Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo

Examples: Good 5.1 remixes and Bad 5.1 remixes


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#1 of 29 OFFLINE   Eric Gripp

Eric Gripp

    Agent



  • 36 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 22 2005

Posted December 12 2006 - 10:17 AM

Why are some considered really great and others considered less than great? I know that Superman: The Movie, Jaws, and Star Wars have 5.1 remixes that a lot of people don't care for. Why is that? Is a 5.1 that a majority consider really good have all the original elements?

#2 of 29 OFFLINE   Lord Dalek

Lord Dalek

    Screenwriter



  • 2,256 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2005

Posted December 12 2006 - 10:26 AM

I suppose. Mostly just the idea of remixing older mono or 2.0 LT/RT films seems a bit repulsive to a lot of folks since it doesn't really add to the experience and ultimately sounds artificial and thin. Occasionally you get a good one like Gone With the Wind or Once Upon A Time in the West but mostly they're what I call "fudge tracks".

#3 of 29 OFFLINE   Matt Czyz

Matt Czyz

    Supporting Actor



  • 902 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2003

Posted December 12 2006 - 10:52 AM

Radiers of the Lost Ark came out pretty well.

#4 of 29 ONLINE   MatthewA

MatthewA

    Lead Actor



  • 6,573 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000
  • Real Name:Matthew
  • LocationSalinas, CA

Posted December 12 2006 - 11:34 AM

Because some remixes are actually good, and some are just plain lousy. Disney's 5.1 remixes are just mono spread over five channels, except for Bedknobs and Broomsticks, where they went back to the multichannel music stems and the mono dialogue and effects stems and mixed them together. Why can't they do this for other films? The 5.1 Grease remix is a tragedy. They must have had all the original sound elements to do it right, but not enough time (done for the 1998 re-issue). The backup singers on the 2nd verse of You're the One that I Want are out of sync. Then there's the added foley. Pre-stereo era films (before 1952) shouldn't be remixed to 5.1, considering the recording technology didn't exist except for MGM's experiments. I only support the idea of remixing if the remix does not add any elements recorded after the fact (bearing the existence of the original sound elements), if the music was recorded in a way that it would support a stereo mix, and if the original mono track is included.

Enough is enough, Disney. No more evasions or excuses. We DEMAND the release Song of the South on Blu-ray along with the uncut version of Bedknobs and Broomsticks on Blu-ray. I am going to boycott The Walt Disney Company until then. And while you're at it, PLEASE stop dropping DVD/laserdisc extras from Blu-ray releases of other films.


#5 of 29 OFFLINE   Eric Gripp

Eric Gripp

    Agent



  • 36 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 22 2005

Posted December 12 2006 - 11:57 AM

Great answers. This is exactly the kind of information/opinions I was hoping to hear.

#6 of 29 OFFLINE   Bo_Darville

Bo_Darville

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 67 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 27 2006

Posted December 12 2006 - 03:22 PM

+1 also, some of the gunshots in the terminator sound like they are blazing across the living room, and that was originally mono i believe

#7 of 29 OFFLINE   Vincent_P

Vincent_P

    Screenwriter



  • 1,780 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted December 12 2006 - 03:35 PM

Dario Argento's SUSPIRIA is a textbook example of a bad 5.1 (or in this case, actually 6.1 ) remix IMO. When SUSPIRIA was released theatrically in 1977, select prints were not only printed in glorious IB Technicolor, but featured 4-channel discreet magnetic stereo sound to boot. By all accounts, seeing a Technicolor, 4-channel stereo print of SUSPIRIA theatrically in 1977 was quite the cinematic experience. The letterboxed Image laserdisc release of SUSPIRIA approximated the aural experience fairly well, offering a PCM 2-channel downmix of the 4-track discreet original that was compatible with Dolby Pro-Logic Surround decoders... Now, you'd THINK that with the advent of DVD and the ability of Dolby Digital to encode a 4.0 track that the original 4-channel mix from 1977 would be preserved on the DVD, but such is not the case. What we get on the Anchor Bay DVD is a 6.1 remix in both Dolby Digital EX and DTS-ES, and a 2.0 surround downconversion of the remix. No original sound mix included (unless you count the Dolby Digital 2.0 downmix of the 4-channel Italian dubbed soundtrack)... The problem with the remixed soundtrack? It has a LOT of errors, from missing music cues, to the wrong sound levels for several of the music cues, to missing sound effects, and even missing dialogue. This could all have been averted had the original 4-channel mix been preserved on the DVD as a viewing option, but it was not, so all we have to choose from are the remixed tracks with all the mistakes, or a 2-channel downmix of the Italian dubbed track with no subtitles. Vincent

#8 of 29 OFFLINE   Carter of Mars

Carter of Mars

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 245 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 2006

Posted December 12 2006 - 05:05 PM

All of the Indiana Jones films were re-mixed from the original 6-track masters used on the 70mm prints at the time of each films initial release. They weren't re-thought tracks like Superman and Jaws.

