What's new

SVS PB2-Plus Test and Review - Long (1 Viewer)

Vader

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 19, 1999
Messages
811
Real Name
Derek
Hi Ed,

As I learn more about acoustics, my complete ignorance is beginning to wane somewhat (now I understand the axiom "Ignorance is Bliss"). There are two main areas of confusion (currently), and I am really hoping that you can point out where I am all wet:

First, is the THD of my twin 20-39 PC+ cylinders. I have been unable to find THD data on the 12.3 drivers for these, so I am improvising using either the THD obtained by AVTalk for a single 20-39 PC+ using the 12.1 drivers (apples and oranges?), or the PB12 Plus/2 reviews posted by Ilkka on the shack. The AVTalk review is only of a single cylinder, so I am assuming that, since co-located duals give a 6dB headroom boost, a good approximation would be to use the curve 5dB below that of a single (i.e. the THD given by my duals at 95dB should be close to that from the single at 100dB). But, then I am still comparing the 12.1 to my 12.3, so I am probably way off here. OTOH, I am thinking that the PB12 Plus/2 is a better approx, since it is two 12.3 drivers (and the PB12 Plus is basically the box brother of one of my cylinders). That seems to match of resonably well, except below 25 Hz, where the cylinder's distortion seems to be considerably higher. To my reasoning, dual cylinders should outgun a single PB12 Plus/2 (same tune) slightly in both SPL and THD; due to increased port space and internal volume, even close to the tuning frequency (no EQ required due to greater volume?). Here's my confusion: When comparing the 12.3 to the 12.1 chart, it looks like the 12.3 actually has higher THD (most notably the 110 and 115 dB curves) than the 12.1. Everything I have read says that the 12.3 drivers are nipping at the heels of the (current) Ultra, but the tests of the Ultra cylinder at AVTalk show a significant discrepancy relative to the 12.3 drivers (from Ilkka's reviews). I thought I read somewhere that the 20-39 had < 10% THD down to the tuning frequency, but I couldn't swear to it. I am also interpreting from AVTalk that re-tuning to a lower TF (probaby 16Hz) might help. Where am I missing the boat here?

Second, the review of the single 20-39 cylinder at AVTalk shows that the FR starts a rapid drop-off at around 25Hz - about the same place where the THD shoots up (upwards of 28-30% at 100dB, if I'm reading this right...?); I would have thought it would not drop off that fast until the tuning frequency. The curves at SVSound show just this (even though they appear to be the 20-39 CS, using the 12.1 drivers). And Tom stated (I don't recall the forum or the post) that "even if you have a strong 20Hz response, if you drop off strongly a full octave above, that will seriously compromise your 20Hz capability" (I'm paraphrasing here). Yet the PB12 Plus/2 drops off at the tuning frequency of 20Hz. Is the 20-39 really closer to a 25 Hz tune than a 20Hz (native) one?

Prior to getting the SVS cylinders, I *was* blissfully ignorant about this stuff (thanks a lot, guys…..), but since I am somewhat compulsive/obsessive to begin with (so I am ), now am trying to learn all I can about it (and improve mytold… soundfield where I can). Don't get me wrong: I have absolutely no complaints about the Plus cylinders (except having to put padding under my jaw when I use them – hard floor, you know). But I don't want to turn left on the learning curve where I should have gone straight, if you get my meaning. Thanx for your expertise, and a fantastic review (one of many)!
 

Lee-c

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 2, 2000
Messages
513
There have been some odd discrepancies in Ilkka's measurements of the new 12.3 Plus woofer compared to the 12.2 version, but that may be due to the kinds of tests that Ilkka runs. If I recall correctly, Ilkka tends to use bass test signals that last quite a bit longer than the kind of bass peaks one would actually see when watching real movies on DVD at high volume. This may cause some of the 12.3 Plus woofer's distortion numbers to look worse on paper compared to the 12.2 version, but I don't think that would be the case when actually watching a movie on DVD.

SVS certainly wouldn't go to the trouble and expense to make the new 12.3 Plus woofer if it wasn't going to be better at handling the bass in movies than the 12.2 version was. :) Tom tested and measured the new 12.3 Plus woofer very intensely before approving the final design, and he has stated that the new 12.3 Plus woofer is superior in every way to the 12.2 woofer for watching movies or listening to music. So I'm sure that's the case. :)

As for your two 20-39 PC-Plus cylinders, you'd think they would have a bit of an edge compared to the PB2-Plus in some areas (perhaps down low?). Maybe Ed or someone else here can offer an estimate on how two 20-39 PC-Plus subwoofers would compare to a PB2-Plus? :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,584
Messages
5,141,425
Members
144,421
Latest member
ChrisHord
Recent bookmarks
0
Top