Yikes:
Box Office Bust: ‘Black Adam’ Faces Theatrical Losses
"Black Adam" is poised to lose millions in its theatrical run.
variety.com
When a movie makes $387 million and it loses $100 million, that's the dumbass fault of the studio for the simplistic thinking of "comic book + The Rock = $1,000,000,000,000,000,000" and writing a blank check instead of realizing that no one outside of a comic book store knows who Black Adam is & that the DC movies aren't as popular as the Marvel movies and not adjusting the budget for those facts.Yikes:
Box Office Bust: ‘Black Adam’ Faces Theatrical Losses
"Black Adam" is poised to lose millions in its theatrical run.variety.com
I don't think so as it was only a cameo by Cavill. They could easily have Johnson come back as Black Adam in future movie.That statement reads to me like a nice way to avoid saying they're done with Black Adam.
We know that Johnson pushed for Henry Cavill to be included in Black Adam because he himself said so. We also know that Henry Cavill is no longer playing Superman because they are rebooting that character with a younger actor.
Keeping Johnson as Black Adam opposite another Superman doesn't add up. Yes, they can do it with the multiverse concept. But it seems like the whole reason to reboot again would be to ditch all the baggage that comes with the previous universe. Keeping Black Adam would be counterintuitive to that goal.
It seems like ditching Dwayne Johnson and Henry Cavill is a cost-cutting move. DC is retrenching, and so will no longer be paying big stars c. $30 million or so per movie. Whether DC can make successful movies with lesser-known actors who make a fraction of that remains to be seen.
Inside Movie Stars’ Salaries: Joaquin Phoenix Nabs $20M for ‘Joker 2,’ Tom Cruise Heads to Over $100M and More
From Tom Cruise to Leonardo DiCaprio with a stop at Margot Robbie and Dwayne Johnson, here's what the biggest movie stars are earning.variety.com
"Johnson, for instance, asked for and received $22.5 million to play the lead in “Black Adam,” a DC superhero movie. In addition, he will receive millions more for producing the film, and earns a fee on top of that to promote the movie on his social media channels."
It is worth noting that Henry Cavill was a lesser-known actor when he began his run as Superman.Whether DC can make successful movies with lesser-known actors who make a fraction of that remains to be seen.
I think this depends on what the overarching plan is. If the entire DCEU that began with Man of Steel is being completely rebooted, then I think that has to include Gunn's previous projects. He obviously cares about those, and this is why I don't think he would take such a decision lightly. Peter Safran is also a producer on Shazam and Aquaman, so he has an investment in the current films as well. If they do decide to reboot the whole thing, their willingness to move on from their own work would demonstrate to me the seriousness with which they believe rebooting is the right thing to do.I wonder if Gunn’s DCEU works (The Suicide Squad, Peacemaker) will be rebooted or allowed to continue?