Tommy_N
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2002
- Messages
- 131
Hello everyone,
First let me just say I stumbled across this board a couple of weeks ago. Wow, I'm very immpressed. There are a lot of knowledgeable people out there, with some great advice.
I'm in the market for a new reciever. I'm planning on spending between 1,000 to 1,500. However, I want something that I'll own for a while. Minimum 10 years hopefully closer to 15.
I'm debating about getting seperate pre/processor and amp. I know I would need to spend at least an extra $2,000, which would delay the purchase a couple months.
Most of my listening is casual and low volume so I don't know if it is really worth it for me. Even with my current set-up I know I could get better sound just by moving the speakers around. However, due to room layout, furniture layout, girlfriend etc that is not possible.
So I think the pre/pro amp would be a waste.
I think the money would be better spent on speakers. Or would there be a major difference? What do you all think?
Thanks
Tom
First let me just say I stumbled across this board a couple of weeks ago. Wow, I'm very immpressed. There are a lot of knowledgeable people out there, with some great advice.
I'm in the market for a new reciever. I'm planning on spending between 1,000 to 1,500. However, I want something that I'll own for a while. Minimum 10 years hopefully closer to 15.
I'm debating about getting seperate pre/processor and amp. I know I would need to spend at least an extra $2,000, which would delay the purchase a couple months.
Most of my listening is casual and low volume so I don't know if it is really worth it for me. Even with my current set-up I know I could get better sound just by moving the speakers around. However, due to room layout, furniture layout, girlfriend etc that is not possible.
So I think the pre/pro amp would be a waste.
I think the money would be better spent on speakers. Or would there be a major difference? What do you all think?
Thanks
Tom