I've probably said it before but at least Jaws III is a good bad movie so you can have some fun laughing at it. The Revenge is just a bad movie.
When I was young, I liked Jaws 2 and III more than the original because they've both got more action and more people getting eaten by a shark.
There's a few good things about Jaws III but yeah, the biggest reason that I will frequently end up watching it when it's on AMC is because it's silly.Jaws III was my jam when I was a kid. I still find it enjoyable and goofy to watch, but that's about all it has going for it now.
There's a few good things about Jaws III
As I said in the other JAWS thread, The POV death scene from inside the sharks mouth. Terrific.Name one. I dare ya!
Ha! The scene Tino mentioned is easily the best scene in the movie and legitimately creepy. The score, while certainly not up to John WIlliams, is still pretty good. Lou Gossett saying "You talking about some damn shark's mother?" makes me laugh. The scene with Overman trying to lock the underwater gate and the shot of the shark pushing against the gate is somewhat suspenseful. After that, it pretty much gets by on its goofiness or nostalgia with me.Name one. I dare ya!
Ha! The scene Tino mentioned is easily the best scene in the movie and legitimately creepy. The score, while certainly not up to John WIlliams, is still pretty good. Lou Gossett saying "You talking about some damn shark's mother?" makes me laugh. The scene with Overman trying to lock the underwater gate and the shot of the shark pushing against the gate is somewhat suspenseful. After that, it pretty much gets by on its goofiness or nostalgia with me.
It still bugs me that the sharks look progressively worse in each sequel, despite the massive advances in special effects technology between 1975 and 1987. I remember thinking that the Audrey II plant in Little Shop of Horrors looked better than the shark in Jaws the Revenge. You'd think after 12 years of shark research and effects technology, the shark would look and move better, but no.
The original Bruce had some problems, but those can be somewhat excused because it was made in a hurry based on the limited films and photos of live great whites that were available in 1974. Plus, the technology of animatronics was in its infancy. Given those limits, they did a great job.
Jaws 2 had the benefit of three years of special effects advances, plus many more photos and videos of sharks that had been taken after Jaws became a huge hit and made sharks into major stars in the public eye. The movie also had a much larger budget than Jaws. And yet they managed to make the shark look and move in a less realistic way. It just seemed like they weren't even trying to make the sharks look right.
Jaws 3D at least had some cool stuff with the shark baring its teeth, though the effect wasn't used very effectively, and the shark overall seemed slow and stiff compared to the previous sharks.
And Jaws the Revenge pretty much just used the same look as in the first two movies without any attempt to improve on the other sharks or make them move better. Plus, seeing the shark in long slow motion shots in broad daylight only emphasized how fake it looked.
I wouldn't see Jaws 2 for another 10 or 12 years, and I remember thinking it was okay, but not in a league with the first one.