#9 of 29 OFFLINE   Mark Anthony

Mark Anthony

    Second Unit



  • 449 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 25 2001

Posted December 12 2006 - 08:31 PM

The discrepency is down to a huge variety of factors, do all the original source elements survive - in a decent condition, how was it originally recorded, if the music score was recorded in stereo do the master tapes survive - esp. if it was released in mono theatrically and finally whose doing, and supervising, the re-mix.... Just because it was originally released in mono doesn't mean the 5.1 re-mix is automatically bad - Conan The Barbarian in a number of peoples opinions is a perfect example of a mono re-mix done right as the music score stereo elements were available, the few stereo effects are not in your face and the impact of that score, in stereo, breathes new life into the film. I personally think they did a great job with Superman, again considering the condition of the sound elements and the type of film it is, the new mix sounds more in line with how I'd expect Superman to sound, the original '78 mix was by the producer's admission a rush job at best and an early Dolby film regardless. The Good, Bad and Ugly re-mix could have been amazing, subtle with use of the stereophonic score and re-purposed sound effects - but the use of stereophonic dialogue really distracts and for me pulls me out of the film, a great shame - For a few dollars more is the same. Another title that has been brought up is Vertigo, that in my opinion just need's a bit of further tweaking to be another great example of what can be done when you have questionable elements. But there are cases such as The Great Escape where it's advertised as 5.1, but it's just mono repurposed to 6 channels, when you have no stereo elements I can't see or hear the point of doing this.. M

#10 of 29 OFFLINE   Phil_O

Phil_O

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 135 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 10 2002

Posted December 12 2006 - 11:13 PM

I was a disappointed in the Pulp Fiction DTS mix. Saw this a few weeks ago, and IMO there was no reason to even include the DTS track, ie no "big" special effects, special ambience effects or anything. Awesome movie though.
Denon 3805 | Paradigm Monitor 5's front, CC370, ADP150 rear | Mirage BPS400 sub (the "Legend" I call it! - going strong since 1998!) | Toshiba SD DVD player | Tons of DVDs/CDs! | Nad c541i CDP | Main computer has 1080p 24" monitor, Logitech 5.1 system

#11 of 29 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,923 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted December 12 2006 - 11:39 PM

"Vertigo" is fine in music and dialogue. Too many effects were added (improperly), and Foley needs to be toned down. RAH

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#12 of 29 OFFLINE   Ken_McAlinden

Ken_McAlinden

    Producer



  • 6,121 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 20 2001
  • Real Name:Kenneth McAlinden
  • LocationLivonia, MI USA

Posted December 13 2006 - 01:15 AM

You have probably covered this before, but I cannot remember the answer. Foley issues completely aside, did the folks who did the remix for the restoration have a usable isolated dialog track? If they did not, the fact that I have to ask the question should be considered a compliment to them. Keeping the discussion going, I am of the opinion that all of the 5.1 remixes that were done for Warner's last iteration of the Stanley Kubrick Collection are darn near perfect. I imagine "The Shining" must have been very difficult with all of the edit pieces integrated into the music track, but it manages to keep the flavor of the original mix while opening up the soundstage and improving the fidelity and dynamic range. Regards,
Ken McAlinden
Livonia, MI USA

#13 of 29 OFFLINE   Patrick McCart

Patrick McCart

    Lead Actor



  • 7,483 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001
  • Real Name:Patrick McCart
  • LocationAlpharetta, GA, USA

Posted December 13 2006 - 03:29 AM

While it's adapted from a 70mm 6-track magnetic mix, my personal favorite 5.1 remix is Warner's Around the World in 80 Days (1956). Between the fidelity being virtually perfect and the directional sound... wow. Disney did an incredible job on Snow White, Dumbo, and Bambi for their 5.1 tracks. However, I can't stand the Mary Poppins 5.1 (the original 2.0 stereo is fantastic). I also don't care for the 5.1 remix for Some Like It Hot (on the original 1-disc SE)... too echoey. The old 5.1 track on Gone with the Wind was hard to listen to, but I like the 4-disc SE's much better.

