What's new

HTF REVIEW: Bram Stoker's Dracula vs. Bram Stoker's Dracula (Superbits) (1 Viewer)

Ronald Epstein

Founder
Owner
Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 1997
Messages
66,794
Real Name
Ronald Epstein
Link Removed VS.
24014.jpg


Bram Stoker's Dracula

As far as I am concerned, the jury is still
out on this entire Superbits line of
DVDs recently introduced by Columbia/Tristar.
You can go from one review to another of the
same Superbits title and some will see
and hear a slight to remarkable difference while
others will notice no improvement whatsoever.
While my HTF REVIEW of the first batch of
Superbit titles found no improvement to
a slight improvement in video quality, I was
impressed with the improvement on the DTS audio
tracks. For that reason, I was a bit upbeat with
this new line of DVDs and was anxiously awaiting
the release of the next title, Bram Stoker's
Dracula.
While there have been countless movies made about
the legendary Transylvanian resident, none have
been as favored as much as this 1992 version based
more on Bram Stoker's classic novel of the same
name. Winning Oscars for costumes and makeup,
this film is craftily directed by Francis Ford
Coppola, with gorgeous photography and a stellar
cast that includes Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder,
Anthony Hopkins and Keanu Reeves. To this day,
Bram Stoker's Dracula remains the most
vivid, seductive and visually horrific tale about
Count Dracula ever brought to the screen.
Comparing the original 1997 DVD release and this
new Superbits release was a little
difficult. Though I have multiple DVD players,
I wanted these discs played from the same hardware
source. To do this, I hate to constantly load and
reload each disc to compare scenes, never quite
giving me an exact split screen eye on any specific
differences there might be. Nonetheless, I believe
I was able to do an adequate comparison.
First of all, it is apparent that the Superbit
release comes from the same master as the 1997
release. You can clearly see the same black splotches
across the Columbia Pictures logo on both transfers.
Starting with Chapter 2 (ST)/Chapter 1 (SB), I
studied the very first scene of the film where
Anthony Hopkins tells of the invading Muslim Turks.
This scene was photographed very soft and almost
with a muddy look. For that reason, there was grain
evident on both versions. The scene goes on to
Dracula (Oldman) leaving his bride, Elizabeth (Ryder)
to fight the war. The first time I watched the
first 10 minutes of this chapter on both discs,
I could not find any difference in video quality.
Upon studying further, I found that instead of an
overall improvement in picture quality, I found
little pieces of improvements. The armored hand
that raises a sword looks more 3-D like against the
map of Transylvania and Turkey. The images of
Dracula bidding his bride goodbye are ever so
slightly brighter and distinct.
The review becomes more difficult as I find that
chapters have been realigned and separated at
different points in this new Superbits version.
Chapter 8 (ST)/ Chapter 3 (SB) starts with a
red waxed seal on an envelope. Jonathan (Reeves)
is finalizing a document with the elderly count.
Both versions showed vivid red detail in the count's
long robe. Although again I could notice very
little difference in the picture quality between
the two discs, I did see a slight improvement in
the flesh tone of Keanu Reeve's face. Still, a
slight improvement.
Chapter 10 (ST)/ Chapter 3 (SB) starts with a
harp playing. We meet Lucy's (Sadie Frost) beau,
Quincy (Bill Campbell). Here, I actually did notice
a slight improvement in picture quality. On the
standard edition, the faces of the two beautiful
girls are less distinct compared to the Superbits
version where faces are cleaner, more distinctive,
and with more pronounced flesh tones. The color
of Quincy's light brown overcoat also stands out
more in the Superbits version.
Lastly, I jumped ahead to chapter 48 (ST)/ Chapter 23
(SB) where a carriage carrying Van Helsing (Hopkins)
and Mina (Ryder) through the snowy outskirts of the
castle. Again, I was hard pressed to find any great
differences in overall picture quality here except
for a slightly cleaner picture of the passengers
riding through the snow to the castle and its open
gates. Looking at Winona Ryder's face as she hastens
the horses to move forward, I could see slightly more
detail in her face on the Superbits version.
Audio Quality....
The original 1997 DVD release contained a 5.1
Dolby Digital Track while the Superbits
version adds a 5.1 DTS track.
The DTS track is recorded at a lower volume
than the Dolby Digital track. I had to turn
up the volume considerably when listening to the
DTS version. However, when I did, I found the
audio to sounder cleaner than its DD counterpart.
Though I didn't notice any addition or subtraction
of effects from either audio soundtrack, I did
immediately find that sounds are more effectively
divided amongst the channels in the DTS version.
Anthony Hopkin's narrative sounds more squarely
in the center, where it should be. Turning up
the volume did not distort any of the audio on
the DTS version and the overall result was a more
cleaner, natural surround environment.
Final Thoughts....
Whether there is a substantial improvement in
the picture quality of Superbits over its
standard counterpart, will not be something easily
agreed upon.
Show the discs back to back to someone off the
street and they will be hard pressed to notice any
changes.
Most of us on this forum with average Home Theater
systems will really have to study both discs scene
by scene to notice the slight improvements in picture
quality. It's more or less little things that are
brought out in the picture more than an overall
improvement in clarity.
High-end enthusiasts with front projection systems
are usually the ones who notice improvement. I wish
I had the chance to compare these discs on such
equipment, and look forward to hearing remarks from
those individuals.
The DTS audio would be the only substantial reason
to upgrade to the Superbits version. I found
it to be cleaner with more distinctive channel
placement.
Finally, the menu system is actually IMPROVED
in the Superbits version, as the standard
release was one of Columbia's earliest DVD titles
and suffers from a lackluster chapter selection.
The Superbits contains pictures from each
scene to get you where you want to go, compared to
plain text on the standard edition.
All in all, I think the DVD world could clearly
survive without Superbits. I have seen too
many recent releases from all the studios that use
up more bandwidth with extras and still boast a
picture quality that rivals anything put out on
the Superbits label.
Release Date: December 11th
 

