trajan
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 1,198
- Real Name
- lar
Well, DOCTOR DOLITTLE is coming out in Germany in September. I think they may release CLEOPATRA in 2012 to compete with LAWRENCE OF ARABIA.
While I'm sure that more classic titles are in the works, I don't see any studios trying to have competing "classic" Blu-ray releases.Originally Posted by trajan
Well, DOCTOR DOLITTLE is coming out in Germany in September. I think they may release CLEOPATRA in 2012 to compete with LAWRENCE OF ARABIA.
Presumably they'd release it as a 1080i60 release.David Coleman said:As much as I hold out hope against hope, I'd love to see the Tood AO version of OKLAHOMA finally released. The question is how would they convert a 30fps release?
Even at 1080i,/60fps, I'd still grab that up!!Ethan Riley said:I suppose they'll release Cleopatra in time to tie-in with the Angelina Jolie remake--due in 2013. Meanwhile, I wish they'd do Around the World in 80 Days as a blu-ray, but that's Warners...
Originally Posted by trajan
After CLEOPATRA. I really don't know. I think we will see HELLO DOLLY before the end of 2012. Any TODD-AO release would be most welcome.
Shall we review our list of disappointments about Oklahoma! and maybe other R&H titles so they might go on record and perhaps make a difference?MattH. said:I'm crossing my fingers it's the Todd-AO Oklahoma! looking as it should look and nothing like that horror we got in the last Oklahoma! DVD set.
Totally agreed. When all it takes is a look at the film itself to figure out which is the best version, and there is more than enough historical evidence, not to mention many people they could have asked... for SOMEONE at Fox to have decided to feature the 2nd rate version and palm off the obviously superior version as a supplement, is, to say the least, troubling. It's as simple as holding out two of the same kind of cookies in front of a kid... if they seem otherwise identical, won't he reach for the bigger one? That said, and hopefully on topic, have you noticed that BluRay hasn't exactly been handled as a premium product? Especially on catalog titles, but new releases as well. Start with the packaging, to the menus that are often harder to read and navigate if they are there at all. Then we come to the sad fact that unlike with Laserdisc and many DVDs, the first release in the newer format is not always a full upgrade. Shouldn't one hope that studios will give some consideration for those of us who have made them lots of money by buying the same titles over and over again? Instead of considering our position, and realizing that good word of mouth from the fans can have a ripple affect to others, it seems they just seek to exploit us by dismissively assuming "the fans will buy it anyway" as they shamelessly double and triple dip into our wallets which they clearly take for granted. I quote that statement about the fans often because frankly, I heard it directly from the head of a major studio's homevideo department. I can name three catalog releases from Fox that were given a great treatment on DVD, nice packaging that wisely used the original key art, generous supplements, even cool paper extras like souvenir book reprints... And the one of them that has made it to Blu Ray kept most of the material on the disc, but is packaged like any other BRD and without any printed matter at all. I can also name three catalog titles Fox handled badly on DVD, with careless, inaccurate transfers, thoughtless presentation, missing material from the previous release, with cheap, tacky packaging and menus that looked like they just threw a handful of photos and some standard fonts at a high school kid and took the first thing they threw together. These three were released at a cheaper price, but I think anyone who likes these films would have been happy to pay the extra price for the kind of classy product the other three turned out to be. I tried to spark up a couple of these threads because it appeared that we might have a genuinely interested "insider" who might listen and take some of this feedback to heart, but it sadly turns out not to be the case. I googled the definition of "Public Relations" and got this: "Noun: The professional maintenance of a favorable public image by an organization or a famous person.... The state of the relationship between the public and a company or other organization or a famous person." If someone's very function is to maintain a positive communication between consumer and merchant, it seems kinda disingenuous for them to turn up their nose and bolt at a perceived slight. I would expect the professional response to be: "Can you clarify what you mean?" or "I hear you, and though i can't give a final answer, I will be happy to pass your feedback along", rather than something dismissive like "Who the heck are YOU? Whatever, buh-bye." As I've witnessed before, often ego and self-service takes a higher priority from a politicized corporate establishment than integrity. Art vs. commerce. Lose one, the other suffers, but the corporate politicos won't accurately attribute lower sales and negative reaction to anything THEY have done, they'll blame the product or the consumer, for the result of their own careless handling. Not surprised, really, disappointed nonetheless.MattH. said:I got the feeling in that last DVD release of Oklahoma! that it was Fox's desire for the Cinemascope version to be deemed the de facto standard for the movie. Its transfer if I recall was acceptably sharp with good color and acceptable sound, and it was placed first in the set with the Todd-AO version placed behind it almost as if it were a bonus feature rather than the main feature. I don't think there is much doubt that most fans of Oklahoma! prefer the Todd-AO version hands down.though naturally we'd like to have both versions in HD. I had never seen the Todd-AO version before the laserdisc was issued, and I was awestuck at the quality of the image and the splendid audio track. So I really hope the upcoming R&H box contains an Oklahoma! that its makers would be proud of.