#14 of 29 OFFLINE   JimTravis

JimTravis

    Extra



  • 17 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 12 2006

Posted December 13 2006 - 05:56 AM

Disney's 5.1 remixes are just mono spread over five channels, except for Bedknobs and Broomsticks, where they went back to the multichannel music stems and the mono dialogue and effects stems and mixed them together. Why can't they do this for other films? I thought the Disney 5.1 mix on titles like Bambi, Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Lady and the Tramp (etc etc.) were wonderful. I think the philosophy there was to give you the experience of hearing these classic films the way they would sound now in a theater, NOT how the films would sound if they were engineered today. The Mary Poppins 5.1 mix is awful because it tries to modernize the soundtrack with new foley f/x, "de-hissing", and similar tricks. Bambi is flat-out gorgeous, because you get the score support in the rear channels with the dialog and f/x in the front, just as it should be for a film 60 years old. One example of a "modernized" 5.1 remix by Disney is 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea. It retains its original theatrical sensibility while opening up the soundtrack for LFE f/x. There are some new localized stereo examples that can be jarring, but on the whole, its a gem (much like the movie and the DVD).

#15 of 29 ONLINE   MatthewA

MatthewA

    Lead Actor



  • 6,573 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000
  • Real Name:Matthew
  • LocationSalinas, CA

Posted December 13 2006 - 07:04 AM

Some of these were stereo originally. I had forgotten about these remixes, but I agree that they are not bad. The bad ones I mean are things like Vault Disney remixes of mono into 5.1 fat mono. Either remix it right or don't do it at all. BTW, I have not bought the Little Mermaid because of the horrid remix.

Enough is enough, Disney. No more evasions or excuses. We DEMAND the release Song of the South on Blu-ray along with the uncut version of Bedknobs and Broomsticks on Blu-ray. I am going to boycott The Walt Disney Company until then. And while you're at it, PLEASE stop dropping DVD/laserdisc extras from Blu-ray releases of other films.


#16 of 29 OFFLINE   JimTravis

JimTravis

    Extra



  • 17 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 12 2006

Posted December 13 2006 - 07:11 AM

I bought it, but haven't spun it yet. I've bought an insane amount of discs this last month that I haven't heard yet.

#17 of 29 OFFLINE   Jeff Jacobson

Jeff Jacobson

    Screenwriter



  • 2,116 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 24 2001

Posted December 13 2006 - 02:56 PM

The Transformers DVD Season Sets made by Rhino had horrible 5.1 remixes. They just added in a bunch of really lame sound effects that quite frequently drowned out the dialogue.

#18 of 29 OFFLINE   walter o

walter o

    Supporting Actor



  • 852 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 06 2004

Posted December 13 2006 - 05:04 PM

I read there is some sound effects missing in the recent TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE's 5.1 mix.

#19 of 29 OFFLINE   Joe Caps

Joe Caps

    Screenwriter



  • 1,946 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2000

Posted December 13 2006 - 10:01 PM

Vertigo I thought was a complete mess, so I was delighted when Universal reissued vertigo in their Hitchcock box with the original mono mix. My Fair lady still lacks good sound and yes I know the masters are missing, etc. However, if lack of high end is a problem, you dont' help it by pumping up bass, filter ing more high end and ending loads of reverb to all the music. Camelot - Warners had a great idea - take a mix nominated for an Academy award for best sound - that was originally stereo to begin with. Then remix from scratch, even when told by the original soundmixer that not all the elements exist to do such a job. No problem, we'll just use some alternate and incorrect tracks and who will be the wiser? ; This atrosity has never been fixed.

#20 of 29 OFFLINE   Brendon

Brendon

    Second Unit



  • 259 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 15 1999

Posted December 13 2006 - 10:18 PM

Given the number of classic animated Disney films, I'm suprised that Fantasia hasn't been mentioned. The 5,1 tracks, both DD & DTS, are wonderful. I suspect it helped no end that the original 'Fantasound' system was multichannel; whilst the Fantasound channel configuration/placement may not map precisely onto modern 5.1 systems (3/2/.1), the 5.1 remix of Fantasia does prove to be a significant step up from previous Dolby Surround mixes. EDIT: Deems Taylor narration issues not withstanding!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users