What's new

why widescreen hdtv??? (1 Viewer)

Kurt Wasson

Auditioning
Joined
Nov 23, 2001
Messages
9
My wife and I have been shopping for a widescreen hdtv. In our searching, we noticed that when a dvd is played in widescreen mode, the screen still has the black bars at the top and bottom like our regular tv. Our question is, why buy a widescreen tv vs a regular tv? Another question. We were in H H Gregg and were testing out tvs trying to watch A Bug's Life. You can choose under setup to watch the movie normal screen or widescreen. Watching it widescreen, you get the black bars on the top and bottom of the widescreen tv. If we chose normal screen, the picture is formatted to fit the tv. Will we lose info on the sides as you would trying to watch it on a regular tv?
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2001
Messages
17
The only time you have bars on the top and bottom of a movie is when it is 2.35:1. On a regular (square) tv these movies have thicker bars on the top and bottom. Many movies are 16:9 which on a 16:9 widescreen tv will not have any bars on the top and bottom. So, it all depends on what movie you are watching and what format it is in. Basically, the bars mean that you are seeing the entire movie as the director intended you to see it, so it is a good thing to have bars at the top and bottom.
 

Todd_R

Grip
Joined
Jan 19, 2001
Messages
22
Just to add to what was said in the previous post, there are many movies that do fill the entire screen of a 16x9 TV. In fact it seems more & more movies are this way. Dinosaur is one movie that comes to mind that is just awesome & will fit perfectly on a widescreen TV & that is just one of many. For the movies that are 2:35:1 you will see black bars, but you are still seeing it widescreen which is great because you don't lose any of the picture. Plus when compared to watching letterbox on a 4:3 TV (which is just a rectangle put inside a square), even with the black bars, they won't bother you like they might on a 4:3 TV. On a 4:3 TV, the black bars might take up 1/2 of the screen while on a 16x9 TV they don't take up nearly that much. Widescreen TV's will have several viewing modes that will allow you to zoom the picture so that it fits your screen should you want to do so (I don't). You wouldn't want to use the DVD player setup as you mentioned to perform this formating since the TV does it with less hassle. You DO lose a very small bit on the sides when you do this as well as losing resolution since you are blowing the picture up. Don't confuse this type of formating with Pan & Scan which is quite different. This is the type of formatting when you see the phrase 'formatted to fit your TV', refering to a 4:3 TV. In basic terms, this entails taking a widescreen production & for each frame of the movie, they take a square & moving it to where the most action is, then scanning it in. So this square floats right & left depending on where it's deemed the most action is, totally cutting out the rest. With this type of processing you are losing quite a bit of the movie. With the widescreen formatting that the TV does on it's own, you are just losing a small bit on each side; far less than pan & scan where a character can actually be totaly out of the picture even though in the widescreen version they were visable. I watched The Game with Michael Douglas & it was a two sided DVD with Pan & Scan on one, widescreen (with bars) on the other. In one scene in the Pan & Scan version, he is driving his car into a driveway & all you can see is the hood of the car & a fraction of a house. In the widescreen version you could see this HUGE mansion in it's full glory. You really don't even realize how much you miss out on with Pan & Scan. It was important to see how rich he was & how big his home was, but if you didn't watch the widescreen, you missed it.
Aside from viewing HDTV which is amazing & a whole other subject, there is nothing better than watching DVD's on a widescreen TV. No comparison to watching them on 4:3. The experience of watching The Matrix, Gladiator, Crouching Tiger, Almost Famous, etc.. on a 16x9 can't be duplicated on a 4:3. I have a Mitsubishi 55" 16x9. I watch about 60% 4:3 material on it streached out which I don't mind & the rest DVD's & HDTV. I couldn't be happier with my set. Watching CSI & NYPD Blue in HD is a treat for me every week!! I haven't even mentioned how much fun XBOX & PS2 games are in 16x9 as well!!! :)
 

Richard Burzynski

Second Unit
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
466
Kurt:

Some movies are more widescreen than others. Meaning that some widescreen movies have thicker or fatter black bars (on top & bottom) than other movies. There isn't a "standard" for making movies so they come in different "sizes."

