Stephen Ford
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2002
- Messages
- 150
Jamie,
Set up your own anti FG thread then and see how empty it is.
No posts were deleted.
Set up your own anti FG thread then and see how empty it is.
No posts were deleted.
I'm on the waiting list for Volume 1 at the library. But based on all the overwhelming (and seemingly unanimous) praise, I was considering a blind purchase of Volumes 1+2 tomorrow. But now, thanks to Jaime's insights, I think I will be patient and wait to view the library's copy first.
Martin, good call. That's a smart thing to do.
Do me a favor -- be certain to check back in on
this thread and tell us what you thought of the
show once you see it.
I promise, we won't remove any comments
because they are negative
In what used to be post #40 here, before "the great disappearance"...It might be that some of the posts got lost when the forum was down at some point; I don't know. In any case I never thought, nor meant to imply, that anybody was deleting posts to "hype sales." I thought that someone might be deleting negative posts as unduly negative or "thread-crapping," and my argument would be that when a thread encourages people to buy something, it's legitimate (not thread-crapping) to offer an alternative opinion. This isn't a "Family Guy Appreciation Thread." (And of course if I start a thread telling people to buy a show I like, it's equally legitimate for someone to post to that thread and say, no, I think this show is no good and here's why I think that.)
i think in the afternoon it is on tbs or tnt.Yeah. It is on TBS at 2:30 PM eastern. It's also on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim at 11:00 PM eastern.
Jaime, what you call poor story structure, I call unconventional story structure. THat was one of the main things I loved about the show. You have about 10 minutes of plot, often inconsequential. The whole thing is just to set up a bunch of wacky gags and flashbacks.Well -- and this is purely a matter of personal taste, of course -- I have a hard time following the same characters for a whole half-hour, let alone a whole series, without more story interest than that. I just lose interest in a Family Guy episode very quickly because there's just nothing to make me care what happens to these people by the end of the first act, let alone by the end of the show. If it was a sketch comedy show with different characters in every act, or if it did three seven-minute short cartoons with these characters and called that a show -- but it uses the form of a sitcom and I kind of expect more story interest than I see in the show. I'll admit, though, that by the third season they seemed to have gotten a bit better at telling stories -- so maybe I'd have a different perspective on the show if it had run longer and the writers had achieved a better balance between gags and characterization.
This is, again, personal taste; I've just come to prefer sitcoms that are willing to sacrifice a gag or two and find comedy in the characters. That's why I've come to prefer the early seasons of The Simpsons (seasons 1 and 2) to many of the later seasons. Which is definitely an oddball opinion since a lot of people are of the opinion that that show didn't hit its stride until season 4 or so.
Ron, wait until you get around to Volume 2. "Screwed the Pooch" contains more gut-busting laughs in the first 8 minutes than most shows have in entire episodes, not to mention the rest of the episode.
Rob, I cheated tonight and put this episode on.
What a winner! Certainly one of the top 3 episodes
I have watched to date. Thanks for recommending it.
the entire point?Nothing, obviously, is wrong with a show that just makes you laugh... and if Family Guy made me laugh a lot, I wouldn't be grousing about it. But I really don't laugh much when I watch the show, and I think part of the reason for that is that the jokes aren't hanging on anything like story or characterization. Whereas with a King of the Hill or early Simpsons, which might not have as many jokes, I laugh more because there are so many things that are funny for other reasons than pop-culture referentiality or outrageousness. And I laugh more as the episode goes on and the story unfolds, whereas with Family Guy the best stuff often comes in the first act (with a falling-off in interest as the episode goes on and it becomes clear that there's no story). And Family Guy doesn't exactly have a huge variety of jokes (IMO). I don't think the cutaways are so brilliant as to justify their getting in the way of the story (I don't think they ever did a fantasy sequence that I found as funny as, say, Homer Simpson in the land of chocolate -- and that's partly because Peter is such an inexpressive character that he can't be animated funny like Homer can).
One last thing I'll say, and I'll stop the bashing (and I'm sorry if I seem to be hammering on the show, but obviously it's my problem and no one else's if I don't find it funny): What I find a little puzzling is that people will sometimes tell me that a) Family Guy is a great, brilliant show, and b) It's just mindless entertainment, the jokes are there for their own sake, and I shouldn't expect storytelling or caring about the characters. There are shows that I find funny even though I don't think they have good storytelling or characters I can really care about -- but I would never call them great shows. At most I'd call them guilty pleasures. I mean, part of the success of The Simpsons was in showing that an animated show could do more than just make people laugh, that it could also make people care, and do sharp, coherent satire. That makes for a great sitcom, I think.
That makes for a great sitcom, I think.Sorry for the cliche, but there's more than one way to skin a cat.
Obviously personal opinion factors largely into this so I don't think you can simply say X+Y=Great Sitcom.