And I'm really stuck on two exchanges that were shared in this thread, one between Arrow and the customer, the other from Bullmoose and the customer. Bullmoose is a small New England retailer with a reputation for providing excellent customer service and really caring about their products and customers. Bullmoose told their customers that they had originally ordered X number of copies, but that at the last minute, Arrow drastically cut their allotment and only shipped out a small percentage of what they had ordered. Arrow told the customer that they didn't cut anyone's allotment, that every retailer got the exact number of copies they had been promised, and it was the retailer's fault for selling copies that they knew in advance they weren't going to get. Which one of those responses seems more believable? That a retailer got caught by surprise when the label cut the number of copies they were receiving at the last moment? Or that the label sent out everything out as promised, and that the problem is that the retailers are lying and took orders they knew they could never fill? Both of those things can't be true at the same time. I don't think Bullmoose is lying.
Consider the possibility that when Bullmoose says "Arrow drastically cut the allotment," what they really mean is that Arrow's distributor cut the allotment, not necessarily Arrow themselves. The Arrow spokesman may not have been in the loop with what problems their distributor was having. From Arrow's perspective, they sent out all the discs they were supposed to and didn't cut anyone's allotment. The problems happened somewhere in the distribution chain between Arrow and the retailers, with neither end getting the full story.
As I mentioned earlier in this thread, I have watched Arrow releases for a long time, and their U.S. release dates routinely get pushed back at the last minute. I believe they've had recurring problems with their North American distributor. This disc probably should have been rescheduled for January, but the label may have tried to hold firm to a late December release in order to keep it on the books for 2017. Ultimately, the distributor couldn't follow through with that.
Nobody at Arrow could have possibly expected this disc to be an immediate hot seller (which, again, it actually wasn't). If they had believed it to potentially be a major revenue generator, they never would have scheduled it for the day after Christmas, which is traditionally one of the slowest days for retail the whole year. That date is a last-minute dropping ground for product that needs to be on the books for the calendar year.
[Edit: I was writing this at the same time as the response that got posted immediately before it.]
Last edited: