John Sullmeyer
Second Unit
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2001
- Messages
- 272
Does anyone know if there are any plans to release this film, or if this film has ever been released in any Region on DVD?
yes it is very offensive.The trashy parts notwithstanding, I thought it was effective in stripping away the genteel veneer that up to then had masked the brutality of the antebellum South.
RD
Susan George was soooooo good at on-screen sluttiness...Indeed!!
Good luck ever seeing this on R1 DVD from Paramount.
I'd like to see the look on Martin Blythe's face as he responds to queries for this and, yes, the Paramount-distributed "The Legend of Nigger Charley" and "The Soul of Nigger Charley" starring Fred Williamson. No, I'm not making those titles up. And yes, they came from Paramount.
Considering how PC some companies can get the best that can be hoped for, I think, is a release in another region other than R1. Or a DVD-R from acompany like Crimson Cult Video.
Maybe Dino ("I didnta wanta disappointa tha kidsa") de Laurentiis, the movie's producer,---or, more likely, his heirs, since he's ancient by now---would buy back the rights from them and distribute it through another, maybe less high-profile company.
I have the laserdisc somewhere, and I'd like to see a release of this film on DVD packaged with the Bill Murray / O.J. Simpson / Larraine Newman Saturday Night Live spoof sketch. How's that for "politically incorrect"?
One is hoky and the other is just a hoot. (Care to guess which one is which?)
How's that for "politically incorrect"?
Well, Dino was never known for good taste, now was he? The film essentially took the so-called "blaxploitation"---boy, do I hate that monstrosity of a word---trend "upscale" and let out all the stops: cultural taboos about black sexuality and the (supposed) relation of same to the American slavery institution. (In that way, it's quite close to the source material.)
The film basically reduces blacks to sex objects, whites to cartoonish villains obsessed with same, and then throws in those hoky phony "Suthe'n accents"---British people do them so poorly---mixed with bits of (for some) titillating überviolence, meant to provide a legitimizing cover for the luridity and baseness of the treatment of the subject matter.
The value of the movie, in my opinion, lies in what its popularity says about the public and general society of the time. It couldn't---or, rather, wouldn't---be filmed and released today, since the same old cultural taboos have come to reassert themselves (even if on the part of other vested interests with very different pretexts besides those of the usual proponents of the status quo).