1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Harman Kardon AVR 520 review

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by JoeMac, Nov 26, 2001.

  1. JoeMac

    JoeMac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi All, long time lurker, first time posting...and what better way to start off brand new than with something brand new!
    I received my 520 on Friday, the 9th, and was one of the first people in the country to have one thanks to Jason at OneCall. Thanks again Jason!
    I spent most of last weekend setting it up and trying different things. The amount of flexibility you have is amazing, especially in the area of channel setup for different functions. This past week found me fine tuning and trying different sources.
    I am using this with Klipsch KLF-20 fronts, a KLF-C7 center, LF-10 subwoofer, and Klipsch surrounds.
    2 major initial impressions:
    1) QUIET ! pay attention, no what I mean is this unit is QUIET ! No matter what the source selected, no matter how loud I turn it up, as long as the media itself doesn't have noise you won't hear any. This is a night and day difference from the Marantz SR7200 that I just returned a few days before I got this. Yes, I had all the problems with the Marantz that everyone else is having, with the exception of the S-video noise.
    2) LOW END ! The LFE channel is noticeably better. I'm not sure if it's the bass management or just the crossover frequency, or something else. I have tried it both ways, with the fronts set to both large and small, and there is a greater feeling of impact then I've ever had before. You can select freqs of 100, 80, 60, or 40. When I balanced the system using Avia and the ratshack SPL meter, I didn't have to change the gain of the sub much at all. It was only about 2 db different than the Marantz. I set the fronts to small with a xover of 100, to try and duplicate the Marantz. I then played some of my 'reference DVD's', with the scenes I prefer for rattling the room. It is fantastic, I don't know how or why, but it's great.
    This receiver will play extremely loud without breathing hard. It helps that the Klipsch speakers are so efficient, but I have not noticed any distortion problems whatsoever. When I played this loud with my old Onkyo 575 and the SR7200, I could tell they were straining, and with the Marantz it actually started to hurt! I played the bonus track on the Eagles 'Hell Freezes Over' DVD, 'Seven Bridges Road', which has a different voice coming out of each speaker. When played loud I feel it pushes all the amps simultaneously. With the 520 there was a quality of effortlessness (that a word?) that dared me to turn it up louder. On the SR7200 it was more like, Okay, this really is starting to hurt my ears. The feeling was somewhat similar on the Onkyo but that was only rated at 70 watts per channel. Wait, the 520 is only rated at 75 ! I still can't believe the Marantz was spec'd at 105 watts. How about the quality of sound? Well, the Marantz was a definite improvement over the Onkyo, even though it was noisier. The HK is at least as good at low levels, with a better sense of spaciousness and localization (soundstage?). At louder volumes there is no comparison, the HK sounds more 'live' than the Marantz.
    I'm sure I'll never use all the surround modes, but Logic 7 is a better implementation that Prologic II. The remote I think I like so far. It's easy to program, is backlit, and the EZ-Set function really works! I originally used the SPL meter and noted the level settings, than tried it using the remmote. Pretty cool! It was within 1 db of my manual levels. I even used this method to set many of the different modes that I didn't consider critical. You can set the speaker size and levels not only for the different sources, but for different surround modes using the same source! Again, amazing flexibility.
    I haven't tried the MP3 or HDCD decoding yet. I have tried the 7.1 input. I have a JVC SA75 with DVD-audio and it is the best music I have ever heard. I wish I had a separate quality 5 channel amp to compare it with. I feel the amp section of the HK is more than I'll need for a long time.
    Well, that's all I can think of for now. Overall I think it's the start of a new love affair. I'll try to answer any questions you might have. [​IMG]
    (...previously posted at Home Theater Spot)
     
  2. Jerome Grate

    Jerome Grate Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 1999
    Messages:
    2,937
    Likes Received:
    1
    Great review, one question, does Logic 7 work with 5.1 material DVD, Satellite or DVD-Audio?
     
  3. JoeMac

    JoeMac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Logic 7 wil work with any surround encoded or conventional stereo material. There are 3 modes:

    Cinema - for sources already surround encoded

    Music - for normal stereo

    Enhanced - primarily music with greater bass enhancement to all speakers for a less localized soundstage.

    Logic 7 will not work with DVD audio because it will not affect the 5.1 discrete inputs.
     
  4. Lewis Besze

    Lewis Besze Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 1999
    Messages:
    3,134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey Joe,

    Nice review,I'm glad you like this piece,I've been waiting for some type of review on this unit.

    Is this a 5 or 6/7 channel receiver[built in amps]?
     
  5. Einar

    Einar Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 1999
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    iv been looking at this unit for some time now, but the reps on "quality control" kept me waiting.
    i currently have a 474 onkyo, and i think the amp section sux.
    i have also tryed the 575 and it sounded more powerfull and wide.
    but still thats not enough...will the hk be enough for me u think?
    how is it with classical? i hear thats its bad side..
    strangly the new 595 beat the hk in a magazine here, and with 200 bucks off.
    while the other norwegian magazine the hk crushed the onkyo, who too trust? too many choices out there.
    some i also consider, is the denon avr3802, but its more expensive.
    [​IMG]
     
  6. JoeMac

    JoeMac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lewis: It is a 5 channel only. I'm willing to bet it is the exact same amp section as the 510. It is rated 5 watts higher, but I believe they went with that only because the 510 was so underrated.

    Einar: I had a 575 before I bought the Marantz SR7200, which subsequently went back. There is no comparison between the AVR 520 and the Onkyo. Don't let the similarity of the power rating fool you. This H/K shines with any kind of music I've thrown at it so far. The soundstage I get with any kind of orchestral piece is amazing! (provided it was recorded and mixed with some degree of care).

