MikeEn
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2000
- Messages
- 126
No, but she's really pissed.
1) Why on earth would the CIA need approval from the Department of Justice to carry out a mission in France?Huh? This is what I mean... who rightly CARES if the CIA needs, or doesn't need, the approval from the DOJ or the FBI or Grampa Simpson, they key is the MISSION. Stop overthinking it. Ooo... they didn't have a Senate Oversight Committee meeting before they did went on the mission and it clearly says in the CIA Rulebook section B) subsection i) that "no secret CIA missions to France, or any of its properties, may be undertaken without the express permission of the Senator in charge of said agency and forthwith and notwithstanding the Director of such department shall be reprimanded by... blah blah blah" (except that there is obviously some who care or the questions would not be asked... I suggest that group watch 'The Agency')
Well anyways...
Huh? This is what I mean... who rightly CARES if the CIA needs, or doesn't need, the approval from the DOJ or the FBI or Grampa Simpson, they key is the MISSION.I care because it's sloppy writing that serves no purpose. The writers could have come up with a better excuse for de-moting him.
Oh, 2 other "WTF?" moments during the show that I forgot to mention:
1) With her track record, the CIA is just going to blindly believe that the DNA information from Irina is valid, and not only set Will loose but let him get back on the case?
2) Sydney also mentioned about him not having that drug in his blood as corroborating evidence. But couldn't they have tested for that earlier and saved themselves a whole lot of trouble?
1) With her track record, the CIA is just going to blindly believe that the DNA information from Irina is valid, and not only set Will loose but let him get back on the case?
2) Sydney also mentioned about him not having that drug in his blood as corroborating evidence. But couldn't they have tested for that earlier and saved themselves a whole lot of trouble?Those really bothered me as well, and I can usually suspend my disbelief further than most people.
Also, fair is fair - you guys get Jennifer Garner in lingerie/bikinis pretty much at least once a week - why couldn't we have had Vaughn instead of Syd in the leather?! Just this once? COME ON!!
Also, fair is fair - you guys get Jennifer Garner in lingerie/bikinis pretty much at least once a week - why couldn't we have had Vaughn instead of Syd in the leather?! Just this once? COME ON!!It is funny how Syd has to disguise herself to retrieve Sark, while Vaughn (who Sark would also recognize) sits right next to her in his normal clothes.
It is funny how Syd has to disguise herself to retrieve Sark, while Vaughn (who Sark would also recognize) sits right next to her in his normal clothes.Plus Sark would have recognized her anyway, the "disguise" was purely gratuitous. (Which is fine, I understand that's what the show's all about, I'm just asking for a little reciprocity!)
John, maybe I'm confused, but I think they knew all along that the gene therapy patients took the drug, so they should have tested him right away.
Plus Sark would have recognized her anyway, the "disguise" was purely gratuitous. (Which is fine, I understand that's what the show's all about, I'm just asking for a little reciprocity!)I was half expecting some sort of comment from Syd or Vaughn when the source mentioned that Sark was meeting this guy "in a nearby sex club."
::sigh:: "Of course he is."
For all of you who can't suspend disbelief and are not pleased there's always a ton of mindless Reality shows out there you can watch.I think even Alias is more realistic than the shows to which you refer.
For all of you who cant suspend disbelife and are not pleased theres always a ton of mindless Reality shows out there you can watch.That sounded like a shot with the jugular in mind.
I have no problems suspending belief. I watch Buffy to this day, and when I was a kid I read X-Men and Spider-Man. Thats not the issue.
The issue is rules - grounding. Alias won't establish any rules, just so it can jump all over the place as it wants. If they want Vaughn to get pregnant, they'll do it, just 'because'. Doesn't seem like a real big problem, does it?
The problem comes into play when the show tries to be so serious. Like I said earlier, if this was the Marshal show - all goofy and funny - there wouldn't be a problem. Its meant to be funny and not really reflect real life.
But Alias is pretty heavy on the drama - we're supposed to be concerned for the characters, among other things. But without grounding the show can't possibly be taken serious. Is anyone actually concerned for the characters, at all? I'm not. Because I know they'll just come up with some bullshit to explain it. It'll make sense on the surface, but the moment you examine it - at all - it'll begin to fall apart.
The show is written completely out of convenience. Abrams wants a big ending? Well, he can do whatever he wants because his show has no rules or grounding. Not exactly "good" writing in my book. The end product is...stupid. Time traveling 2 years as a last ditch cliffhanger is pretty stupid in my book. Not to mention a pretty cheap, lame ending.
Alias is trying to be the James Bond of TV. Thats fine. Trouble is, without any rules, it comes off more like Austin Powers - except Austin Powers is trying to be stupid - Alias isn't. It just does what it wants, when it wants with NO attempt to write in any kind of boundary and it comes off pretty silly.
I'm all for entertainment. Would I like to watch something with some depth over something superficial? Absolutely. But I'm all for a little mindless action now and then - Alias just needs to stop trying to be serious. If it wants to be serious, establish some rules to ground the characters, if it doesn't then quit trying to be so dramatic. Shows CAN have their cake and eat it too, but Alias hasn't figured out how...yet.
JQ