It was you!I wish you luck. The binders have worked well for me. View attachment 183119
I had something very similar which I used for CDs but after a time I reverted to putting them back on shelves because I missed seeing the complete package, front and rear, easily. My new plan is one in; one out. Although that doesn’t always work either
I saw this a few months ago and thought it is brilliant. I'm probably going to do the same with mine, minus the clear bag containers. Comic boxes work great. Categorize them for easy access.
I have a little different approach to storing my discs. I keep my DVDs in a climate controlled storage building in my back yard...
View attachment 183122
... after I've put them onto my Plex server.
View attachment 183123
This has been working pretty well for me.
---------------
Yes I am getting short on shelf space. There used to be a product by Atlantic- a very tall, multi shelf piece of furniture that holds several hundred units- will have to see if I can still find that (Best Buy used to stock these, but stopped doing so a while ago).
This is why I've been ripping BD/4K discs in my collection that just aren't going to get a lot of repeat viewings to my Plex server and then storing the discs out of sight. I get the physical discs out of my rack, I get bit-perfect playback (video and audio) of my ripped copies, and I still have the physical copy as a backup. Retaining the physical copies can be problematic for someone like you, Robert, who has such a huge number of discs. However, if you're a smaller collector and have the expertise to build a server system (plain old Windows 10/11 will do in this case) with plenty of storage, it really does solve a lot of problems. Sure, it costs money, but what doesn't?
This is why I've been ripping BD/4K discs in my collection that just aren't going to get a lot of repeat viewings to my Plex server and then storing the discs out of sight. I get the physical discs out of my rack, I get bit-perfect playback (video and audio) of my ripped copies, and I still have the physical copy as a backup.
I have had my DVD, and BD in storage containers for the most part since I moved into my home a few years ago. They are literally out of sight out of mind, which has me rethinking my collection. Seriously thinking about selling all by a couple hundred of them as most I will never rewatch in my lifetime again. It would also give me peace of mind that if something ever happened to me I wouldn't burden relatives with an absurd amount of films on disc to figure out what to do with.
I don’t have the expertise to build such a system. Hell, I was stressed out last year knowing I had to upgrade my computer in order to use Windows 11.This is why I've been ripping BD/4K discs in my collection that just aren't going to get a lot of repeat viewings to my Plex server and then storing the discs out of sight. I get the physical discs out of my rack, I get bit-perfect playback (video and audio) of my ripped copies, and I still have the physical copy as a backup. Retaining the physical copies can be problematic for someone like you, Robert, who has such a huge number of discs. However, if you're a smaller collector and have the expertise to build a server system (plain old Windows 10/11 will do in this case) with plenty of storage, it really does solve a lot of problems. Sure, it costs money, but what doesn't?
This thread wasn’t meant to talk about methods to digitize your movie collection.Was planning on starting a new thread but think this one might apply.
What is the general consensus on the best option for digitizing discs?
From what I can tell (although have not yet looked into it in any detail as it is not a urgent requirement) it seems there are quite a few options available.
Stumbled upon some kind of device a year or so ago and thought their website was bookmarked but seems as though that did not happen.
Was some type of digital hard-drive that stores discs with minimal quality loss and the graphical interface software looked very practical and user friendly. Completely forgot the make and model, however.