Marc W
Auditioning
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2004
- Messages
- 6
I'm considering buying a Pioneer VSX-D914K and I'm soliciting opinions. First a little about me and my room:
- I'm looking for the best sound I can get for under $400, and preferably closer to $300.
- My current speakers are:
JBL 3800 mains (3-way, 8" woofers)
JBL 2600 surrounds (2-way, 6" woofers)
JBL EC-35 Center (3-way, 5" woofers)
Hsu Research STF-2 Sub
No rear center(s) planned at this point, but probably soon.
- The room I'll be setting up my home theatre in is somewhat on the large side -- I'm guesstimating 3400 to 3600 cu. ft. of space in the theatre room alone, plus quite a bit more if you count the adjoining (via a 10' wide opening) kitchen. Not an enormous room, but still fairly sizeable (darn cathedral ceiling ;-). It has wood floors too, fwiw from an acoustical perspective.
- I don't have a huge number of components, so I don't need any special level of connectictivity. Likewise, I don't feel the need for a huge array of fancy features -- I mainly just want the best possible sound I can get.
- My current thinking is that I do want to get DTS 96:24, and I'd also like a 192KHz/24-Bit DAC (vs. 96/24).
I had been strongly considering the Onkyo 601 and the Denon 1804. Both seem to be well-regarded products in my price point, but then I came across the Pioneer VSX-D914K. The Pioneer seems to offer more than the Onkyo or the Denon, but I'd like some help in figuring out how much value the additional features add. For example, the Pioneer offers:
- Motorola 48-Bit DSP. Is this a big deal? Purpotedly, it improves the sound as compared to Pioneer receivers that do not have this feature. I've read at least one professional review that praised the Motorola DSP, and I've also read a review from a guy who directly compared a Motorola DSP-equipped Pioneer to his own (non-Motorola-equipped) Pioneer VSX-D811S, and he attributed the better sound to the Motorola DSP (I currently own a D811S myself). Does anyone have an opinion on the merits of this DSP?
- Pioneer's "Auto MCACC." If I understand correctly, this feature is an automatic version of what I could do myself with a SPL monitor. Am I correct? If so, this feature may add some convenience, but I don't really mind setting up my receiver the long, manual, "hands on" way. After all, how often do you really have to do it? And I actually prefer the "hands on" approach with my HT equipment, but can MCACC do a better job?
- Power. As I stated above, my room is fairly large. I won't be pushing the volume levels through the roof on a regular basis, but I'd at least like the option. According to a review I read on homecinemachoice.com the Denon 1804 can only provide 35 (or so) watts of power to 5 channels, when pushed. I don't think the Onkyo fared much better (although I'm not sure that it was the Onkyo 601 that they tested). There was some data on the VSX-D914K (or on a very similar model?) which measured 80 watts to 5 channels. Sorry, the details on the exact Onkyo and Pioneer models are foggy -- but I'm pretty darn sure that they were, at the least, models that are *very* similar to the ones I'm looking at (i.e. the same "guts"). I realize that homecinemachoice.com's tests do not necessarily reflect the "real world" use of these products (as they themselves stated), but 35 watts vs. 80 watts is a big disparity. Does this translate to a real world advantage for the Pioneer?
Finally, as I mentioned above, my primary criterion is to get the best sound quality in my price point. I realize that sound is very subjective, but if anyone has done a direct comparison audition of the receivers I've listed (or similar offerings by other manufacturers), then please let me know your opinions.
If you've made it this far, then thanks for reading! Brevity has never been a strong point for me. ;-)
Best Regards,
Marc
- I'm looking for the best sound I can get for under $400, and preferably closer to $300.
- My current speakers are:
JBL 3800 mains (3-way, 8" woofers)
JBL 2600 surrounds (2-way, 6" woofers)
JBL EC-35 Center (3-way, 5" woofers)
Hsu Research STF-2 Sub
No rear center(s) planned at this point, but probably soon.
- The room I'll be setting up my home theatre in is somewhat on the large side -- I'm guesstimating 3400 to 3600 cu. ft. of space in the theatre room alone, plus quite a bit more if you count the adjoining (via a 10' wide opening) kitchen. Not an enormous room, but still fairly sizeable (darn cathedral ceiling ;-). It has wood floors too, fwiw from an acoustical perspective.
- I don't have a huge number of components, so I don't need any special level of connectictivity. Likewise, I don't feel the need for a huge array of fancy features -- I mainly just want the best possible sound I can get.
- My current thinking is that I do want to get DTS 96:24, and I'd also like a 192KHz/24-Bit DAC (vs. 96/24).
I had been strongly considering the Onkyo 601 and the Denon 1804. Both seem to be well-regarded products in my price point, but then I came across the Pioneer VSX-D914K. The Pioneer seems to offer more than the Onkyo or the Denon, but I'd like some help in figuring out how much value the additional features add. For example, the Pioneer offers:
- Motorola 48-Bit DSP. Is this a big deal? Purpotedly, it improves the sound as compared to Pioneer receivers that do not have this feature. I've read at least one professional review that praised the Motorola DSP, and I've also read a review from a guy who directly compared a Motorola DSP-equipped Pioneer to his own (non-Motorola-equipped) Pioneer VSX-D811S, and he attributed the better sound to the Motorola DSP (I currently own a D811S myself). Does anyone have an opinion on the merits of this DSP?
- Pioneer's "Auto MCACC." If I understand correctly, this feature is an automatic version of what I could do myself with a SPL monitor. Am I correct? If so, this feature may add some convenience, but I don't really mind setting up my receiver the long, manual, "hands on" way. After all, how often do you really have to do it? And I actually prefer the "hands on" approach with my HT equipment, but can MCACC do a better job?
- Power. As I stated above, my room is fairly large. I won't be pushing the volume levels through the roof on a regular basis, but I'd at least like the option. According to a review I read on homecinemachoice.com the Denon 1804 can only provide 35 (or so) watts of power to 5 channels, when pushed. I don't think the Onkyo fared much better (although I'm not sure that it was the Onkyo 601 that they tested). There was some data on the VSX-D914K (or on a very similar model?) which measured 80 watts to 5 channels. Sorry, the details on the exact Onkyo and Pioneer models are foggy -- but I'm pretty darn sure that they were, at the least, models that are *very* similar to the ones I'm looking at (i.e. the same "guts"). I realize that homecinemachoice.com's tests do not necessarily reflect the "real world" use of these products (as they themselves stated), but 35 watts vs. 80 watts is a big disparity. Does this translate to a real world advantage for the Pioneer?
Finally, as I mentioned above, my primary criterion is to get the best sound quality in my price point. I realize that sound is very subjective, but if anyone has done a direct comparison audition of the receivers I've listed (or similar offerings by other manufacturers), then please let me know your opinions.
If you've made it this far, then thanks for reading! Brevity has never been a strong point for me. ;-)
Best Regards,
Marc