-

Jump to content



Photo

THE WIZARD OF OZ to get Ultra Resolution Treatment


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
72 replies to this topic

#1 of 73 Andrew Budgell

Andrew Budgell

    Screenwriter

  • 1,195 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2002

Posted November 12 2004 - 03:14 PM

This came to me via a Judy Garland online discussion group:

National Film Theatre, NFT1

Following a year of the National Film Theatre's Digital Futures programme, supported by the Digital Test Bed, which has included Casablanca, Singin' In The Rain, Brief Encounter and A Zed and Two Noughts, among others, the NFT will be hosting a seminar and public debate looking at the issues surrounding the digitisation of classic films.

There will be speakers from various areas of the film industry concerned with digitisation, from archivists to distributors. The panel will include Rob Hummel, Technical Director of Warner Bros., who has just completed the digital restoration of Gone With The Wind, which will be screening for two weeks at the NFT during December. Rob has worked on several acclaimed digital restorations and has just started work on The Wizard of Oz - it is possible he may bring a clip of this work in progress.

With the launch of the UK Film Council's Digital Screen Network, this is event is ideally timed and aims to help audiences understand the issues involved in the digitisation process and why it is happening. It will also be an ideal opportunity to compare various formats from 35mm through to HD cinema projection and to voice concerns and ideas directly to those involved in digitisation from restoration all the way through to exhibition.

This event will be followed by a special screening of the new digital restoration of Gone With The Wind, which will be preceded by a presentation from Rob Hummel who will put this restoration into a historical context and explain how the project evolved.

#2 of 73 MarcusUdeh

MarcusUdeh

    Supporting Actor

  • 785 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 23 2003

Posted November 12 2004 - 05:02 PM

Quote:
Rob has worked on several acclaimed digital restorations and has just started work on The Wizard of Oz
Yay...:b

*Too bad "The Wiz" isn't a Warner title*
[c][/c]

#3 of 73 Patrick McCart

Patrick McCart

    Lead Actor

  • 7,467 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001
  • Real Name:Patrick McCart
  • LocationAlpharetta, GA, USA

Posted November 12 2004 - 05:15 PM

I can't wait to see this. I thought the color jumps on the DVD were bad... but when I saw one of the dye-transfer '98 re-release prints, I was horrified by how bad the color registration was in some shots.

Even though the 1999 DVD is a great DVD, I can see Warner making another excellent release with Oz. It was rumored before that the SE DVD would end up being a 3-disc set... perhaps Warner could include the complete 1925 version, the complete 1933 cartoon, and even a few of the Baum-produced silent shorts. Of course, it would be neat if a certain Pink Floyd album could be an alternate audio track on the film.... Posted Image

#4 of 73 Rob Gardiner

Rob Gardiner

    Screenwriter

  • 2,950 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 15 2002

Posted November 12 2004 - 07:50 PM

Woot! This is great news!

Patrick,

If Warner Bros buys out EMI, then perhaps your wish will come true. Posted Image

#5 of 73 Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul

  • 39,595 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted November 13 2004 - 12:33 AM

This is sensational news!

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

gallery_269895_23_10043.jpg Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders gallery_269895_23_1316.jpg Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

gallery_269895_23_773.jpg Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive gallery_269895_23_992.jpgClick Here for our complete DVD review archive

gallery_269895_23_7246.jpg Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule gallery_269895_23_3120.jpg Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#6 of 73 Jonny_L

Jonny_L

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 158 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 06 2004

Posted November 13 2004 - 01:33 AM

This should prove very interesting. There are so many colours in the film that a restoration might make my video system explode Posted Image

I'm glad I never picked up the DVD. Hopefully it will be re-done in a new super duper collector's set or something.

After an ultra-resolution restoration WB has been creating 4k transfers havent they? I bet the movie would explode like a rainbow in Hi Def.
Jonathan
DVD Reviewer / News Editor
eyecravedvd.com

#7 of 73 Chip_HT

Chip_HT

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 222 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 28 2004
  • Real Name:Chip

Posted November 13 2004 - 02:47 AM

I've always hoped for a version of the film where they re-incorporate some of the cut footage back in. For instance, I'm sure that the Jitterbug could be reconstructed in some way using what footage they have plus today's technology. And also, some of the extended stuff they showed at the end of the 50th anniversary VHS.

#8 of 73 EricSchulz

EricSchulz

    Producer

  • 4,475 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2004

Posted November 13 2004 - 03:02 AM

I'm sure that the Jitterbug could be reconstructed in some way using what footage they have plus today's technology


The extended Scarecrow scene could be put back in, I believe, but I am pretty sure that the Jitterbug sequence is only available on a REALLY average quality 8mm home movie. Whether it ends up a one-disc movie treatment (doubtful) or a three disc Special Edition, I am so there!!!

#9 of 73 Daniel`D

Daniel`D

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 172 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 08 2003

Posted November 13 2004 - 05:09 AM

I just made a list of all my old VHS tapes that I needed to try to find on DVD and this one was one of them, I might hold off getting for awhile now though.

