE adds much to Two Towers (isn't better or worse) and the EE of Return of the King distroys the pacing and is WAY too long.

Having said that, and while I loved these films when they were first released, I find that I haven't watched them in years and have no real desire to watch them again. I doubt seriously that I will buy them one more time. They have lost their luster for me.

Doug
 

DaveF

Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
28,772
Location
Catfisch Cinema
Real Name
Dave
As a new Blu Ray owner, I'm intrigued. But I've not watched the movies since the first time at the Theater, and I never saw the Ext. Eds. So maybe this will be rental; to re-enjoy without having to spend a C-note.
 

Michael Osadciw

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
1,460
Real Name
Michael Osadciw
Like Apocalypse Now, I prefer the theatrical edition of Fellowship of the Ring - much better film! I'll be waiting in line for these!
 

davidcarroll01

Auditioning
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
2
Real Name
david carroll
When the extended version came out, I had a 21" TV and used the DVD as an excuse to upgrade the TV and the DVD player. Then I tried hooking the sound out to my old Sansui system that I bought in the early 70s while overseas. That was so good that I figured it was a good excuse to upgrade the speakers and add a sub. Then I went to a new receiver but moved on quickly to separates. That sounded so good that I treated the room with bass treatment and early reflection treatment.

I'm not sure I'll be able to afford the Hobbit if it's done better than the LOTR trilogy. I want the LOTR triology in blue ray extended version.
 

davidcarroll01

Auditioning
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
2
Real Name
david carroll
When the extended version came out, I had a 21" TV and used the DVD as an excuse to upgrade the TV and the DVD player. Then I tried hooking the sound out to my old Sansui system that I bought in the early 70s while overseas. That was so good that I figured it was a good excuse to upgrade the speakers and add a sub. Then I went to a new receiver but moved on quickly to separates. That sounded so good that I treated the room with bass treatment and early reflection treatment.

I'm not sure I'll be able to afford the Hobbit if it's done better than the LOTR trilogy. I want the LOTR triology in blue ray extended version.
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,241
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
I received my review copy yesterday. I have a couple of titles in the hamper before this, but thought I would at least confirm the specs for anyone interested.

Audio is DTS-HD MA 6.1 English on all titles. FotR has a DD2.0 Spanish dub. TT and RotK have DD5.1 EX Spanish Dubs.

The set contains 3 BDs, 3 SD DVDs, and 3 DVD-ROMs.

The BDs for each title have the film as well as high-def versions of the same theatrical trailers that appeared on the second discs of the previous SD DVD releases of the theatrical versions. All three BDs also include the "mega-trailer" in high def as well as trailers for two forthcoming LOTR-based video games. They all have access to the Warner BD-Live Portal as well, although there is no specific LOTR content beyond the ability to have screening events for the movies at this time.

The three SD DVDs have the same content as the second discs of the previous theatrical cut DVD releases of each film minus the video game promos, the DVD-ROM stuff, and the trailers (which are on the BDs in high definition). I confirmed that everything else is present,

The three DVD-ROMs are simply the digital copy discs for each film which are compatible with iTunes or Windows Media.

The digital copies are bound in their own standard sized blu-ray case with a hinged tray allowing for the accomodaton of three discs with no overlapping. There is a paper insert in this case with a directory of the contents of all of the discs.

The BDs and SD DVDs are in a "fat" blu-ray case with two double-sided hinged trays alowing for the accomodatiion of six discs with no overlapping.

Both blu-ray cases fit in a thick cardboard box that "pulls the whole thing together."

Regards,
 

Jeff Cooper

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2000
Messages
3,016
Location
Little Elm, TX
Real Name
Jeff Cooper
Audio is DTS? Just curious since the original press release on this thread and The Digital Bits review from today both only mention Dolby TrueHD.
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,241
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
Originally Posted by Jeff Cooper ">[/url]

Audio is DTS? Just curious since the original press release on this thread and The Digital Bits review from today both only mention Dolby TrueHD.
[/QUOTE]That's what it says in my notes, but I will verify this evening. At least bluray.com agrees with me.
 

Todd Erwin

Reviewer
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
10,450
Location
Hawthorne, NV
Real Name
Todd Erwin
It looks like DTS continues to gain market share on Blu-ray!!!!

Update: Colin's review of The Fellowship of the Ring over at DVDMG indicates DTS-HD MA as well. I'm pretty confident I got it right at this point.
 

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
13,328
Originally Posted by Ken_McAlinden

Definitely DTS-HD. I even checked that it displayed that on my receiver.

BTW: just checked, and the TDB review has been corrected to list DTS-HD...
 

PaulDA

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2004
Messages
2,708
Location
St. Hubert, Quebec, Canada
Real Name
Paul
Why does it matter? Lossless is lossless--whichever format they choose, the sound is identical to the source master (or it is supposed to be). Dolby TrueHD is more efficient, space-wise (this is NOT a comment on sound quality) so I can see it being preferred in some cases where films are especially long (which makes the LOTR movies a good candidate for TrueHD, frankly). Otherwise, it should be of interest only to stock holders of Dolby or DTS--not to listeners.
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,241
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
Originally Posted by PaulDA

Why does it matter? Lossless is lossless--whichever format they choose, the sound is identical to the source master (or it is supposed to be). Dolby TrueHD is more efficient, space-wise (this is NOT a comment on sound quality) so I can see it being preferred in some cases where films are especially long (which makes the LOTR movies a good candidate for TrueHD, frankly). Otherwise, it should be of interest only to stock holders of Dolby or DTS--not to listeners.
...or possibly to people with 1st gen players that cannot output DTS HD-MA as lossless PCM over HDMI. (I have since upgraded, but that is still the case with my secondary HT).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,063
Messages
5,129,881
Members
144,281
Latest member
papill6n
Recent bookmarks
0
Top