Welcome to my first official HTF Hardware Review, BenQ's W500, a 3LCD 720P HD Projector. This thread is a working review in progress as I kick the tires and see what I like and dont like about this unit, especially as it compares to my current PJ, the Panasonic AE-900u, which coincidentally is ALSO a 3LCD 720p HD Projector.
First, you can find the running Flickr Stream for this review here:
08-BenQ-W500 Reveiw - a set on Flickr
The embedded images I'm putting in from Flickr are getting cached and resized by HTF, so not sure how to turn that off. I will put direct links below some of them so you can see the originals.
You should note a few things about those photos. First, I am a double color blind person, which means Reds/Greens and Blues/browns tend to merge together. So if the colors seem a bit 'off', its probably my eye rather than the PJ. Second, please dont mind the dust =p Yes I know I should dust my PJ more and clean the fans a bit =)
More as I get it typed up, but my initial impressions are as follows:
- The chassis is significantly similar to my AE900U. In fact, its the closest I've seen to that model not made by Panasonic.
- The image it throws, out of the box direct, is a heck of a lot sharper and more contrasty. If those were the ONLY considerations I had, I'd immediately want to upgrade, but there are a lot more factors than IQ that come into play.
- There is some screen dooring if you get in close to it, but at normal viewing distances you never see them at all. I like to play videogames in close on my screen so I prefer the 'smoothscreening' of the Pannys, but the Panny loses sharpness to get that effect. Smoothscreening also seems to reduce Edge Enhancement and EE shows more vividly on the W-500. Garbage in Garbage out or so they say!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3133/...76fc88bc_b.jpg
- MOST IMPORTANTLY, I failed to follow rule #1 when buying a PJ when signing up for this one to review: Make DAMN sure that the zoom range of the PJ is within range of where you intend to place the PJ. If you see this picture, you will see that at the distance my existing setup is set up at, the minimum screen real estate needed is waaaaay too big for my screen and even for my wall. I have had to temporarily set up this PJ on box tops in the middle of my room. What this means is that even if I loved this PJ more than anything, there is no way I could make it permanently work in my room, so measure carefully and make sure it fits in with YOURs if you plan on putting one in yourself! The zoom range on this PJ is probably the biggest dissappointment, the 900U's range smokes that of this unit.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3179/...62b1793d_b.jpg
To make absolutely sure this doesnt happen to you, use BenQ's PJ calculator or one of the many available on the web:
http://www.benq.com/product/projector/calculator/
First, you can find the running Flickr Stream for this review here:
08-BenQ-W500 Reveiw - a set on Flickr
The embedded images I'm putting in from Flickr are getting cached and resized by HTF, so not sure how to turn that off. I will put direct links below some of them so you can see the originals.
You should note a few things about those photos. First, I am a double color blind person, which means Reds/Greens and Blues/browns tend to merge together. So if the colors seem a bit 'off', its probably my eye rather than the PJ. Second, please dont mind the dust =p Yes I know I should dust my PJ more and clean the fans a bit =)
More as I get it typed up, but my initial impressions are as follows:
- The chassis is significantly similar to my AE900U. In fact, its the closest I've seen to that model not made by Panasonic.
- The image it throws, out of the box direct, is a heck of a lot sharper and more contrasty. If those were the ONLY considerations I had, I'd immediately want to upgrade, but there are a lot more factors than IQ that come into play.
- There is some screen dooring if you get in close to it, but at normal viewing distances you never see them at all. I like to play videogames in close on my screen so I prefer the 'smoothscreening' of the Pannys, but the Panny loses sharpness to get that effect. Smoothscreening also seems to reduce Edge Enhancement and EE shows more vividly on the W-500. Garbage in Garbage out or so they say!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3133/...76fc88bc_b.jpg
- MOST IMPORTANTLY, I failed to follow rule #1 when buying a PJ when signing up for this one to review: Make DAMN sure that the zoom range of the PJ is within range of where you intend to place the PJ. If you see this picture, you will see that at the distance my existing setup is set up at, the minimum screen real estate needed is waaaaay too big for my screen and even for my wall. I have had to temporarily set up this PJ on box tops in the middle of my room. What this means is that even if I loved this PJ more than anything, there is no way I could make it permanently work in my room, so measure carefully and make sure it fits in with YOURs if you plan on putting one in yourself! The zoom range on this PJ is probably the biggest dissappointment, the 900U's range smokes that of this unit.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3179/...62b1793d_b.jpg
To make absolutely sure this doesnt happen to you, use BenQ's PJ calculator or one of the many available on the web:
http://www.benq.com/product/projector/calculator/