brian__pratt
Agent
- Joined
- May 15, 2002
- Messages
- 31
i sold my primary tv (36" panny hd tau) for one reason: i was tired of dealing with its weight when moving.
so, i'm off to my dealer tomorrow to pick up something LIGHT.
i have looked at the usual LCD and DLP projection units (front projection is not an option yet) and got the following quotes from my dealer:
Panasonic PT-50LC13 50" LCD: $2550
Sony KF42WE610 42" LCD: $2400
Sony KF50WE610 50" LCD: $2800
Samsung (not sure of the model #) 43" DLP: $3000
extended 5 year in-home warranty: $269 (on any of the above)
after looking at the online prices these seem pretty competitive considering it's a B&M store. they don't carry the hitachi line, so that's not an option (but people speak highly of). my question is if the sony price justifies the quality difference (if any) from the panny.
or, if the samsung deserves that much $$$$ over the others, and only for a 42" screen.
ugh. decisions...
so, i'm off to my dealer tomorrow to pick up something LIGHT.
i have looked at the usual LCD and DLP projection units (front projection is not an option yet) and got the following quotes from my dealer:
Panasonic PT-50LC13 50" LCD: $2550
Sony KF42WE610 42" LCD: $2400
Sony KF50WE610 50" LCD: $2800
Samsung (not sure of the model #) 43" DLP: $3000
extended 5 year in-home warranty: $269 (on any of the above)
after looking at the online prices these seem pretty competitive considering it's a B&M store. they don't carry the hitachi line, so that's not an option (but people speak highly of). my question is if the sony price justifies the quality difference (if any) from the panny.
or, if the samsung deserves that much $$$$ over the others, and only for a 42" screen.
ugh. decisions...