Dave MJ
Second Unit
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2001
- Messages
- 329
A little bird told me that there might beSo let me ask. Is there a "4K77" if you will of Raiders out there?
A little bird told me that there might beSo let me ask. Is there a "4K77" if you will of Raiders out there?
There is more of a ‘grindhouse’ scan of a 35mm print.So let me ask. Is there a "4K77" if you will of Raiders out there?
Well that's what 4k77 is.There is more of a ‘grindhouse’ scan of a 35mm print.
4K 77 is a scan of a print, but it's been nicely cleaned up. The Raiders one is more like the Empire scan, with all the dust and scratches intact.Well that's what 4k77 is.
Indeed. I have seen a few caps and it probably looks closest to the 2011 Japanese HDTV version.There is more of a ‘grindhouse’ scan of a 35mm print.
The Paramount shows more grain in some sequences.
caps-a-holic.com
caps-a-holic.com
caps-a-holic.com
caps-a-holic.com
caps-a-holic.com
caps-a-holic.com
You would expect it to show grain much better and closer to the source than the HDTV version that back then would have been relatively low bitrate MPEG 2 1080i. The high variable bitrates on caps-a-holic certainly do not indicate the bitrates when it was aired.
I wouldn't doubt some filtering of sorts was applied. However, I actually watched the BD last night (JVC UHD projector at 124" upscaled with Panasonic 820 player) and didn't find DNR or filtering to be problematic in motion. The color and some of the brightness are what I questioned more.
What I noticed too last night too, the blues that are used in the movie are repurposed over and over again. In other words, one scene has a certain blue-teal hue...and that same coloring is used in multiple scenes. Same with the oranges. It's a little odd. You think there would be more variance within the coloring from scene to scene. But it's as if they kept re-using the same color say on an outside door, or something inside of a room, etc. And faces, of course, exhibit a fairly consistent orange look.
On any rate, given this is rumored for a UHD BD release next year, I am curious if they are just going to carry over what was done, or use a new color timing maybe closer to the original (which is more unlikely given these things).
Paramount's hatred of film grain is strong:
There is very little film grain throughout the whole movie in the Blu-ray version and Raiders of the Lost Ark used to be quite grainy.caps-a-holic.com
caps-a-holic.com
On a couple of occasions when the reels switched, it stop for a few minutes. Always seemed to happened around the point where Indy was showing the Government agents a picture of the ark in the book. However, that gritty, worn print look really fit the character and movie and was charming in its own way....especially now looking back.
Of course "quite grainy" can be relative, and I haven't yet watched the Blu-ray, but there are a few impressions from a preview screening in 1981 in Tulsa that I cannot forget: I was quite struck by the sharpness of the images (not so much the optical effects sequences), and the predominant golds and greens in the color palette. In response to some other posts: Teal? Not a color that I recall at all. Again, I haven't watched the Blu-ray, so I'm not sure how well it does or does not match up with my memories of the screening. (Memories are corruptible, but I can say adamantly that the orange/teal trend is a recent thing. Blue denim never used to look so unrealistic and teal on film until recently...)
Great story, I had a very similar experience back in the day, when popular movies played for many months in second run theaters. I even taped Raiders (and many others) on a portable cassette recorder hidden in my sister's purse and used to listen to it constantly (before the days of movies on VHS). I still have the tapes somewhere lol. I still remember all of the reel changes in Raiders and a few other movies.I have a little story about Raiders. I saw it about dozen times between 1981-1982. As much as I loved Star Wars and Empire, this just surpassed them and that's saying a lot as I was a huge Star Wars fan, always played with the action figures, play sets, etc. I was 9 when Raiders came out and there was a local "dollar show" that brought back seemingly the same, worn out, ultra grainy, Grindhouse-like print every few months or so. They would only show movies which were no longer playing at the big theaters (although they never got any Star Wars movies). On a couple of occasions when the reels switched, it stop for a few minutes. Always seemed to happened around the point where Indy was showing the Government agents a picture of the ark in the book. However, that gritty, worn print look really fit the character and movie and was charming in its own way....especially now looking back.
It's quite a sad situation because Spielberg declared he would no longer change his films. That's basically true for E.T. and Close Encounters. But then Raiders ended up with a revisionist color grade, remixed sound and several digitally altered shots.Quite grainy especially in the darker scenes of the movie. I remember that from seeing it in a beat up print in a cinema that certainly was well past its prime and certainly not some kind of show print. And I do not have an issue with that but I have an issue with Paramount turning it into something else.
Regarding the colors most people who went into the movies in the pre-digital era would have noticed if any movie had colors like these "reinterpretations" do today. It would have been a most unusual look and my personal opinion is that the world of movies would be better off if nobody had ever started to use it yet here we are.
Great story, I had a very similar experience back in the day, when popular movies played for many months in second run theaters. I even taped Raiders (and many others) on a portable cassette recorder hidden in my sister's purse and used to listen to it constantly (before the days of movies on VHS). I still have the tapes somewhere lol. I still remember all of the reel changes in Raiders and a few other movies.
My dad bought that same release with the Temple Of Doom plug when I was a kid.However, I ended up getting the VHS copy for Christmas in 1983 I believe. And here it is with the upcoming Temple of Doom mention:
I still have that VHS somewhere. It cost something like $40 in 1983. I would have loved to have the bootleg copy!Oh my god, I did the same thing! I made my mother sneak in my cassette recorder in her purse. lol I only got one side of a tape recorded (30 min?) before deciding not to be interrupted from watching the rest of the movie.
However, not long after that, I had perhaps the best surprise of my life: I came home from school one day and Raiders was playing on the family room TV. Someone my father knew shared a 'rough' copy (filmed with a VHS cam?). Terrible quality, but back then it didn't matter, of course. However, I ended up getting the VHS copy for Christmas in 1983 I believe. And here it is with the upcoming Temple of Doom mention: