Ted Ross
Second Unit
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2001
- Messages
- 394
Oops, I should have said I can get the rsw-15 for $800 not the KSW-15. I edited my above post. That puts it in the vtf-3 range.
Also Edward in the test you put the link up to, the reason the rsw15 did not test as well as the current test by Tom N is I believe that Brian has the sub either set up wrong or he had a weak, or defective unit, read the test by tom n that rsw15 is an animal if set up corectlyMark:
Do you have a hotlink to that review? I have not read it, and I would very much like to.
No one is doubting the SPL capabilities of the RSW-15, nor the sound quality. Considering the fact that the sample model Brian tested pounded out 110 dB at 32 Hz 12 feet from the mic in a 3,600 ft3 (!!) room is evidence plenty of its "animal" nature, and I highly doubt it was weak or defective.
Also, he moved the sub several times to get the best results before finally taking his measurements. Give the guy some credit - I'm sure he knows how to set-up a sub and he writes for a pretty prestigious HT/HF journal.
Until I see instrumented testing (SPL vs. FR) demonstrating otherwise, I'm still of the opinion that the RSW-15 is not a bottom feeder. It was 15 dB down at 20 Hz, as compared to the 32 Hz level. That doesn't mean its a bad sub - Weatherhead loved it and so does just about everyone else that hears it. It seems to have few peers above 30 Hz in both sound quality and output.
Regards,
Ed