Thanks for this great news.
Image converted to link by moderator. Please consult the signature rules for limits on image size

http://img.photobuck...nde/sincity.jpg
My DVD Collection

#10 of 73 ScottR

ScottR

    Screenwriter

  • 2,650 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 01 2000

Posted November 13 2004 - 06:09 AM

If WB is reading this:

Please incorporate the stencil printing process in the switch to Technicolor that you used in the previous release.

Thanks!

#11 of 73 Andrew Budgell

Andrew Budgell

    Screenwriter

  • 1,195 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2002

Posted November 13 2004 - 12:31 PM

Please incorporate the stencil printing process in the switch to Technicolor that you used in the previous release.


Can you expand on this a bit, Scott? I'm not really sure what you're talking about!

Andy

#12 of 73 Steve...O

Steve...O

    Producer

  • 3,245 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 2003
  • Real Name:Steve

Posted November 13 2004 - 12:52 PM

Thank you Andrew for bringing this news! Thanks also to Warners for funding this project.

Steve
Please help UCLA restore the Laurel & Hardy films: https://www.cinema.u...aurel-and-hardy

#13 of 73 Patrick McCart

Patrick McCart

    Lead Actor

  • 7,467 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001
  • Real Name:Patrick McCart
  • LocationAlpharetta, GA, USA

Posted November 13 2004 - 01:03 PM

The stencil color...

ONLY seen in the master prepared by WB for the 1999 special edition DVD (It's NOT like this in the '98 digitally restored theatrical prints).

Basically, this is the shot where Dorothy first opens the door to Munchkinland. In the uncorrected version, it's obvious that the inside is simply lit and painted to look like it's in sepia tone. In the DVD, they digitally "desaturated" the entire inside of the house (as well as Dorothy, until she emerges in the Technicolor surroundings). It's striking and makes the transition even more stunning than it is without the desaturation.

It looks a little too "digital" in the '99 DVD, but WHV should be able to make it totally seamless with the real sepia tone footage prior to that shot with the current technology. Can you believe the old DVD is already 5 years old?

#14 of 73 Kyle McKnight

Kyle McKnight

    Screenwriter

  • 2,515 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 08 2001

Posted November 13 2004 - 01:38 PM

I don't own this movie yet, but will be buying this version! I haven't watched this movie in such a long time...
Kyle McKnight

#15 of 73 Andrew Budgell

Andrew Budgell

    Screenwriter

  • 1,195 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2002

Posted November 13 2004 - 02:08 PM

I have both the 50th Anniversary VHS, the 1991 re-issue VHS, the original DVD from the early days, and the Special Edition - Deluxe Box Set from 1999. This is my all time favourite (along with Gone With the Wind and Cleopatra) so this will be a no brainer for me. I have been very spoiled lately by Warner Bros. and just want to extend another thank you. Keep it up!

Andy

#16 of 73 Jay Pennington

Jay Pennington

    Screenwriter

  • 1,189 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 18 2003

Posted November 14 2004 - 06:11 AM

While the stencil process sounds cool, it would also be an example of modern tampering. On the original release, there was a reel change at the beginning of that shot from B&W stock (sepia or no) to color. I'd prefer the film as originally seen to be left alone in matters such as this.
-Jay

#17 of 73 Patrick McCart

Patrick McCart

    Lead Actor

  • 7,467 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001
  • Real Name:Patrick McCart
  • LocationAlpharetta, GA, USA

Posted November 14 2004 - 06:16 AM

Quote:
While the stencil process sounds cool, it would also be an example of modern tampering. On the original release, there was a reel change at the beginning of that shot from B&W stock (sepia or no) to color. I'd prefer the film as originally seen to be left alone in matters such as this.

But the original 1939 release featured this stencil printing. So, it's not being tampered with... the transition is just being created with modern tools, instead of photochemical processes.

It's like how the Photoplay Productions version of Phantom of the Opera (silent version) had some digital colorization to re-create color in shots. One scene had stencil color on a cape, another was in two-strip Technicolor, but survived only in B&W. So, it's just a matter of making the film look as close to the original release as possible.

#18 of 73 Paul_Scott

Paul_Scott

    Lead Actor

  • 6,546 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2002

Posted November 14 2004 - 06:25 AM

unlike the first GWTW dvd, TWOO disc still looks pretty good to me.
but i'll still be up for a new release, especially since it will most likely isolate the film on its own disc.

#19 of 73 ScottR

ScottR

    Screenwriter

  • 2,650 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 01 2000

Posted November 14 2004 - 07:36 AM

Yes, Patrick is correct....the stencil printing was utilized in the original release prints.

#20 of 73 Josh Simpson

Josh Simpson

    Supporting Actor

  • 926 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 23 2002

Posted November 14 2004 - 10:49 AM

Great news! Now I just have to decide whether to unload my WB disc or not.





Forum Nav Content I Follow