Joshua Clinard
Screenwriter
There are sooo many threads about the Indiana Jones DVD's that it's almost impossible to find accurate information. I would like to know a little more about any alterations being made, and the only thing that I have been able to find out for sure is that the snake's reflection in the glass is being removed. Speilberg has said that it's the only "alteration" being made. But I also seem to remember him saying earlier that quite a few effects shots were going to be fixed througout the trilogy. I was thinking that he didn't classify these fixes as "alterations", and that's why he didn't mention them. I wouldn't classify them as alteration either. They are just part of the editing process. I'm asking because I want anything that doesn't hold up visually to be fixed if possible.
I'd like to address one more thing. Many of us here talk about movies being censored by the Studios/Directors. A Director cannot censor his own film. It is also NOT censorship for Disney to release a flim with part of it edited/removed. Censorship is when the Goverment makes a law that something is prohibited from being shown. And the first amendment says "Congress shall make no law". When a studio makes a decision, that is just a private business making a business decision to sell or to not sell something that they own. I do not condone Lucas making changes to Star Wars, and then witholding the originals, as he has said he will. I really want the originals myself, and I think that it's a bad business decision to not put them out, but the fact of the matter is, they are his films. It is his right to release them as he sees fit. AND it is not censorship to cut part of it out, or add somthing to it. Let's call it what it is: A business decision. Pure and simple.
To qoute my favorite radio personality:
I'd like to address one more thing. Many of us here talk about movies being censored by the Studios/Directors. A Director cannot censor his own film. It is also NOT censorship for Disney to release a flim with part of it edited/removed. Censorship is when the Goverment makes a law that something is prohibited from being shown. And the first amendment says "Congress shall make no law". When a studio makes a decision, that is just a private business making a business decision to sell or to not sell something that they own. I do not condone Lucas making changes to Star Wars, and then witholding the originals, as he has said he will. I really want the originals myself, and I think that it's a bad business decision to not put them out, but the fact of the matter is, they are his films. It is his right to release them as he sees fit. AND it is not censorship to cut part of it out, or add somthing to it. Let's call it what it is: A business decision. Pure and simple.
To qoute my favorite radio personality:
We're losing the language. This effort to define censorship as what takes place in the free market is an effort to get people thinking that it happens in the free market and not when government does it, and that government and the likes of the great protectors like John McCain are going to go along and protect everybody from censorship when they in fact are the ones engaging in it.