RobertSiegel
Reviewer
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
- Messages
- 1,290
One could argue that most of the shots above the caption were taken on location daytime in Austria whilst the lower image is in Hollywood shot inside in a scene that is supposed to be night interior ... or she is singing about raindrops on roses with appropriate hair to match ! Only her hairdresser knows for sure !
Her hair (and Nicholas Hammond's for that matter) has always been darker in MY FAVORITE THINGS because it was the first scene shot and the bleaches used to lighten the hair hadn't completely done the job. Her hair got lighter throughout the location shoot and was at its lightest in the opening scene, shot last in Austria before returning to Hollywood.
Is the Salzburg, Austria title shot supposed to remain golden for its duration, or is it supposed to have the colors drained down? Seems as if I read someone who worked on a remaster with Mr. Wise, and he told the to keep the color drained and tonot touch that knob!
Good to see you around here again, Joe. IIRC [emphasis on "recall correctly'], the only way to come close to matching the AR would be to strip the mag track from the 70mm print which (1) is heresy; and (2) would likely damage the emulsion underneath, rendering the exercise pointless.Fox can not restore the sand pebbles 17 minutes and edit it into the good looking short master
1. The film was shot in 35mm and fox restored the 35mm negative. the extra footage was found n a blow up 70mm release print.
Insert the extra footage in the short master and the aspect ratios will not match.
Disney needs to just sell off these films if they have no interest - they even havent done Poppins in 4K Disney loves streamiong just do a deal with KINO to release blu raysI wonder what the progress is on the 4k version. Does anyone know?
I saw Sound of music over 130 times in the theaters on a big screen over the years.
This aint it. Shadow detail does NOT look good to me, The colors are way off what they were in the theater.
The picture starts way too blue, then often goes too red on thei ndoor scenes.
In the opening number, on thel ast dvd, the sound of Julie slapping her apron was missing. incredibly,it is still gone on the english tracks but is on all of the foregn tracks and themusic and effects track has it too.
The foreign tracks have a nice high end, completely missing from both of the english tracks. Not good. I was less than impressed with this new transfer. Think I'll stick with the fortieth anniversary edition.
The new extras are not a new doc, but a hunt and peck thinkg that quickly grows tiresome.
save your money for the 50th anniversay edition, which I am sure that, even now, they are planning.
I had always missed this thread for some reason, and Robert Harris, if you are still subscribed, I would like to ask you a question about this. Many people who have projected this movie in theaters have complained on threads here at HTF and other sites that the sound on the film is still not as good as was originally presented. Now in the short "restoring the sound" they show them at computer screen remastering this soundtrack, and one of the men shows us how they cut everything off above a certain level because it is "noise" on the high end. So we see him removing everything above a certain line. But if you look closely, there are signals there as well (above the lines). I submit to you that this was where the original tape hiss was (because there was no Dolby noise reduction in those days).
Now I have not heard of any modern day magic that can remove tape hiss without removing everything else in that area of the signal. Many complaints that the high end is missing here, and it is. Listen to the gold laserdisc CD and even the soundtracks on all versions up to the blu-ray restoration and the upper end is there. I do not hear, nor do many other SOM fans the extreme upper end which would include mainly instruments like horns on the blu-ray soundtrack. Have they cut out the very high end by taking the tape hiss and removing it? I think Fox wanted a "hiss free" soundtrack which this should not be.
Personally, I would much rather have the tape hiss still there and retain the very high end. I think so much was hurt by doing this. The chorus at the end singing "Climb Every Mountain," and so much of the orchestra recording. Listen to the 40th anniversary edition or the laserdiscs. That high end is fantastic. The richness of the recording is better now, but I will always feel that we have lost the very high end of the recording of this soundtrack and I really feel Fox should correct this and remove the filters that were used on the high end to cut it off at a certain point to eliminate the original tape hiss. Joe Caps certainly agrees and he has worked in remastering and knows his business. He hates the new soundtrack for its loss of high end.
Does anyone else agree? Mr. Harris, any input? I Mean your My Fair Lady has a much better high end as does Oklahoma, recorded 10 years earlier. I really want Fox to correct this and don't know how to get this heard.
...or how teal it is ?But can you hear the apron snap?
Made me wonder if they didn't actually redo the soundtrack (again) w/out (or w/ much less) high freq cutoff, but I found no indication of that actually done for the BD itself w/ my cursory searching so far. Anyone else here actually compared the 50th anniv BD to be sure? And the 50th anniv soundtrack album, which you can check out on Apple Music?