Jon Mercer
Second Unit
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2001
- Messages
- 268
Has anyone stopped watching Indiana Jones long enough to watch this and is it any good?
I must be living under a rock...when did this come out?Yesterday.
It was kind of easy to miss with all the big releases out yesterday as well, though.
The last I heard (possibly from a post by David Lambert? I'm not sure now), WB had confirmed that they were planning season sets for Batman: The Animated Series (after long rejecting the idea), presumably for 2004Not from me.
Although I can confirm that Superman: Last Son of Krypton is on the way.
(Batman: Mystery of the Batwoman has apparently been cropped to 1.33:1; yes, it's a direct-to-video title, but it seems it was animated for the HD/widescreen television spec, 1.78:1)After watching the special features (which showed the scenes being drawn), I figured that is what happened.
It's too bad that they don't realize that the kids don't mind widescreen. :frowning:
Not from me.Ah, my mistake, Dave -- sorry about that. I read word of it somewhere, but can't recall now just where (it might have even been a studio comment; I just don't recall). It sounded on the up and up (more than a rumor), but only WB can say with certainty. I hope the sets come to pass.
yes, it's a direct-to-video title, but it seems it was animated for the HD/widescreen television spec, 1.78:1I noted that in the review I linked to a week ago as well. Though it was animated at 16x9, the storyboards shown in the supplements look a lot like the monitors I've seen on supplements of live-action movies.
Those monitors are typically 4x3 and generally show a similarly 4x3 image, but the intended widescreen area (1.85:1 or what have you) is clearly marked. The storyboards for ...Batwoman are similarly designed, only in reverse. The storyboards are 1.78:1, but a 1.33:1 area in the center is clearly marked. I'm not suggesting that 1.33:1 is necessarily the intended aspect ratio, but it appears to have been designed to accomodate cropping, at least, and I didn't notice any composition issues in my two viewings of the movie. Actually, if not for the widescreen material in the supplements, I wouldn't have thought twice about its aspect ratio.
They crop Return of the Joker from the 4x3 animated ratio to 16x9 for the unedited version.Look at the extras. The movie was storyboarded for 16x9, and the letterboxed version is reportedly preferred by the creators. (I don't remember if that's in the commentary, but I remember hearing or reading a direct quote about that somewhere. I can dig it up, if necessary.)
It's premature at this point, I would say, to assume that the OAR is 1.78:1 just because it was animated that way..."more" doesn't mean "right", especially considering that the full-frame version of ROTJ has more animation and is reportedly not the preferred version.
This was created for 16x9, but is being shown full screen...does this mean it is open matte, or is it actually pan & scam?