A widescreen set minimizes the size of the bars, and on certain films, will eliminate them entirely.

Basically:

Widescreen Movies on regular shaped TV = bigger bars.

Widescreen Movies on widescreen shaped TV = smaller (or no) bars.

P.S.

Get a Toshiba DVD player with 4 level zoom and you can have smaller/no bars on a regular shaped TV as well, at the expense of cutting off the right & left parts of the movie.

Rich B.
 

Ken Chan

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 11, 1999
Messages
3,302
Real Name
Ken
A Bug's Life. You can choose under setup to watch the movie normal screen or widescreen. Watching it widescreen, you get the black bars on the top and bottom of the widescreen tv. If we chose normal screen, the picture is formatted to fit the tv.
Unfortunately, it's more complicated than that :) Normal is formatted to fit 4:3, or about 1.33 times wider than tall. HDTV manufacturers know that having parts of the screen unused bothers people to varying degrees, so they have several mechanisms by which to take 4:3 material and fill the screen of wider 16:9 (about 1.78) screen. These involve stretching and/or chopping slices off the top and bottom of the picture.
(I don't mind the bars and I like my circles round....)
So choosing normal on the DVD for a widescreen TV is actually the worst of both worlds. First, they chop off a huge portion -- over 40% -- off the sides of the 2.35 picture to make it 1.33 on the DVD. (Although to be fair I believe they did some rerendering in A Bug's Life to get the characters closer together. But that is a perhaps unique exception to the simple pan&scanning that happens in general.) Then the HDTV might slice off a bit of the top and bottom so that it doesn't have to stretch the picture so much to fill the wider screen. You might even go so far as to consider that most TVs have a bit of overscan, and so you lose a few percent more on the top and bottom of the film, which you definitely would not if it is letterboxed. So worst case, you get about half of the film, slightly stretched! But the screen is filled....
As for why to get widescreen, one reason is to take advantage of the full resolution of anamorphic DVDs. Many DVDs are widescreen only, and most of those nowadays are anamorphic. When you watch such a DVD on a regular 4:3 set, the DVD player has to throw away one-fourth of the data and/or interpolate the rest. (Some high-end 4:3 sets have the so-called "squeeze" feature that lets them use that anamorphic data.)
But the real reason is that HDTV is widescreen. You really get spoiled watching shows in HD. At its best (1920x1080), it's six times the resolution of DVD (720x480). Even at lower resolutions, like ABC's 1280x720, it's 16:9. So manufacturers make HDTVs to match -- it doesn't make sense not to.
The whole "reducing the bars" reason doesn't really pan out. After all, when watching all the current 4:3 content, including TV shows on DVD, you either have to chop/stretch the picture, or you get bars on the side. (These tend to be gray, not black.) So if you don't want to chop or distort the picture, you're trading one set of bars for another.
The simple fact is, pictures come in different sizes. The funny part is that aside from the new HDTV content, nothing really is 16:9 (1.78). Regular TV and old movies are 1.33; movies nowadays are either 1.85 or 2.35. So it's kinda like the square peg round hole problem, except that the pegs and holes are just variously sized rectangles, none of which match perfectly.
In the end, you have to balance three factors:
  • Whether you can get past "the bars" bothering you. Many people have. Their presence does not dictate what you see; they're what's left over on the screen. (And be thankful they're empty -- someday, some smart-aleck is going to run ads through them or something.) You can get a large 4:3 set with large black bars and still get a bigger picture than a 16:9 set -- maybe even for less money.
  • Whether you prefer to see the whole picture, undistored
  • Whether you primarily watch 4:3 or wider content, considering that the future is 16:9
//Ken
 

Jeff Kleist

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 4, 1999
Messages
11,266
It should be noted that LARGE portions of A Bug's Life have been reanimated and framed for the 1.33:1 ratio by the original staff. Instead of compromising on a P&S, they realized that with a CG movie you have the power to please both sides. There's a whole documentary on the disc on the process.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,070
Messages
5,130,067
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top