Revenge is the only Tony Scott film I wasn't at least entertained by, but that has as much to do with the casting than anything else.
Raasean, Hollywood may indeed be on a comic book kick, but its a lot like their usual temporary infatuation with stuff like disaster flicks, Shakespeare in a modern setting, or Tarantino-esque pulp crime movies. Hey, at least Disney is breaking new remake ground by pioneering the Theme Park ride adaptation.
depends what counts as being "the same" to you; this story is about an emotionally stunted, hardcore special forces cum navy seals cum black ops operative who is hired to guard a girl during a spate of kidnappings; despite his best efforts and natural affective distance, he (perhaps not surprisingly) comes to love her. so, when she is finally kidnapped, he tries to find her, and kills everyone who gets in his way.
the same, but also not the same. i think this has all the earmarks of being a way better movie than a man apart. denzel's character (from what little the trailer shows) strikes me as far, far more interesting a character than that played by vin.
Having seen the original, I'd say John is right on target. A Man Apart is more of a 'Punisher' type story, where a man has nothing left to lose and is just after vengence.
Man on Fire really caught me as being special because it had the main character personally attached to the abducted girl. And it wasn't as easy a setup as a movie like Ranson, where the hero as a parent is naturally attached, leading to some nice character development learning to open up to the young girl.
I even like the last picture in JB's review. And regarding the thespians of choice, he is dead right that Denzel is head and shoulders above his competition (though I do feel Uma did a great job towards the end of KBv2). It makes all the difference in the world.
Seeing it tomorrow, and pretty excited. Good crew, good cast, good idea.
well, i have to say, that was a thoughtful, even-handed, review. what's more, it was a review of the movie rather than of his reaction to it. which is a refreshing change of pace for me. most so-called "critics" make me sick.
is creasy a superman in this, or does it take a more realistic tone. I always lose a little interest when the hero is so blatently indestructable. Or when the bad guys are inexplainable stupid, or uncharacteristically inept.
Is this a discussion thread? 'Cuz I'd like to tell Chuck I think seeing the "masterpiece" speech in the trailer hurt the scene for you. I found it to be perfect.
In fact, if it wasn't for Scott's most overdone "stylization" I've ever seen (that's saying a LOT) in his career - I thought this was BY FAR the best film of the year so far. Even better than Vol. 2, and I loved Vol. 2.
Unfortunately, Patrick's reaction won't be rare. The Scott "touch" IS quite annoying in this film and even had my head hurting. It's going to pull a lot of people out of a film that is perfectly written and stunningly performed.
Yes, he is far from a Superman in this film. In fact, they manage to include a fair amount of recuperation that I found quite believable.
As for me, I've somehow got to figure out how to compare this to Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind when working on my top 10 at the end of the year. I'm certain they will both be high on the list, if not at the top.
This thread is now designated the Official Discussion Thread for "Man on Fire" please, post all comments, links to outside reviews, film and box office discussion items to this thread.
All HTF member film reviews of "Man on Fire" should be posted to the Official Review Thread.