haineshisway
Senior HTF Member
The Warner DVD was, if memory serves, not bad, but I need to go find it and look at it again. It was open matte though.Robert Crawford said:Bruce,
Warner DVD or this BD release?
The Warner DVD was, if memory serves, not bad, but I need to go find it and look at it again. It was open matte though.Robert Crawford said:Bruce,
Warner DVD or this BD release?
That didn't bother me so much, but I was too distracted by the complete lack of detail. Glad others are seeing it - that reviewer is rather out of his mind.Persianimmortal said:I haven't received my copy yet, but just going by the screenshots it confirms what Bruce says regarding overzealous digital scrubbing. But of equal concern to me is that the contrast seems too high as well - whites are overblown. Bruce, or anyone else with the disc, any comments regarding the overall brightness?
haineshisway said:The Warner DVD was, if memory serves, not bad, but I need to go find it and look at it again. It was open matte though.
My mistake. I just took a post somewhere at their word - I have it here somewhere, will find it and compare. Actually I wrote about it on my blog in 2008. Guess that will be the only thing I ever need to view. I still want to compare it, so I'll find it today.Mark-P said:The 2008 Warner DVD (I have it) was 16X9 widescreen 1.78:1.
For those that don't know, Amazon is selling the 2008 DVD for less than $6.00Charles Smith said:Just ordered the Warner DVD.