Jeff Cooper
Senior HTF Member
No?You didn’t know that beforehand?
No?You didn’t know that beforehand?
I only ask because I personally check with the theater so there are no surprises. As there are very few true IMAX theaters left.
I wish! I got tickets for the "IMAX" showing and arrived to find it to be a lie-max theater. Not a true IMAX screen at all.
I arrived before the start time, because thinking this would be IMAX I expected it to be like your experience. Commercials before the feature were playing on a loop and we saw each one twice. Then once showtime passed they proceeded to play 32(!) minutes of previews and more AMC ads. After all that, and the movie finally started playing, the baby in the corner of the theater started crying. This is why I have a f'king home theater.
Is it actually the screen (or whole setup/theater) not being true (large, 1.43:1) IMAX or is it they didn't (or no longer) have 15/70mm film PJ capability, which was apparently required for Dune 2?
IIRC, someone earlier mentioned their 1.43:1 IMAX theater couldn't show it in that AR/format, but only 1.9:1, because the theater didn't have 15/70mm capability (anymore?) vs dual 4K laser.
Yeah, that probably happened for my one digital, 1.9:1 IMAX screening as well, except no crying babies... and I ran very late and got there just as the movie began, so I missed all the trailers/ads -- that was my 2nd viewing, partly to try out 1.9:1 IMAX for this, so I wasn't quite that concerned about likely missing a few minutes of the beginning, which I ended up not actually missing anyway.
I do usually aim to miss the first 10min or so knowing most screenings come w/ at least 15-20min of trailers/ads...
Anyway, as I also mentioned earlier, IMHO, this one seemed to benefit much less from the taller 1.43:1 AR than Part 1. Outside of a couple very brief, non-critical moments, it very often felt better composed for 1.9:1 than 1.43:1 IIRC. Of course, even Part 1 didn't really have quite that many nor lengthy moments that benefited greatly from 1.43:1... but I did also find the shifting AR more impactful for Part 1 since the shift was far more dramatic from 2.4:1 instead of 1.9:1 for rest of the movie...
_Man_
Commercials before the feature were playing on a loop and we saw each one twice. Then once showtime passed they proceeded to play 32(!) minutes of previews and more AMC ads. After all that, and the movie finally started playing, the baby in the corner of the theater started crying. This is why I have a f'king home theater.
Plus, people like Scorsese and Scott, screen films in their homes, in fancy theaters, maybe with actual film projectors. They ain't trudging down to the local AMC every time they want to watch a movie.This is why I roll my eyes when industry folks like Martin Scorsese or Ridley Scott go on about people needing to go to the cinema to see movies instead of watching them at home. They don't have to suffer through the shit we plebians have to.
It was the theater. It was a slightly larger screen than normal but not the giant screen. No wall of speakers behind the screen, no steep seating, just the regular sloped seats. I got rows further back because they tend to be better for the steep IMAX theater setting. However these were back far enough due to the normal slope that the screen occupied about the same field of view as my home theater projection screen does.Is it actually the screen (or whole setup/theater) not being true (large, 1.43:1) IMAX or is it they didn't (or no longer) have 15/70mm film PJ capability, which was apparently required for Dune 2?
I dunno. Those loyalty cup refill deals are a pretty big draw.Plus, people like Scorsese and Scott, screen films in their homes, in fancy theaters, maybe with actual film projectors. They ain't trudging down to the local AMC every time they want to watch a movie.
To each his own, or to each their own, I should say, but… I loved the visual decisions made on all fronts and found them to be extraordinary in detail, and the choice to use black and white was brilliant.Amazing film, but I have two minor visual gripes:
1.- The open wide scenes showing the Fremen cities looked fake, like a videogame
2.- The entire sequence of the arena fight (the black and white scene) was totally out of place and cartoonish, just an excuse to show us how "scary" and "dangerous" Elvis is.
Besides that, a really powerful film.
2.- The entire sequence of the arena fight (the black and white scene) was totally out of place and cartoonish, just an excuse to show us how "scary" and "dangerous" Elvis is.
I'm not complaining about the color, it's because the entire set looks artificial like a videogame, especially the crowd.To each his own, or to each their own, I should say, but… I loved the visual decisions made on all fronts and found them to be extraordinary in detail, and the choice to use black and white was brilliant.
But to each their own
Absolutely agree. This isn't meant to be a backhanded compliment to Butler but with Elvis, I wondered if maybe that was a case of the right actor in the right part so it worked well but to me, this performance proves that Butler is a fantastic actor. I'm sure that he will be working with big name directors in big movies for years to come.Also, I know you called him Elvis because it's Austin Butler. But if I hadn't known in advance that it was Austin Butler, I would never have guessed it was the same actor. He really transformed for both roles. His ability to play both is a testament to his work ethic and incredible range.
Yeah, gotcha I’ll have to check it again.I'm not complaining about the color, it's because the entire set looks artificial like a videogame, especially the crowd.