JoshJAN
Auditioning
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2004
- Messages
- 12
Hi guys! I am new to the forums and fairly new to home theatre as well. I am in the process of setting up an inexpensive home theatre. I am having some problems with my dvd player's picture quality though. I thought that maybe someone could help me out with some information.
I have a Panasonic 47" widescreen HDTV monitor(model PT-47WX53). I was using an old RCA dvd player that was not progressive scan. I had the player hooked up to the tv via Monster component video cables. I decided to upgrade to a progressive scan player, so I bought a Harman Kardon DVD22.
The problem I am experiencing is that when I hooked the player up to my tv using the component cable, my movies looked a lot fuzzier and washed out compared to when I was using my old RCA player. I decided to try a different player so I hooked up a Pioneer DV-563A and saw a slight improvement, but the progressive picture still wasnt as sharp or clear as the interlaced picture.
What I am wondering is if something could be wrong with my equipment (tv needs adjustment, faulty cables, etc...), or if I am just not understanding the whole point of progressive scan. I thought that it enabled me to receive a much sharper and clearer picture. I appreciate any comments or suggestions regarding this subject. I just want to know if the progressive scan player is worth it, or if I should just stick to my old RCA player. Thank you all for your help!!!!
Joshua Janoski
I have a Panasonic 47" widescreen HDTV monitor(model PT-47WX53). I was using an old RCA dvd player that was not progressive scan. I had the player hooked up to the tv via Monster component video cables. I decided to upgrade to a progressive scan player, so I bought a Harman Kardon DVD22.
The problem I am experiencing is that when I hooked the player up to my tv using the component cable, my movies looked a lot fuzzier and washed out compared to when I was using my old RCA player. I decided to try a different player so I hooked up a Pioneer DV-563A and saw a slight improvement, but the progressive picture still wasnt as sharp or clear as the interlaced picture.
What I am wondering is if something could be wrong with my equipment (tv needs adjustment, faulty cables, etc...), or if I am just not understanding the whole point of progressive scan. I thought that it enabled me to receive a much sharper and clearer picture. I appreciate any comments or suggestions regarding this subject. I just want to know if the progressive scan player is worth it, or if I should just stick to my old RCA player. Thank you all for your help!!!!
Joshua Janoski