What's new

Oscar Movies Review #3: Chang - A drama of the wilderness (1 Viewer)

battlebeast

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
4,470
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
Real Name
Warren
CHANG: A DRAMA OF THE WILDERNESS (1927)

Director: Merian C. Cooper, Ernest B. Schoedsack

Cast: The Family Kru

Oscars won: 0

Nominations: 1



The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences considers Wings the first Best Picture winner, and the two other films in that category, 7th Heaven and The Racket Best Picture nominees. For the first Oscar year, there were two categories of "best pictures"; the second category was labelled "Unique and artistic production," which included Chang, as well as Sunrise and The Crowd.

Chang certainly fits into the latter category; it is one of the most unique films I have ever seen. on the cover to Fox's Sunrise, they claim it to be a "best picture" winner. I consider the latter category best picture nominees, too.



Set in the wilds of northern Siam (now Thailand), Chang tells the story of the family Kru: Kru, the father; Chantui, his wife; Nah, Kru's son, and Ladah, his daughter. There is also a baby, and Bimbo, the pet monkey.



The story - only 64 minutes long - starts as we meet Kru and his family and animals. Kru is worried about leopards and tigers in the area, which may attack his most precious resources: his livestock.



Kru does indeed loose livestock to jungle cats. Horrifyingly, we see majestic leopards and tigers shot dead on camera. No tricks. No faking. two tigers and three leopards are slaughtered for our entertainment.



As sad as that is, the story moves on. Animal hunts, a trip to the local village and a pet monkey who is the comic relief are uniquely shown in a documentary sort of way. Indeed, this could very well have been a documentary, but the directors recreated some events to get the perfect shots for their Hollywood picture.



The movie culminates in a stampede of elephants. A wondrous sight caught on film. But not only that: the whole movie is filled with amazing footage of wildlife. Tigers, monitor lizards, bears, leopards, monkeys, elephants, etc, all captured as even National Geographic might do.



This is a Hollywood film, and was filmed as such. But the wilds of Siam become a character of their own. Although staged as a Hollywood film, this is a very true to life historical record of life at that time in the remote jungle primeval. I hope PETA never views this film.



The film is in desperate need of restoration. That said, it is very watchable. I found the film extremely engrossing. I guess because I'm partial to documentaries.



The film's score is newly recorded by Fong Naam. "In the late '60s, a young American by the name of Bruce Gaston arrived in Thailand: his ambition, to avoid the draft. During his stay, Gaston became captivated by the music of Thailand, studied its techniques, and decided not to return to the United States. Together with Boonyong Kethong he formed an instrumental ensemble known as Fong Naam, which is now one of the best known pi-pha ensembles in the nation. Although the music Fong Naam plays is rooted in classical tradition, it is also porous and accepts absorbs outside influences. Fong Naam have experimented with jazz and rock."



The music sounds like traditional south east Asian music, and compliments the film very well.



Overall, this is a film that shows us a historical record of life in that era and that part of the world. Staged for Hollywood or not, it still is a glimpse into our past. Oh, and if you have the DVD listen to the commentary by Rudy Behlmer. One of the best I've ever heard.



Film: 4/5

Picture: 2/5

Audio 4.5/5



RECOMMENDED
 

Matt Hough

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
26,200
Location
Charlotte, NC
Real Name
Matt Hough
Thanks for the views on this unusual (and to me unknown apart from its Oscar nomination status) movie.
 

bujaki

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
7,140
Location
Richardson, TX
Real Name
Jose Ortiz-Marrero
I have the (unwatched) Milestone Collection DVD of this film. However, I did see a 35mm print of it, probably during the Paramount retrospective at MoMA in 1972. My recollection of it is, therefore, vague. But I agree with Warren: it is recommended viewing.
 

moviepas

Supporting Actor
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
774
This film was one of a series that came out on Laserdisc, I think thru Lumivision, and was probably on NTSC VHS and I did watch those discs. Tabu was one that has made it to Blu Ray.
 

