Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

MGM Press Release: BOND 50 (Blu-ray)

MGM Fox

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
1768 replies to this topic

#1461 of 1769 OFFLINE   HDvision

HDvision

    Supporting Actor



  • 982 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 11 2007
  • Real Name:David
  • LocationPandora

Posted December 05 2012 - 03:42 AM

OHMSS suffers from a too bright picture, especially in the Piz Gloria studio interiors shots. I agree they are all a step up from the DVDs, but these transfers are from 2005/2006. They are totally antiquated as far as Blu-ray goes. Those were all shots with glorious Panavision cameras, by top notch DPs. They should all look way better than the recent Terminator looks, and they don't.


#1462 of 1769 OFFLINE   FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン



  • 5,027 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted December 05 2012 - 09:35 AM

Originally Posted by HDvision 

OHMSS suffers from a too bright picture,


Contrast boosting, it removes detail that should be seen and gives the illusion of a better image ( on televisions ) than it actually is, a good new 4K scan with minimal clean up would yield far more impressive results.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#1463 of 1769 OFFLINE   brioni

brioni

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 122 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2006

Posted December 05 2012 - 10:22 AM

If you have time to read a review of someone watching through rose tinted glasses then look no further than here: http://www.avforums....61/blu-ray.html

#1464 of 1769 OFFLINE   Osato

Osato

    Screenwriter



  • 2,053 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 07 2001

Posted December 05 2012 - 12:45 PM

Thanks for the posts and great discussion. I'm watching FYEO right now. It looks very good, but again I do wonder how it would look with a 4K scan. I wonder if all of the news about 4K and 8K coming if MGM and Fox decided to release the Bond 50 set with minor tweaks based on the prior UE DVD releases.. Maybe by the time Bond 24 is out they will be working on 4K or 8K transfers for the films at that time. It's funny to think that Lowry still was unable to get the transfers right and that there are still audio issues on some of the films. Overall I am still very happy with the set. However there's a part of me that thinks now they could look even better if better scanning was done. Crazy. It's also unfortunate that there is not a standard for restorations and remastering. Instead most of the time the projects are handled by how much studios are willing to spend rather then how to make the film look as good and as true as it should. I don't think it was MGM's intention to skimp on the transfers and audio. They went all out in 2005 for all of this work, however we are seeing some of the downside now and also as mentioned in another post these transfers are 7+ years old and if they were done now a different approach may have been used.

#1465 of 1769 OFFLINE   Osato

Osato

    Screenwriter



  • 2,053 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 07 2001

Posted December 05 2012 - 01:03 PM

So MGM must've limited Lowry on the scanning and really only the 4K ones were taken from the negative scans? Or were the other films (at 2K) scanned at a lower rate by Lowry? Hmm. Anyway... Interesting comparison comments on TMWTGG which is a 2K scan.. http://bluray.highde..._goldengun.html The Video: Sizing Up the Picture When MGM contracted Lowry Digital to remaster all of the Bond movies for the 2006 Ultimate Edition DVDs, the company was unfortunately not able to strike new 4k film scans for every title. Whether due to budget, resources or other pressures, many of the films were sourced from older high-def masters that Lowry attempted to clean up with dirt and scratch removal, grain management and other digital tweaking. The results of those efforts were hit-or-miss, depending on the quality of the existing masters. Some looked better than others. 'The Man with the Golden Gun' is one such title. The Blu-ray was not derived from a new 4k scan. Fortunately, despite this, the disc came out looking pretty good. As he had for 'Live and Let Die', Guy Hamilton shot 'Golden Gun' at a 1.85:1 aspect ratio. This would be the last Bond picture composed for that narrower format. (Most are photographed for "scope" 2.35:1.) The Blu-ray's 1080p/AVC MPEG-4 transfer is quite sharp and detailed. The picture is bright and vividly colorful, with good contrast and shadow detail. As is common for the Lowry process, grain has been mostly dialed down without negatively affecting other picture detail. However, the image has a bit of a gritty texture, and isn't quite up to the same standard as the titles that received newer film scans. Dark scenes and shadows are distractingly noisy at times. Some edge ringing artifacts from artificial sharpening also occur every so often, but aren't too disastrous. If not perfect, this is a fairly nice-looking disc for the most part.

#1466 of 1769 OFFLINE   Ray H

Ray H

    Producer



  • 3,481 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 13 2002
  • Real Name:Ray
  • LocationNJ

Posted December 06 2012 - 03:06 PM

Unfortunately, all of the titles from the 80s on look unspectacular but passable.
"Here's looking at you, kid."

 


#1467 of 1769 OFFLINE   Lord Dalek

Lord Dalek

    Screenwriter



  • 2,167 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2005

Posted December 06 2012 - 11:26 PM

Originally Posted by Ray H 

Unfortunately, all of the titles from the 80s on look unspectacular but passable.


Living Daylights and License to Kill look great.



#1468 of 1769 OFFLINE   Reed Grele

Reed Grele

    Screenwriter



  • 1,071 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Reed Grele
  • LocationBeacon Falls, CT

Posted December 09 2012 - 07:30 AM

Look what's parked at the used car lot at the end of my street: I wonder if it's for sale? Oddjob was nowhere to be seen.

