MarkPayton
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Apr 15, 1999
- Messages
- 70
Here's a weird one:
I currently am running a 5 channel setup - no .1 'cuz I don't have a sub yet. I have Klipsch across the front 3 (RB-5s and an RC-3, of course set to large right now). The receiver is a Denon 3801. The surrounds are crap 15-year old Kenwoods, planning to upgrade to Klispch RS-3s. My first concern is to get some woofage into the system, and so I am considering the purchase of an SVS 20-39. I am on the fence about CS vs powered, and it comes down to this, for $50 more (PC is $749 vs $799 for CS with Samson if I read it right) I can have a separate amp and plenty of power, but what to do with the unused channel?
I do not have the need for 2 subs, nor the space, the HT/family room is less than 1600 cubic feet. And I believe I have read that it is not necessary nor even a good idea to bridge the Samson into one SVS.
So here's my thought - please tell me if I am being silly or about to blow something up...
If I buy the CS version with a Samson amp, could I use the amp in stereo mode to power the sub with channel one and the remaining channel two for... the center? What I am wondering is:
1) How well would the Samson deal with this imbalanced load?
2) Would this be too much power for the center to take?
Obviously lots of level-calibration would be required, but I am thinking this would be a neat way to ease the burden on the Denon and have more pure power for the RC-3 center (which I would also bi-wire).
Does anybody else do this? Am I heading for trouble to blow up my poor RC-3? Is the Samson overkill?
The other attraction of this setup would be that I could be using the Samson as much as possible now, but also have the capability to upgrade to 2 subs if in the future I move or build a separate HT...
Please let me know if this makes any sense...
------------------
I currently am running a 5 channel setup - no .1 'cuz I don't have a sub yet. I have Klipsch across the front 3 (RB-5s and an RC-3, of course set to large right now). The receiver is a Denon 3801. The surrounds are crap 15-year old Kenwoods, planning to upgrade to Klispch RS-3s. My first concern is to get some woofage into the system, and so I am considering the purchase of an SVS 20-39. I am on the fence about CS vs powered, and it comes down to this, for $50 more (PC is $749 vs $799 for CS with Samson if I read it right) I can have a separate amp and plenty of power, but what to do with the unused channel?
I do not have the need for 2 subs, nor the space, the HT/family room is less than 1600 cubic feet. And I believe I have read that it is not necessary nor even a good idea to bridge the Samson into one SVS.
So here's my thought - please tell me if I am being silly or about to blow something up...
If I buy the CS version with a Samson amp, could I use the amp in stereo mode to power the sub with channel one and the remaining channel two for... the center? What I am wondering is:
1) How well would the Samson deal with this imbalanced load?
2) Would this be too much power for the center to take?
Obviously lots of level-calibration would be required, but I am thinking this would be a neat way to ease the burden on the Denon and have more pure power for the RC-3 center (which I would also bi-wire).
Does anybody else do this? Am I heading for trouble to blow up my poor RC-3? Is the Samson overkill?
The other attraction of this setup would be that I could be using the Samson as much as possible now, but also have the capability to upgrade to 2 subs if in the future I move or build a separate HT...
Please let me know if this makes any sense...
------------------