What is wrong with this picture? Could it be that the glowing review of this pan-and-scan "special edition" DVD travesty of ANNIE appears in a magazine that purports to be for movie aficionados? That PREMIERE is supposed to serve as an authority for those seeking movie information? That it is meant to sort the crap from the quality and offer discriminating readers opinions based upon a deep knowledge of movies (and videos) and at the very least a healthy perspective on the correct presentation of said movies and videos? Guess PREMIERE has gone the way of most zines that have outlived their usefulness - it has become a forum for Joe Six Pack and can't even see the issue with recommending (with a four star rating for the disc) a chopped-up piece of video waste that perpetuates the myth of "bigger picture equals more of the image." I realize this review is the opinion of one man, but I would have thought a magazine like this one would at least educate the very people who work for it. Another scary example of what we're up against.