Steve_Ch

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 14, 2001
Messages
978
Ron,

Are there any differences in content?? I am referring to things such as extras (I do not have the current DVD). It sounds like the conclusion is similar to other superbits titles: if you don't have it, it's probably worth to get the Superbit version, but if you already have it, probably not worthwhile to buy another copy.
 

JeremySt

Screenwriter
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
1,771
Real Name
Jeremy
Thanks for the review, and job well done. I am most certainly going to purchase this new edition of DRACLUA. I do have the old version, but the fact that it contains DTS is enough to make me justify buy a new one. I, for one, think that the video quality on SUBERBIT titles is dramatically improved. I am very surprised that Columbia decided to release SUPERBIT titles, especially ones with no fatures. I would understand it alot more if the SUPERBITS were released as special editions with extra features contained on a second disc. My basic conclusion on superbit is that those with mediocre displays( $1000 and less) and mediocre DVD players ( $1000 and less) shouldn't bother. These titles are meant for big buck sytems, with displays that show DVD's in their pure raw form, warts and all. On the other hand, if you have never owned the previous edition of Dracula, then youwould certainly buy this one. Just my 2 cents worth.
 

HankM

Second Unit
Joined
May 15, 1999
Messages
332
I can't wait to add this one to my collection, my original version was traded in when I heard it would be a Superbit title. I too see improvements with these Superbit titles with my Panny RP-91 & Mits 46805 which is ISF calibrated..
 

Brad_W

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 18, 2001
Messages
1,358
I am referring to things such as extras (I do not have the current DVD).
There are no extras on the original DVD. Plus, the Superbit DVDs don't have extras to make room for the higher bitrate in picture quality and sound. Therefore, no extras on either disc. If I were you (not owning either of the discs) I would at least pick up the Superbit disc due to DTS. The 1997 disc only has dd 5.1
 

Dave H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2000
Messages
6,167
I don't own either version of Dracula so I will buy the Superbits' version. I believe, having a 61" TV, that some minor improvement would be visible. To me, even a small improvement in quality is worth the extra $5.00 increase for the Superbit version.
 

Steve Christou

Long Member
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2000
Messages
16,333
Location
Manchester, England
Real Name
Steve Christou
My R2 DVD of 'Bram Stoker's Dracula' did have some extras, a 29min documentary called 'Dracula, The Myth, The Legend', plus a costume design gallery and trailers, I'm very happy with my DVD and I would only buy it again if a special edition is released with a Francis Coppola commentary.
 

Jim Reynolds

Agent
Joined
Jun 16, 1999
Messages
30
Dave H,Last night I stopped at our local Walmart and found CTHD,AF1,and 5th Element,all Superbit to my suprise,for less than $20.If I hadn't bought these I would have picked them up:frowning: .Jim
 

Dave H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2000
Messages
6,167
Does anyone have any information as to how well the Superbits have been selling?
 

