1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Spider-man 3 - On Going Developments

Discussion in 'Movies' started by oscar_merkx, Oct 11, 2004.

  1. oscar_merkx

    oscar_merkx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    7,632
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sam Raimi surprised a lot of press this weekend when he revealed that Columbia Pictures intends for "Spider-Man 3" to be the final film in the series. Seems, Sony's film head Amy Pascal has made it clear that she wants a definitive finale and so all the loose threads from the last two films must be tied up. So what does that mean story wise? Raimi spoke to LatinoReview about the possibilities and what that might mean for the Harry Osborn/Hobgoblin arc

    "I'm not sure what's in Harry's mind. I'm trying to figure that out right now. It's like if you blamed someone for the death of your father all these years and someone who was supposedly this hero, vigilante, and then you realized that your father was a mass murderer, it might change things...As much of a responsibility as I have to the fans of the comic books, I also have an equal responsibility to be true to the intelligence of the character as portrayed in the Spider-Man movies".

    Despite Pascal's intentions, Raimi seemed keen on working on further Spidey movies if he were allowed to but will concede to her wishes for now - "One thing that Amy Pascal told me was that she wants to make this a proper ending to the Spider-Man saga. I'd like to keep directing Spider-Man movies but I think she's thinking that the audience feels they want to see one more and no more. They want to have a proper ending to the story now. So I think maybe she's right, and so I'm approaching it under her guidance and that's how I'm trying to think of this film as the end".
    for more info http://www.latinoreview.com/intervie...onspidey3.html
     
  2. MatthewLouwrens

    MatthewLouwrens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    3,034
    Likes Received:
    1
    Interesting. And unfortunate. If they were able to maintain the quality, I think a Spiderman 4 would have been a good idea, and (based on my limited understanding of comic book history, entirely gained from a friend's reference book on Spiderman) that would have been the place for the Hobgoblin. I could accept Harry at the end of 2 would not become the Hobgoblin, but the knowledge he gained about his father would probably send him to a very dark place as he begins to question everything about his world. Once there, it would probably not take much to push him into instability, and then into Hobgoblin for a great final episode in a four-film series. That would work.

    But, if they are forcing it to end at 3, then they have to leave out the Hobgoblin, which would be a shame as that is where they had been leading up to.
     
  3. Jason Seaver

    Jason Seaver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    9,306
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd take this with a grain of salt. Spidey 3 isn't even scheduled to start filming until January 2006, which is something like thirty years away in film-development time, and I doubt that either Sony or Marvel will be particularly interested in not having Spider-movie money coming in. Whether the same cast and creative crew will still be involved is an open question, but I doubt that anyone is definitively ruling out Spider-Man 4.
     
  4. Ricardo C

    Ricardo C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    5,060
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps Sony feels making this a trilogy will cement the Spidey films' status as "new classics", instead of letting the series run on and on, slowly diluting itself. While I would gladly gobble up whatever amount of spidey films they throw at me, I have to admire this move. They'll probably close off the current story arc and revisit the Spidey universe sometime in the next decade.

    As for how to end things... Here's my suggestion: Do "The Death of Gwen Stacy" storyline, with MJ taking Gwen's role. I don't know if it'd be wise to end the trilogy on such a sad note, but it could make for a great, great film.
     
  5. JonZ

    JonZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 1998
    Messages:
    7,794
    Likes Received:
    7
    Theyre always changing their minds. 6 months ago they wanted 6 films.

    There will definitely be more than 3 Spidey films.
     
  6. Anthony Neilson

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Messages:
    1,021
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    London
    Real Name:
    Anthony
    If SPIDER-MAN 3 makes anything like the kind of money 2 did, anyone who thinks the series -in some form or another- will end there doesn't have much understanding of the movie business.
     
  7. Mark Maltais

    Mark Maltais Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ontario Canada
    Real Name:
    Mark
    Yeah right, these films do what 300 mil a piece total or something. There is NO WAY they will stop at three...as long as the sequels keep bringing in cash!
     
  8. Robert Ringwald

    Robert Ringwald Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,641
    Likes Received:
    0
    Overseas grosses put each film at nearly a billion.

    Sure she says that, but considering Columbia's past, I have a feeling that money is more important than being "noble"...by ending the series on a high note because.... duh... it's a movie company.
     
  9. Sean.S

    Sean.S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Spider-Man should go the Star Trek or Pokemon route and just become a fully-bonafide film franchise.
     