    Again, the type of source you give it has a lot to do with the results. My DVD-Audio collection is up to 5 and growing! The only one I'm dissatisfied with so far is Joni Mitchell.
     
  7. Jeff Savage

    Jeff Savage Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2001
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    JoeMac -

    I have had the HK 510 (the only difference being the surround modes and 5 Watts more power) for some time now and I agree with all of your statements. I am also using it with Klipsch speakers (Cornwall mains and Heresy surrounds and center). Simply an awesome piece of equipment. The HDCD and MP3 decoding work as advertised. I am surprised that it does not get mentioned more.

    Laters,
     
  8. Bryan Acevedo

    Bryan Acevedo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    How does the volume control work? I remember on some of their older models (beginning of this year) that they had problems with them. They would turn up the volume if you turned it down too fast, and vice versa. That was a real turn off for me. I have heard the sound quality is great, and would give these a look in the future when I decide to upgrade my 3802 some day (way in the future).

    Bryan
     
  9. Ben Yang

    Ben Yang Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2001
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ditto on my experience with the HK 510. Amazingly clear and smooth. Listened to a Denon 3802 yesterday and still feel the HK is cleaner and more transparent. Logic 7 is a bonus but haven't had the chance to compare with PL2.

    The front panel interface is excellent and provides a lot of info. Classy looks. The denon is a great product and perhaps better QC, but I don't need the bells and whistles, and prefer the $ going to quality sound / amp.

    Fortunately, I've been spared the QC issues of prior HK's. After ~1 year, so far so good. Now, if I could sell my 510 on Ebay and upgrade to the 520...

    My 2 cents.

    Ben
     
  10. Rob Robinson

    Rob Robinson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2001
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    0
    i've got a 110 as my starter HT reciever- when i upgrade my speakers, I'm prolly going ot go with the 520 as well. I've been super impressed with the clean sound as well as the clean looks.
     
  11. Dan_C

    Dan_C Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm another satisfied AVR 520 owner. I'm also updating my speakers to PSB 6Ts and the 9C center as well as the HSU VTF-2 subwoofer.

    WOW! The sound brought tears to my eyes. For 75W per channel the receiver kicks. Playing Phantom Menace literally (I mean it!) blew pieces of foam off the woofers from my older 150W 10" towers.

    I'm giddy just thinking what the system will sound like when my 6Ts and the VTF-2 arrive. I couldn't be happier. H/K has hit a homerun. Again.

    I'm waiting to test the MP3 capability with the new H/K USB to coaxial digital adaptor that will be available in December (according to the H/K website). I've seen the specs on OneCall's website as well.

    In my opinion you can't go wrong with this receiver (unless you have complaining neighbors!).
     
  12. DavidAM

    DavidAM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2001
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    0
    You guys are really amping me up for my 520!!! I ordered it from JandR.com yesterday so I'm hoping I get it before the weekend. I'm currently using an 11 year old Pioneer Dolby Surround reciever. Will the sound really come to life and be that much different or am I just buying into the hype? I did demo the reciever but nothing was hooked up right and I could only hear them out of these crappy little speakers so all the recievers sounded like shit. I'm anxiously awaiting my 520 to see how much of a difference a new high quality reciever makes!
     
  13. JoeMac

    JoeMac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey Jeff Savage

    How the heck are you using a Heresy as a center channel!

    I'll bet those Cornwalls sound sweet with the H/K high current amp section. My friend brought over his Parasound 855 amp, which is a pretty good home theater amp from what I've read. I could not tell the difference between the H/K and the Parasound (using the 520 as a front end for the Parasound). My friend was impressed too, although he says his amp makes the Klipsches a little smoother.

    Cornwalls, someday I'll find a decent pair and snap those babies up. Belle Klipsch or La Scala's would be nice too! Do you have the originals or the two's? Modified?

    Anyway, to get back to the AVR 520 and stop dreaming...

    I think the H/K has overcome the quality problems that started with the 500 series. I'm not sure when they made the move to Chinese manufacturing, but the 510 series was much better, except for the control noise problems and the remote. After almost non-stop use of mine for 3 weeks I don't have a complaint yet! Here's hoping the 520 lasts for awhile!
     
  14. lester

    lester Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 1999
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow thanks for the review. I was all setup to get the Denon 3802, but now my decision has been made to get the 520. For you guys that have one which amp are you running for the two rear channels?

    Thanks again,

    Les
     
  15. Mal P

    Mal P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2000
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the review!
    I've just finished reading the owners manual, and it seems on this receiver, you can't set your front speakers as small and use the lower cross-over frequencies (40hz, 60hz)? This is a damn shame, as this means if I want to off-load the deep bass from the fronts, I can only use the 80hz or higher cross-over.
    I hope I'm mistaken here... could someone please prove me wrong? [​IMG]
    Thanks,
    Mal
     
  16. JoeMac

    JoeMac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mal, you are not mistaken. When the mains are set as small you are limited to using 80 or 100 Hz. When large you pick between 40 or 60 Hz. This should cover most circumstances. I'm not really sure what you wish to accomplish.
     
  17. Jeff Savage

    Jeff Savage Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2001
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    JoeMac -
     
  18. Mal P

    Mal P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2000
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Joe,

    My fronts can handle down to 35hz at -2dB or so, and I would have liked to use either the 40hz or 60hz cross-over with them, to offload the deep bass into the subwoofer. I personally feel that the 80hz mark is a little too high.

    Sincerely,

    Mal
     
  19. Richard Burzynski

    Richard Burzynski Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joe:

    Just to clarify the L7 feature, and if I'm not mistaken, I believe that L7 can only be engaged when using a 2 channel analog connection. Correct?

    Thanks.

    Rich B.
     
  20. JoeMac

    JoeMac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mal:

     

Share This Page