Michael St. Clair

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 3, 1999
Messages
6,001
The original 'Dracula' DVD had noticeable compression artifacts in dark scenes. They squeezed too much on a single-layered disc. I no longer have the movie, and will likely buy the new one.
Even if it's the same telecine transfer, the new disc should have a LOT fewer artifacts. Ron, maybe your contrast and brightness are too low to see the bad artifacts on the original disc?
 

Carlo_M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 31, 1997
Messages
13,392
First of all, it is apparent that the Superbit

release comes from the same master as the 1997

release. You can clearly see the same black splotches

across the Columbia Pictures logo on both transfers
Argh, here is where the SuperBits effort begins to go sour. I had hoped that along with the gimmick of putting "all available bits" to picture and quality (and that can be debated on end)--that the natural progression of SuperBit technology would include a new, clean, high quality, high def transfer from a very good print.

Granted the original Dracula was a great disc in its day, and still looks good today, I believe that CTHV missed a real opportunity here to make this movie shine on DVD.

Ah well, I can't wait for Bjoern's review. Between his and Ron, I will be able to make up my mind on whether I will repurchase this title...
 

Ronald Epstein

Founder
Owner
Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 1997
Messages
66,794
Real Name
Ronald Epstein
I should always list the equipment I base my

reviews upon....

Toshiba 57HX81 RVP television

Panasonic RP91 progressive scan DVD
 

Dwayne

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 22, 2000
Messages
770
Isn't Coppola working on a SE????

If so, I'll wait 'till then before deciding on upgrading from the first disc.
 

Seth Paxton

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 5, 1998
Messages
7,585
I skipped the average DVD release before due to owning the Criterion LD. So I don't need content. Therefore I will be picking up this release as a no-brainer.

Ron, while I can understand the "the world wouldn't miss Superbits", I do think that CTHV is on the right track in one manner. I think to be consistent with what LD was trying to do, the DVD world should be ALL Superbits accompanied by SEs for films. As DVD becomes huge I certainly think there is room to release to different markets. Heck, LDs came in CAV and CLV formats even from Criterion, let alone normal vs box sets.

The only studio reason I could see is that they figure more money can be made by just producing 1 version and selling to all. However, a studio with their audience in mind would consider selling different product to different types of consumers. There are plenty of people who only want the film and don't care about extras, just as there are those who want tons of extras.

For me it depends on the film, but I would like to have the choice on some films. 5th Element was perfect for me as I wasn't very interested in extras for that anyway, so if I was going to own it then the Superbit philosophy was just what I was looking for.
 

Carlo_M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 31, 1997
Messages
13,392
I just wanted to make sure one point wasn't lost in my garbled post.

A brand new (or at least great-looking if they already have one), pristine HD transfer should be used for each "SuperBits" title. It's a "Garbage In, Garbage Out" reality with MPEG encoding. You can throw all the bits you want at a mediocre transfer, it will still look like a mediocre transfer. Kind of like trying to add a lot of wax to an old flaky paint job...
 

RobertR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 19, 1998
Messages
10,675
Bjoern Roy does an excellent job of analyzing what makes a good DVD transfer. He points out that increased bit rate is NOT a cure-all for mitigating transfer problems (EE, lack of shadow detail, muted colors, etc.). He points out that increased bit rate is of greatest benefit when the transfer has minimum filtering, thereby increasing detail. The greater bit rate is then needed to avoid MPEG artifacts.
 

Youssef

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
May 30, 2000
Messages
92
i am eagerly awaiting this title myself since the first ones video transfer is really soft looking and washed out on my widescreen tv. I do have to disagree with the review though since Ron's review of the picture quality on the SB of 5th element said the improvement was not noticeable to him while i thought the improvement was so drastic that i would go so for as to say it was like night and day for me. so i guess i'll have to judge for myself on this one.
 

ErichH

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 1, 2001
Messages
1,163
I second the opinion of TheFifthElement SB as a BIG improvement .

Some of the close ups are almost 3D and there's much more background

sharpness on my set . RP91 with a non - progressive TV SonyKP43 .

Can't wait to see it on my new Pioneer(coming soon) . The audio is

great as well - being one of the most fun to hear discs in my collection .

To Each His Own (or his own equipment & room)

Eric
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,070
Messages
5,130,058
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top