What's new

Warner's Kiss Me Kate Mis-Framed (1 Viewer)

Greg_M

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,189
The New Warner DVD of "Kiss Me Kate" claims to be the OAR in Full Screen. The last laserdisc release was letterboxed. I thought they just masked off the top and bottom but there is more information on the sides - a lot more. Some of the top and bottom were trimmed but not by much, it's too bad since the new DVD looks a bit crowded.

Don't understand what happened since the DVD was produced by the same guys who worked for MGM. So they know about the letterboxed version. I believe that version had a 1:78 Aspect ratio.

Why not release the letterboxed version?

Those looking to upgrade beware.
 

Patrick McCart

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 16, 2001
Messages
8,254
Location
Northern Virginia
Real Name
Patrick McCart
NaturalVision films were made for 1.33:1, so it must have been a mistake on the LD.

This film was released before MGM put out a widescreen film so far.
 

Greg_M

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,189
It may have been a mistake, but there is more side information in a direct comparison. Framing actually looks better on the LD though the DVD has more stability in the colors. Wouldn't have bought it if I knew.
 

Greg_M

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,189
Half the movie is not missing, but 2 - 4 inches on my 35 " set. Maybe 20%


The framing is all off, and the film doesn't look right. Wish I could return the Disc.:angry:
 

Joe Caps

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2000
Messages
2,169
Ann Miller was on TCM last year talking about the filming of this movie. She said the film was shot twice - once for 3d and once for the regular cameras. Greg is right - there is plenty missing on both sides of this transfer. Why did they do this?
 

Greg_M

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,189
I have A/B the DVD with the laserdisc, there are characters missing from some of the shots on the DVD. Some how I doubt this is the OAR from 1953. After all widescreen films were in release by this time (The Robe) I had read "KMK" was film to be masked for a wider screen (But not the sides!) "KMK" was also one of the first MGM films to feature Stereo Sound.

The laserdisc has much better framing. Someone screwed up.:frowning:
 

Patrick McCart

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 16, 2001
Messages
8,254
Location
Northern Virginia
Real Name
Patrick McCart
If it was filmed twice, that COULD mean the version on DVD comes from the flat version while the LD came from one of the two strips.

Or vice versa.

Add: never mind then (not filmed twice)


Is this with no overscan?
 

Greg_M

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,189
Doubtful since the 3-D version wouldn't have been used for the laser release.

My set is adjusted for overscan. Plus, I can see the opening credits are window boxed with wider bands on the top and bottom than on either of the sides.

I though it didn't look right so I got out the old laserdisc and was correct.



On the other hand, "Silk Stockings" looks very good. The color is back and the framing while tight (some feet get cut off, unusal in a Fred Astaire film) it seems to match the framing on the old Laserdisc. Get this one, skip "Kiss Me Kate"
 

Greg_M

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,189
Even if they used the 3-D version left or right - wouldn't one side have more information then another? On the laserdisc both sides have more information.
 

Peter Apruzzese

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 20, 1999
Messages
4,973
Real Name
Peter Apruzzese
Even if they used the 3-D version left or right - wouldn't one side have more information then another?
Very slightly, but not enough to cause what you're describing.

Any way you can post some screen shots between the laser and the DVD so we can see how much it's off?
 

Greg_M

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,189
I have no idea how to post screen shots from a laser disc.:frowning:

Sorry Dave, don't have a digital camera, maybe some one else will post a screen shot.
 

ScottR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2000
Messages
2,646
I've noticed a lot of Warner Bros. dvds that are more heavily cropped than their ld counterparts:

J.F.K.
Singin' in the Rain
Doctor Zhivago

...to name a few.
 

Roger Rollins

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 19, 2001
Messages
931
The aspect ratio of this film was 1.37:1 when shot, and released in its 3-D version. The letterboxed laserdisc did not reflect the intended aspect ratio when filmed.

This film was NOT shot twice, although it's understandable that the legend could be remembered that way by the participants.

I looked at the new DVD, and I think it's terrific. It is a bit more tightly framed on one side than the 1991 LD that I have, but has more information on the other side than that LD.

It's a great movie, and a great DVD. It looks terrific and sounds wonderful. It is also presented in the aspect ratio the director intended. Bravo to WB.

I have purchased the other Porter titles but haven't had a chance to pop 'em in yet. HIGH SOCIETY is next!
 

GerardoHP

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 10, 2001
Messages
799
Location
Los Angeles, California
Real Name
Gerardo Paron
I just bought 4 of the Cole Porter titles that came out today. My first impression on KISS ME KATE was that it was waaay too tight, and that the color (I think it was Ansco) looks a bit washed out at times. On the other hand, I'm way too picky about these things, so there you have it. STOCKINGS and HIGH SOCIETY look and sound terrific. I have the LD of STOCKINGS, which was very good, and the anamorphic DVD is a remarkable improvement over it if only in terms of the transfer. BROADWAY has more scratches than I would wish to find on it but the contrast and sharpness are great.
 

Greg_M

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 23, 2000
Messages
1,189
Quote:
"I looked at the new DVD, and I think it's terrific. It is a bit more tightly framed on one side than the 1991 LD that I have, but has more information on the other side than that LD."

Rodger,
I don't what laserdisc you are looking at, but MGM released a letterboxed version in the late 90's and there is more side information on BOTH sides. Your tv is probably over scanning on one side.

Quote: : "It is also presented in the aspect ratio the director intended."

I doubt very much that this is the correct OAR. Why would there be more information on another release if the film was shot 1:1.37. If that is the case there is more information missing from the top and bottom of the DVD too, since that much is missing from the sides.

And no, the laserdisc didn't represent the intended aspect ratio, because the top and bottom were cropped (But the sides did remain)

Quote: "Bravo to WB. "
It's hard to believe you like this transfer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,776
Messages
5,142,857
Members
144,478
Latest member
Successful Funds
Recent bookmarks
0
Top