kemcha
Second Unit
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 376
- Real Name
- Jaref
Category 6: Day of Destruction
The Core
Dante's Peak
On Deadly Ground (Steven Seagal)
The Core
Dante's Peak
On Deadly Ground (Steven Seagal)
Ken Burns films up through The War were shot in 16mm, and would likely not see much improvment in image quality on blu-ray. However yes loads of extras could be added.Originally Posted by mattCR
Ken Burns: Civil War (the potential for extras an on limited discs with high quality would be awesome)
I've never understood this mindset. Anything sourced from film can be improved by the higher video resolution of Blu-Ray. If you don't think so, check out the A&E Blu-Ray release of Pride & Prejudice, which is stunning. The Burns stuff needs to be remastered anyway. The DVD set of The Civil War is very bad, with judder and other movement in the images, not to mention visible dirt and sound distortions owing to poor mastering. It is actually painful to watch.Ken Burns films up through The War were shot in 16mm, and would likely not see much improvment in image quality on blu-ray. However yes loads of extras could be added.
Pride & Prejudice was photographed in Super16 which has quite a bit more image area, and there for more resolving power.Originally Posted by Joseph DeMartino
I've never understood this mindset. Anything sourced from film can be improved by the higher video resolution of Blu-Ray. If you don't think so, check out the A&E Blu-Ray release of Pride & Prejudice, which is stunning. The Burns stuff needs to be remastered anyway. The DVD set of The Civil War is very bad, with judder and other movement in the images, not to mention visible dirt and sound distortions owing to poor mastering. It is actually painful to watch.
I have written to PBS asking if there are any plans to revisit the Burns films and others of their documentaries. I certainly hope so, because from what I've seen 16mm can yield astonishing results when properly transferred to Blu-Ray.
Regards,
Joe
Yes it has a little more resolving power than NTSC, but not much more. As I said, there would be some improvement, but not hugely better. I've worked with both 16mm and super 16. Super 16 is as small as I would be comfortable going for something that would be presented in HD. Honestly at this point I'm no longer shooting film. I just don't see any advantage to it anymore.Originally Posted by Adam_S
NTSC is 720x486.
Even standard 16mm has more resolving power than that.
having seen some very nice 8mm footage transferred at HD and NTSC, I would say 8mm is closer to NTSC resolution, though it still has better image fidelity at HD resolutions because HD is better able to represent the grain, rather than the more smeared look the same footage has on NTSC.
Exactly. So the Burns films should gain at least as much from the process asWindowboxed 16mm (i.e., the 1.37:1 full 16mm frame centered within the 16:9 HD frame) should have the same resolving power as Super-16. The only difference is Super-16 is wider and thus has a native widescreen aspect ratio.
Originally Posted by Worth ">[/url]
[i]The Prisoner[/i] was shot on 35mm.[/QUOTE]
Yes, of course you're correct. Sorry. Had it on the brain from another discussion where people were arguing that "old TV and movies" and 1.33:1 sourced material would not benefit from Blu-Ray.
BTW, Florentine Films doesn't even publish an e-mail address or provide a contact or comments form on their site. If you want to ask them any questions, you have to use snail mail. This does not bode well for anyone over there being hot for Blu-Ray.