Please release "Twilight's Last Gleaming" (Warner Bros.?)

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Ronald Epstein, Mar 30, 2004.

  1. Jeff_HR

    Jeff_HR Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    3,594
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  2. AdrianTurner

    AdrianTurner Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    67
    Post removed by owner. No reason to introduce politics in this discussion
     
  3. Jeff_HR

    Jeff_HR Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    3,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  4. AdrianTurner

    AdrianTurner Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    67
    You're joking, mate! Censorship is alive and well on the HTF. You do realise this is Twilight's Last Gleaming we are talking about - one of the most politically subversive movies ever made in Hollywood - so to censor some politically ironic comments by me seems particularly inappropriate.
     
  5. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,644
    Likes Received:
    4,490
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    Adrian,
    Allow me to introduce myself. My name is Ron Epstein and I
    am co-owner of this forum and the person solely responsible for
    what you feel is the "censorship" of your posts to this forum.
    Tell me, Adrian, when you registered here did you bother to read
    the forum rules? I would assume you did since during the registration
    process you pressed the OK button allowing you to continue and confirm
    that you did.
    So, for what reason did this thread deserve a controversial Obama comment
    that had little to do with the direction this thread was following? Surely
    you were aware that such a post is a violation of one of the strongest policies
    we have in place concerning the discussion of religion or politics. Your recent
    excuse for posting the comment was an absolute "stretch" as far as I am concerned.
    Don't you think your comment perhaps would have invited further political discussion
    from someone who might not have agreed with your statement?
    So, after being aware of our policies (since you hit OK at signup)
    you went ahead and posted a current controversial political comment
    which when removed, you then publicly accuse us of censorship. I am certain
    that since you are aware of the rules here, you knew that it might have been
    better to take this matter up with me privately, but you didn't. Now I have the
    need to make a public rebuttal which I rather would have avoided.
    I hope all of this was a misunderstanding. I welcome you here, and it
    is my hope that you will continue to be a member and respect the rules we
    have in place. If you can't, then yes, I am afraid further posts may be "censored."
    Thank You
     
  6. Michael Reuben

    Michael Reuben Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 1998
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ron Epstein just gave you a huge break, more than I would have. Make the most of it.
     
  7. Qui-Gon John

    Qui-Gon John Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2000
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey Ron, I know you said you can't tell us, but man. What is the big "secret" about the circumstances of the non-release of this title? This is more secret than the Zapruder Film and the Warren Commission Findings. [​IMG]
    Can you give hints and/or even a rough estmiate of when things might change?
     
  8. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,644
    Likes Received:
    4,490
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    I'm sorry, John, I really don't mean to create such a mystery
    about the reasons this film has not been released as of yet.
    The situation is, Warner knows how much this film means to me.
    I campaigned to get this released many years ago. When it was
    promised, and not delivered, Warner was very kind to call me and
    explain the reasons for its delay.
    I can't just come out in public and discuss those reasons -- especially
    without the consent of the studio. The reason for creating this
    "mystery" surrounding the delay was only a way of letting fans know
    that the decision to release this film is still a priority with the studio.
    When will they finally release this film? I don't know. I had thought
    it would finally be out earlier this year with the Burt Lancaster set.
    I ceased bothering the studio with questions regarding a release date
    because I know there is a specific reason for them wanting to wait.
    Believe me...I am just as frustrated over waiting so many years for
    this title to see the light of day. However, I know the studio has been
    looking at the film elements and they are very optimistic that they
    have a potentially fine release on their hands.
    I know they are reading this thread. Maybe they will allow me to
    come out with a statement on their behalf. Otherwise, The only thing
    I can recommend is to continue to post your interests in seeing this film
    released. I would also bring it up at the next WB chat that should be
    happening early next year. I think by that point they should have a better
    idea of where they are situated with this title.
     
  9. Qui-Gon John

    Qui-Gon John Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2000
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ron, that's OK, and I wasn't trying to give you a hard time about it. Just wow, very mysterious. Hope we get it soon, maybe 2009.
     
  10. AdrianTurner

    AdrianTurner Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    67
    Dear Ron and Michael - I am most desperately, heartfeltingly, grovellingly sorry and humbled, behaving as I was, like an Englishman with a sense of irony and humour and a general instinctive distrust of governments, banks and movie discussion forums. Rest assured that I will restrict any future postings to a discussion of release dates, aspect ratio, transfer quality etc.
    Which brings me to Twilight's Last Gleaming. Will it get a blue-ray release?
     
  11. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    46,644
    Likes Received:
    4,490
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein
    Adrian,
    Thank You.
    Well, we are still waiting for the announcement of a sDVD release
    which is definitely in the pipeline, but currently being delayed.
    My gut feeling (if that means anything) is that there will be
    no BD release. I say that only because this is one of those niche
    titles that I don't think the studio will feel deserves a BD release --
    especially in a time where smaller classics aren't selling well in
    the BD environment. But who knows? By the time this title finally
    surfaces BD may be in higher gear and there may be a shift in
    attitude towards films of this caliber.
    Once again, a belated Welcome Aboard!
     
  12. Jeff_HR

    Jeff_HR Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    3,594
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  13. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,449
    Likes Received:
    4,815
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    There are other good reasons beyond just waitng on a BD release. Just think about it.
    Crawdaddy
     
  14. Jeff_HR

    Jeff_HR Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    3,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you privy to the delay rationale?
     
  15. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,449
    Likes Received:
    4,815
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Yes, I'm aware of the reasoning.
     
  16. Jeff_HR

    Jeff_HR Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    3,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was just a bit curious if it was ONLY a one Man secret. [​IMG]
     
  17. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,449
    Likes Received:
    4,815
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    It's not a real secret if you think logically as to what would prevent a film's release onto DVD beyond marketing reasons.
    Crawdaddy
     
  18. ahollis

    ahollis Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    6,572
    Likes Received:
    1,547
    Location:
    New Orleans
    Real Name:
    Allen
    Not sure if this is the reason or not but here it goes.

    The film explores the how the military and politicians protect itself from the most dangerous threat of all – the truth. It also exposes one of the reasons that once we were in Vietnam, we found it so hard to get out.

    This could be too much of a conspiracy theory on my part for even I to blame, but the film was produced by Lorimar Pictures and released by Allied Artists, which Lorimar purchased in 1980. Warner owns both companies through their purchase of Lorimar in 1989. So there should not be any who owns the right’s problem, however, I am not sure why Key Video (CBS/Fox) ended up releasing the VHS, unless that was their deal at the time since in 1978 Allied Artists was basically bankrupt and did not have a video arm.

    So that leaves the only other reason, besides the conspiracy of not releasing a politically charged film during a similar conflict, that someone such as writer, author, producer, or actor has some rights to the film that cannot be cleared.
     
  19. Jeff_HR

    Jeff_HR Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    3,594
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  20. Bob Engleman

    Bob Engleman Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2000
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ron,

    Any new info on this title, you're in a position to share, would be appreciated.

    Bob Engleman
     

Share This Page