At the quick "correction" (I guess I can call it that?) from green to blue, it's as though you can see someone thinking "oops" and turning the knob the rest of the way to get it right.
Yellow + blue = green works for subtractive colour (inks and dyes). Light is additive. So wouldn't one expect red and blue to be magenta.Could it be that the green is a result of an overlap of the yellow and blue (in the same place the black is appearing in the faulty version? confused.gif
Unless things change at MGM, it may not occur.Originally Posted by egbert1234 /t/315747/a-few-words-about-west-side-story-in-blu-ray/90#post_3865518
Thank you for the warning Mr. Harris but when can we expect your film restoration on blu-ray of " The Alamo"?
I believe in a commentary or an interview, Robert Wise commented on the difficulty of doing this aerial shot since the cameras -- at the time -- didn't have gyroscopes. This had all changed by the time he began to film the aerial shots for the Sound of Music. I'll have to track that down.Robert Harris said:A note regarding the discussion of what some are describing as "judder" in the opening aerial shots. I've spoken with someone who has projected the film numerous times in 70mm and a bit of helicopter "bounce," as he describes it in inherent in the original. I'm not certain if there may be some other minor problem, but regardless, this is still nothing of great concern.
RAH
I hate to quibble, but I must because it drives me nuts every time somebody says yellow and blue = green (sorry in advance!)Originally Posted by Mike Frezon /t/315747/a-few-words-about-west-side-story-in-blu-ray/90#post_3865407
Hmmmmm.
Could it be that the green is a result of an overlap of the yellow and blue (in the same place the black is appearing in the faulty version?
I learned all about this color stuff when I was very young!
Yes, but yellow (red + green) and blue would be white (red + blue + green) in an additive system.CMNash said:Yellow + blue = green works for subtractive colour (inks and dyes). Light is additive. So wouldn't one expect red and blue to be magenta.
Oh, no problem Will.Originally Posted by Will Krupp /t/315747/a-few-words-about-west-side-story-in-blu-ray/90#post_3865801
I hate to quibble, but I must because it drives me nuts every time somebody says yellow and blue = green (sorry in advance!)
I don't see this on the HDnet version -- are you referring to the entire arial sequence, or just particular shots? And if it's just particular shots, which ones?haineshisway said:Just to be clear with what I'm seeing in the aerial shots - it's not what people are calling "judder" - and it's not the airplane bouncing or not being stable. It's "shimmering" or what some here call "moire" - where buildings take on a life of their own - maybe it's not noticeable to some, but I sure noticed it all throughout that sequence - someone said it had something to do with the downconversion to 1080p but I don't know enough about that to know - all I know is it's there and it really should not have been doing it. I totally understand airplane movement and that stuff, but this is not that, at least to my eyes.
The color transitions as seen in the various video incarnations are irrelevant. The only hero is a 1961 dye transfer print.Originally Posted by Marc Martin /t/315747/a-few-words-about-west-side-story-in-blu-ray/90#post_3865837
I don't see this on the HDnet version -- are you referring to the entire arial sequence, or just particular shots? And if it's just particular shots, which ones?
Anyway, I've just ordered the UK Blu-ray, so I'll see if the Bluray is different from what I've been watching for years. Also ordered a bargain-basement laserdisc to get another datapoint on how that red-to-blue transition should really look...