  10. Lynda-Marie

    Lynda-Marie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    0


    What you said, Anthony! The studio might or might not be able to talk the principals into returning after 3 [such as Tobey Maguire, Spidey himself] without a huge raise and/or a bigger share of the gross.

    BUT, if they handle it intelligently, not something Hollywood is particularly noted for, the movie franchise could go on for quite a while. If they have to go the James Bond route and re-cast the leads well, and intelligently, (still not a Hollywood trait) I think they could pull it off. Spider-man has not had this huge a cult following for this many years for it to suddenly fizzle out and disappear. The movies are almost a separate franchise in and of themselves, and as noted by posters above, a huge cash cow.

    If this lady succeeds with her plan to stop such a cash cow in its tracks, I don't see her having much of a future in the movie business. It might be another case of a business kicking itself forever for making a stupid move, such as M&M is still doing for not allowing its product to be placed in E.T. (Reece's Pieces, on the other hand, probably gave a huge bonus and/or promotion to the person who told Spielberg, "Why not?" especially considering how well the sales of Reece's Pieces took off after E.T.)
     
  11. Adam_ME

    Adam_ME Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    930
    Likes Received:
    1
    There will be a Spider-Man 4. Sure, they may wrap up all the loose ends in the third film, but they'll come up with something new for the fourth one. This is a billion dollar franchise for Sony. There's no way they just sit on it and do nothing.

    This is the same reason incidentally that I don't believe for a second that Revenge of the Sith will be the last Star Wars movie.
     
  12. Grant H

    Grant H Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,844
    Likes Received:
    0
    They could to a TV show instead like Star Wars is planning to do.
    Frankly, I think Spider-Man works better when handled in an episodic manner.
     
  13. Brian Kidd

    Brian Kidd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2000
    Messages:
    1,864
    Likes Received:
    177
    Grant, have you seen the live-action tv show from the '70s? *shudder*
     
  14. Chris Lockwood

    Chris Lockwood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 1999
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is a surprise? I never assumed the current team was doing more than 3, but certainly someday there will be a fourth, even if it is 10-20 years later.
     
  15. RyanAn

    RyanAn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    0
    "One thing that Amy Pascal told me was that she wants to make this a proper ending to the Spider-Man saga. I'd like to keep directing Spider-Man movies but I think she's thinking that the audience feels they want to see one more and no more. They want to have a proper ending to the story now. So I think maybe she's right, and so I'm approaching it under her guidance and that's how I'm trying to think of this film as the end."

    I like how she assumes she has my opinion. There are so many great villians that have not been used. I thought we were supposed to see Michael Clark Duncan as the Kingpin, Dr. Connors as the Alligator... I LOVE the first two films, and I could see this as a huge franchise.

    Ryan
     
  16. Scott Weinberg

    Scott Weinberg Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    7,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, forgive me if I don't take Ms. Pascal's words as anything but clever marketing. "Come see the LAST adventure of Spider-Man!" and all that. But let's look at the numbers.

    Spider-Man $820+ million worldwide

    Spider-Man 2 $775+ m

    So let's assume that Part 3 will gross at least $700m worldwide. The first exec who says "NO" to a SM4 will be the first one on the unemployment line.

    Superman 3 was supposed to be the final installment. Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter anyone? Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare?

    I do appreciate the idea of trilogies, and that the filmmakers want to adhere to the plot threads brought up in the earlier installments...but I don't buy the "three and done" info. At all.
     
  17. Tim Glover

    Tim Glover Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 1999
    Messages:
    7,982
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Monroe, LA
    Real Name:
    Tim Glover
    Good points Scott.
     
  18. Chris Farmer

    Chris Farmer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    1,495
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just as a quick toss-up, as far as I know Kingpin will never be in a Spider-man movie. It was part of the deal Fox made with Columbia/Tri-Star when Fox went along with Daredevil, that Kingpin would never appear in the other studio's franchise.
     
  19. Mikah Cerucco

    Mikah Cerucco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1998
    Messages:
    2,462
    Likes Received:
    0


    Those make an excellent case to leave Spider-Man at 3.
     
  20. Chip_HT

    Chip_HT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    5
    Real Name:
    Chip
    "I'd like to keep directing Spider-Man movies but I think she's thinking that the audience feels they want to see one more and no more."

    If that was the case with the comics, the franchise never would have lasted long enough to have a movie made.
     

Share This Page