- Joined
- Dec 10, 2001
- Messages
- 6,724
- Real Name
- Bob
Yes, I believe 1.85 is correct.
Just to add to this, his preceding film Little Malcolm I've just remembered is presented 1.85:1 on Blu-ray by the BFI also. Why go from 1.85:1 to 1.66:1 back to 1.85:1? I'm fairly sure these things were standardised by the mid-70s!EddieLarkin said:On a related note, Criterion are presenting Stuart Cooper's Overlord (1975) at 1.66:1. Twilight Time presented his follow up, The Disappearance (1977) at 1.85:1 (which of course, it looked fine at). Both were British productions. Interestingly though, he supervised the former transfer but not the latter.
It would be interesting to know if the commentary, regarding "the production history" and "visual style of the film", even mentions that it was the very first of Walter Wanger's productions to be in widescreen, and that the disc itself doesn't offer this version at all.[*]Commentary - film scholar Matthew H. Bernstein discusses the production history of Riot in Cell Block 11, the visual style of the film and the narrative's unique qualities that separated it from other similarly themed films produced before 1954, the initial reviews for the film, etc. Indeed, this is a wonderful commentary with plenty of excellent information that makes it extremely easy to appreciate Don Siegel and writer Richard Collins' vision. It was recorded exclusively for Criterion in 2014.
[/list]
Mark-P said:The Big Country was shot in Technirama (35mm Horizontal) with a native aspect ratio of 2.25:1 and would have been presented theatrically in 70mm at 2.21:1 and in 35mm at 2.35:1. (See specs here)
The distortion comes from taking the negative ratio of 2.25:1 and stretching it to 2.35:1
Here is how it appears on the Blu-ray at 2.35:1:
4383_1_1080p.jpg
And here is how it looks adjusted back to 2.25:1:
4383_1_1080p2.jpg
To me that person just confirms they don't know and it looks right to them, i am highly doubtful.EddieLarkin said:These comments suggest it might be:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R1WDGUS9N0GVEO/ref=cm_cr_pr_cmt?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00FYPICTM#wasThisHelpful
Going by those dates, the other two titles that Studio Canal are releasing on Blu-ray, An Inspector Calls and Hobson's Choice, were shot before 17th December 2013 as they were classified by the BBFC by 27th November 1953 and 5th January 1954 respectively.Bob Furmanek said:BELLES was reviewed by Variety on October 13, 1954.
I don't know when it was filmed but on 12/17/53, British-Lion was filming for 1:8. By 3/16/54, they were 1.65:1.
Optically converting TLA to CS uses a standard 50% de-anamorphosis, yielding 35mm elements that would be correct. All that was necessary to create a 2.35 Blu-ray, would have been a very slight crop top and bottom.One too many digital tools being used for the US release. Have no info re foreign. To answer the query above this one in thread, MFL was affected in a similar way on its initial laser release, also not being being properly de-anamorphosized.RAHCharles Smith said:Yeah, unfortunately, many of the people posting on Amazon UK and saying the disc looks fine are not grasping what the issue is. They're declaring "it's widescreen and looks like 2.35, so the aspect ratio is correct, and what's your problem?" Someone said something to the effect that "this obviously isn't Academy stretched to widescreen, so what's the problem?"