Uh oh. I wonder what other kind of trouble I can get into at amazon.co.jp???
Yes it's region AEthan Riley said:Says Region A. I guess that plays in North America?? I'm gonna get it.
Of course you could invite your Japanese friends around for a viewing or do a crash course in Japanese, otherwise you're on your own.Mike Frezon said:Thanks, Doug!
I may come back for some more help if I can't figure out the menus!
They hired the choreographer to pretty much PUT the musical on film, without widely opening it up out of its brassy stage-burlesque delivery and stagebound format--And then cutting out the show's most famous original number, "The King of Broadway", just because that would've looked even stagier. (It survives well on the deleted scenes, though.)Aaron Silverman said:To this day I'm baffled by how lame the movie of the Producers musical is compared to the stage show, which is brilliant. Dunno how they messed it up so badly.
Had they not snipped out King of Broadway, that's basically what it would have been! Whose idea was it to cut a key song that explains character motivation? That whole song is his backstory and it shouldn't have been cut.Aaron Silverman said:Frankly, I would've preferred a straight-up film of the stage production!
I could never figure out why they didn't do a movie of "Little Me," and star Sid Ceasar in it. I don't know; maybe it was too stagey and show-businessey. The novel itself could have been hilarious in a sort of mockumentary style. They could still do it and get away with it.MatthewA said:I wish they'd make more of these "old hat" movie musicals. There's plenty of stuff from the Golden Age that never got a movie version, and failing that, one could always write an original score.
Well, I love the score for Little Me, and it was certainly a tour de force for Sid Caesar on stage, but all those disguises probably wouldn't have worked on film, and since the stage show was not a box-office success (it only ran six months and didn't make back its investment; the show wasn't a hit in either of its major Broadway revivals either), no studio likely would have wanted to take a chance with it.Ethan Riley said:I could never figure out why they didn't do a movie of "Little Me," and star Sid Ceasar in it. I don't know; maybe it was too stagey and show-businessey. The novel itself could have been hilarious in a sort of mockumentary style. They could still do it and get away with it.
They could've just changed that word if they'd really wanted to.Todd J Moore said:I suspect The King of Broadway was cut just to make sure the thing didn't get an R rating. Some of the other material may have been pushing it and since that song outright drops the F bomb, well...shame, because it's a great number. But I, too, rather love the movie all the same.
Disney's reportedly jump-starting a big-budget version of the oft-shelved "Into the Woods" movie (heavily beating their Once Upon a Time comparisons into the ground), and there was talk of bringing the recent "Guys & Dolls" revival back to a (better) movie version, but that was a while ago.MatthewA said:I wish they'd make more of these "old hat" movie musicals. There's plenty of stuff from the Golden Age that never got a movie version, and failing that, one could always write an original score.
NBC hasn't announced their next live Broadway classic for next year's holiday season, but my two guesses were The King and I and Guys and Dolls. G&D may not quite be the family fare they're looking for, but I'd love to see a more complete version of the stage show on TV with a first-rate cast of singing actors.Ejanss said:Disney's reportedly jump-starting a big-budget version of the oft-shelved "Into the Woods" movie (heavily beating their Once Upon a Time comparisons into the ground), and there was talk of bringing the recent "Guys & Dolls" revival back to a (better) movie version, but that was a while ago.