Didier R

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
196
Real Name
Didier Rochefort
Why are you so obsessed with Oscar nominated movies? This is the guy who posted the following when WAC announced fantastic noir Out of the Past blu-ray.

"THIS is on Blu Ray, but none of your Best Picture nominees???"

How truly embarassing.
 

Cine_Capsulas

Second Unit
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
416
Real Name
Patrick
Didier R said:
Why are you so obsessed with Oscar nominated movies? This is the guy who posted the following when WAC announced fantastic noir Out of the Past blu-ray."THIS is on Blu Ray, but none of your Best Picture nominees???"How truly embarassing.
Note from Moderator: image removed.
 

bujaki

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
7,140
Location
Richardson, TX
Real Name
Jose Ortiz-Marrero
Warren, you and I have seen them all. Yes, it's an odd obsession, but who in this forum is not obsessed about XXX? Do we understand that not all winners and nominees are worthy of "serious" discussion? Absolutely! So, keep up your hobby, enjoy it, and ignore those who criticize you. They, too, have their foibles, I'm sure.
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,386
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
Nice write-up, Warren -- been enjoying the ones you've posted so far and will continue to enjoy the ones to follow. This is one of those movies that not only have I never seen it, I don't think I'd even heard about it before.

I'd be very curious to know, when you finish each year's nominees, which one of the nominees in a particular year was your favorite, and if you think the Academy got it right or wrong in their final selection of the winner.
 

battlebeast

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
4,470
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
Real Name
Warren
Josh Steinberg said:
Nice write-up, Warren -- been enjoying the ones you've posted so far and will continue to enjoy the ones to follow. This is one of those movies that not only have I never seen it, I don't think I'd even heard about it before.I'd be very curious to know, when you finish each year's nominees, which one of the nominees in a particular year was your favorite, and if you think the Academy got it right or wrong in their final selection of the winner.
For those of you who have chosen to be nice, and not insult me, thank you! :)JOSH> I was planning on doing a year wrap up for each year. I'll include a bunch of stuff!Thanks again everyone, and yes.. I plan on continuing until the end, despite what anyone thinks or says. :)
 

DaveF

Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
28,772
Location
Catfisch Cinema
Real Name
Dave
Didier R said:
Why are you so obsessed with Oscar nominated movies?
There is no value in attacking the enthusiasm of other members; all the more so when they put the effort into careful viewings and detailed reviews and discussions on HTF.Trolling of members is unwelcome in HTF. A second offense will result in loss of membership privileges.
 

David Weicker

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
4,675
Real Name
David
I am thankful for your reviews and your passion.As for the Oscars themselves, I personally do find value in them.IMO, none of the winners are undeserving or bad films. That being said, I do feel that in many years there were better films that should have won. But none of the winners shouldn't have been, at least, up for the prize.What I like about this series is that it allows us to get more second hand knowledge of the non-winners.I am personally less generous about the quality of the other nominees. While in some years the whole slate is terrific, in other years (especially since they recently expanded to 10), there are some films that not only shouldn't have been nominated, but IMO are awful films.So please keep going.And thank you
 

battlebeast

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
4,470
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
Real Name
Warren
CHANG is an oddball film. Unique, yes; artistic? Not really. Listening to the commentary... It's incredible what they went through to get this picture filmed. The two directors lived in the wilds of northern Siam for a year and a half... And for Four months before they even started filming. The area was so remote it took them sixteen days after leaving the only train line to the north to get to the location. They used hand cranked cameras, and only themselves did any filming. The wife of Kru was not his actual wife, but a woman from the village. Still, she did an admirable job. On the DVD, they have a three minute segment they transferred to color. They attempted to either transfer the film to color, or remake it in the 1950s. They abandoned both concepts.In posting this review, I've actually alerted someone to this film. Maybe they will watch it. Maybe not. But I'm glad *many* of you all are enjoying my reviews.And I do agree that not all films nominated are worthy of the title of "best picture nominee"; I can't wait to get to the 1950s!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,068
Messages
5,129,987
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top