#1469 of 1769 OFFLINE   Charles Smith

Charles Smith

    Extremely Talented Member



  • 4,263 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 27 2007
  • LocationNor'east

Posted December 09 2012 - 09:46 AM

What's it still doing down there?  By now you should have been posting pictures of it in your driveway!!     Posted Image



#1470 of 1769 OFFLINE   Reed Grele

Reed Grele

    Screenwriter



  • 1,071 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Reed Grele
  • LocationBeacon Falls, CT

Posted December 09 2012 - 10:11 AM

What's it still doing down there?  By now you should have been posting pictures of it in your driveway!!     :cool:

Looking it all over, it needs quite a bit of restoration before I'd park it in my driveway. As it sits, might make a good planter though. :P

#1471 of 1769 OFFLINE   Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer



  • 4,946 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted January 06 2013 - 07:09 AM

Making my way through the set chronologically, this weekend I watched For Your Eyes Only and Octopussy on blu-ray, on the big screen (108"). FYEO I remember fondly, having seen it multiple times in the theater in 1981 and many times since. I haven't watched it since the initial blu-ray release in '08. It is every bit as good as I recall, and takes the #2 spot in my favorite Roger Moore movies (behind the Spy Who Loved Me).


Octopussy I also remember fondly. When it came out in the summer of 1983, about two weeks after Return of the Jedi, I loved it, and had a hard time admitting I liked it better than ROTJ. I haven't watched Octopussy since the initial DVDs were released, around 1999-2000, so it's been a long time. My memories didn't hold up. While I still found it to be charming and exciting in places, it is clear that the series was now becoming a parody, with far too many winks at the audience and punchlines. (Between this, ROTJ and Superman III, I have to ask "WTF was going on in 1983?!?!) The sequence in India is one embarassing stereotype after another. I did enjoy the sequences in Berlin and those at the East-West crossing. The whole movie should have had more of those. General Orlov was a good character, who doesn't get much to do until the last quarter of the film. Nothing against Rita Coolidge, but using her for the title song wasn't very inspired. They should have recruited The Police, then at the top of their game.

I thought the video on both films was very good, with FYEO looking better than Octopussy, which looked good, but just didn't scream out "Wow!" the way the early Bond films did.  (I know, I know, films of very different eras.) Next, I will muddle through A View To A Kill - my least favorite until I saw Die Another Day - which I have not seen since the days of VHS, so it has easily been 20 years or more since i sat through that. Then, The Living Daylights, which, in 1987, was one of my all time favorite Bond movies. Let's see if it holds up.



#1472 of 1769 ONLINE   Bryan Tuck

Bryan Tuck

    Screenwriter



  • 1,540 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2002

Posted January 06 2013 - 07:31 AM

AVTAK was always one of my least favorites as well, but when I watched it again recently, I was pleasantly surprised. There are definitely some silly things in it, and Roger Moore (by his own admission) was really too old for the part by then, but overall it was a little better than I remembered.
"Flying a plane is no different from riding a bicycle; it's just a lot harder to put baseball cards in the spokes."

#1473 of 1769 OFFLINE   Mikey1969

Mikey1969

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 108 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 13 2012

Posted January 06 2013 - 11:12 PM

Despite some lapses in taste (some glaring) and some elements that don't really work, it still holds together quite well. This was my first. Bond film I watched in a theater so I've always had a soft spot for it.

#1474 of 1769 OFFLINE   HDvision

HDvision

    Supporting Actor



  • 982 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 11 2007
  • Real Name:David
  • LocationPandora

Posted January 07 2013 - 06:35 AM

Whiskas?



#1475 of 1769 OFFLINE   Osato

Osato

    Screenwriter



  • 2,053 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 07 2001

Posted January 31 2013 - 09:25 AM

My mistake. The Moore commentary is still there. : )

#1476 of 1769 OFFLINE   mikeyhitchfan

mikeyhitchfan

    Second Unit



  • 481 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2012
  • Real Name:Mike
  • LocationCosta Mesa CA

Posted February 02 2013 - 03:58 AM

Finally got to see the documentary Everything or Nothing in HD on Netflix streaming. Very well done! There were things I didn't know and a few things that were left out (like the 1967 Casino Royale), but overall a great overview of the series. It's also a MGM/Columbia produced film, so I must wonder again..WHY wasn't in included on the bonus disc of the Bond 50 box set?



#1477 of 1769 OFFLINE   Sumnernor

Sumnernor

    Supporting Actor



  • 831 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 18 2007
  • Real Name:Sumner Northcutt
  • LocationMunich, Germany

Posted February 02 2013 - 07:47 AM

I found this on Amaz-UK:


http://www.amazon.co...=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE


I notice that there are no sub-titles- May be if reissued elsewhere it will have them.



#1478 of 1769 OFFLINE   Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer



  • 4,946 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted February 02 2013 - 08:25 AM

Originally Posted by Sumnernor 

I found this on Amaz-UK:


http://www.amazon.co...=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE


I notice that there are no sub-titles- May be if reissued elsewhere it will have them.


So far, no US release dates on the horizon. I would have thought it would coincide with the Skyfall disc, but that's not happening.


BTW, I recently watched The Living Daylights on blu from the box and was pleasantly surprised that it did, in fact, live up to how good I remembered it. The transfer was great, IMO.



#1479 of 1769 OFFLINE   Worth

Worth

    Screenwriter



  • 1,178 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2009

Posted February 02 2013 - 10:08 AM

Everything or Nothing is currently available in HD on Netflix streaming.
Sealed with a curse as sharp as a knife. Doomed is your soul and damned is your life.

#1480 of 1769 OFFLINE   Sumnernor

Sumnernor

    Supporting Actor



  • 831 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 18 2007
  • Real Name:Sumner Northcutt
  • LocationMunich, Germany

Posted February 03 2013 - 01:25 AM

I bought the Bond 50 Blu-rays disks from Amazon-uk. I notice on my disks, the region codes are  printed. For example "Dr No" - ABC ... "Casino Royale"  -  ABC, the Bonus disk - ABC and the last film  "Quantum of Solace " - B.


I would be interested what was printed on the Blu-ray disks for people who bought the whole set from Amazon-Com in the US? Not so important, For people who may have bought the German version - what region codes were printed on their disks?


Thank you







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: MGM, Fox

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users