What's new

Movie theaters poised for comeback in 2002 (1 Viewer)

Adam Lenhardt

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2001
Messages
27,031
Location
Albany, NY
Movie theaters poised for comeback in 2002
Reuters
Dec 28 2001 8:30PM
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - After a long, cold intermission, the nation's beleaguered movie theaters are seeing the reels of business turn again, thanks to ogres, boy wizards, adult sorcerers and the shuttering of unprofitable locations.
A happy ending finally seems to be in sight for an industry hit hard by overbuilding, with many theater operators posting their first meaningful bottom-line gains in years.
Operators have helped themselves by shutting down less stellar theaters, but a boost has also come from recent box office hits that include "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone," "The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring," and "Shrek."
Investors have been applauding the fledgling turnaround this year, bidding up some companies' stock by as much as 350 percent.
"Most of the companies have basically gone through a restructuring," said John Maxwell, an entertainment analyst at BNP Paribas. "As companies complete the restructuring process, they're going to come out and emerge ... as healthier companies. They'll be more profitable."
A showcase of the industry's budding recovery is AMC Entertainment Inc., operator of the AMC theater chain and one of the few industry players that managed to avoid bankruptcy.
For the quarter ended Sept. 27, the company reported a net profit of $19 million -- a marked improvement from a net loss of $5.5 million for the comparable period the year before.
Even more telling, AMC reported operating income -- an important gauge of a company's health -- of $34.4 million in its latest quarter, a quantum leap from $1.3 million a year ago.
Over the same period, Kansas City, Missouri-based AMC opened five new theaters with 92 screens, but closed 20 older or underperforming theaters with 139 screens.
Investors have cheered the turnaround for much of 2001, bidding up AMC stock from a low of $2.88 a year ago to a close of $12.19 on Thursday. It was off 14 cents at $12.05 on the American Stock Exchange at mid-afternoon.
GREW TOO FAST
Other companies have reported similar turnarounds, though many remain in bankruptcy as they nurse themselves back to health.
Carmike Cinemas Inc., which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2000, reported net income of $11.1 million for its quarter ended Sept. 30, compared with a loss of $2.1 million in the year-ago quarter. The Columbus, Georgia-based company's operating income nearly tripled to $15.1 million from $5.3 million over the same period.
Loews Cineplex Corp., another major operator that filed for bankruptcy in February, reported a net loss of $9.9 million for the quarter ended Aug. 31, compared with a $55.5 million loss a year before. Operating income shot up to $15.5 million from a $31 million loss a year ago.
New York-based Loews said it had 276 theaters at the end of August, down from 376 a year before. Carmike's theater count fell to 329 from 390 over the same period.
Maxwell said that AMC, Carmike, Loews and other operators all fell victim to overbuilding during the 1990s.
"The industry wasn't the problem," he said. "It was the way these guys went about their growth program. They grew too fast."
Indeed, many of the nation's major theater operators added substantial capacity during the decade, on the assumption that newer theaters with state-of-the-art projection and sound systems would boost attendance.
Attendance did grow, but not nearly fast enough to justify the millions of dollars that theaters spent on new multiplexes. As a result, many theater operators found themselves saddled with huge debt loads that ultimately forced them into bankruptcy.
As they return to health, however, most companies should be able to emerge from bankruptcy in 2002 as meaner and leaner entities, Maxwell said.
A boost should come from a strong national box office that, despite the economic slowdown, is expected to generate revenues of more than $8 billion in 2001 compared with $7.7 million last year, according to Exhibitor Relations Co.
"The underlying business fundamentals remain relatively healthy," Maxwell said. "You combine that with a stronger box office and the lower screen counts ... and you're seeing an industry where more healthy companies begin to emerge."
Reuters/Variety
Does this mean theaters will finally stop raising ticket prices?
 

JohnS

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2001
Messages
4,957
Location
Las Vegas
Real Name
John Steffens
Personally, I think 2002 will even be bigger for theaters.
Harry Potter 2
Star Wars 2
LOTR 2
Spiderman
Scary Movie 3
Austin Powers 3
Star Trek 10
The list goes on and on....
 

Seth Paxton

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 5, 1998
Messages
7,585
If you go back into the Monsters, Potter, FOTR box office thread you will see that I predicted these stories starting up following these releases.

These dipshits don't even know their own product. Are any of us really surprised that all 3 films made at least $150m and made the 4th qtr into a huge movie season.

Now who thinks this is a "trend" and who thinks it's just about 3 good family/cult fan base films coming out. Each had a lead in reason for going huge, 2 were the books, the other was Toy Story 1&2 and Bugs Life. If Hannibal could do business off of SotLambs, where's the surprise with Monsters?

Then you have AOTC next spring...gee, will there be good box-office around that time??? Will it mean the theater business is "back"? Hell no.

They haven't even begun to feel the results of back-stabbing the public this summer with crap. People will only be burned so often. Eventually the "big" picture draw is going to wain unless they can earn some of it with quality.

Big pix make money now because of things like Star Wars, Raiders, etc. Those pix delivered so people learned to believe H'wood hype. The last 2-3 years have been about the hype being BS and I think the public is going to catch on.
 

Chuck Mayer

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2001
Messages
8,516
Location
Northern Virginia
Real Name
Chuck Mayer
Seth, I agree on most of those counts. Of course 2002 will be a big year. Heck, 2003 will be a big year (with The Matrix, LOTR, X-Men 2)!
Hollywood almost always learns the wrong lesson. Look at Titanic...it was huge. Those fools assumed it made all those bones because it was emotional spectacle with good-looking leads, which was only the wrapping. So we got a bunch of hokey tripe to coattail it. The core of the original was well-done, with passion behind the camera. As much as studios wish the moviegoing public couldn't tell the difference, a movie feels better and resonates more if the people making it believe in it. They make us believe in it. The studios want a formula to make money. They can't do it, but they learned hype can at least turn a profit. But, (un)fortunately for us, this summer poked a hole in that theory. Too many moviegoers burned too many times.
To summarize: journalists rarely get it right because they never go beyond the surface. That would be too much work:)
Take care,
Chuck
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,061
Messages
5,129,861
Members
144,281
Latest member
papill6n
Recent bookmarks
0
Top