World War Z

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Richard V, Mar 27, 2013.

  1. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,513
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    I enjoyed it far more than I expected. Did a double feature with bling ring. My quick review would be fairly positive b+
     
  2. Todd H

    Todd H Go Dawgs!

    Joined:
    May 27, 1999
    Messages:
    2,153
    Likes Received:
    58
    Location:
    Georgia
    Real Name:
    Todd
    There were some cool sequences, but overall I thought it was merely ok. A fairly forgettable flick IMO.
     
    Scott McGillivray likes this.
  3. Quentin

    Quentin Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,670
    Likes Received:
    101
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Quentin H
    I didn't expect to like it at all, so a C+ grade is better than I thought I'd give it. But, it's a pretty capable film. I don't want to see it again...I won't get it on blu ray...but, I had some fun watching it.

    I do think the Zombies moved WAY too fast. But, it's really more of a contagion thriller than a zombie movie.
     
  4. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,513
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    Forgettable is the right word, still fun. B-
     
  5. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,419
    Likes Received:
    179
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    ** (out of 4)

    All that money spent and they couldn't come up with a story? It's basically Brad Pitt filling in for James A. Fitzpatrick and doing a TravelTalks episode. The zombies here were some of the laziest looking I've seen in a while and they certainly weren't scary. In between Pitt going into various locations, we also get that scene where he must walk somewhere not knowing if a zombie is about to jump out. These scenes were so poorly directed that there was never a single second where I tensed up or was worried. And since the world was at risk, did anyone actually feel this? Even Romero used his mini-budget to give the viewer the feel that something bad was happened and something that could destroy the world as we know it. Not once did I get that feel watching this thing.

    I don't know what was wrong with the original 1/3 of the picture but it must have been awful if this finale was considered better. That final dumb speech reminded me of one Steven Seagal gave years earlier towards the end of the picture.

    I don't mind a PG-13 horror/action movie as long as you can build tension. Without the tension you're left with a little kids movie and that's exactly what this felt like. Most of the death scenes take place off camera and I just kept waiting for Bugs Bunny to show up and offer someone a carrot.
     
  6. Tino

    Tino Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    8,195
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Metro NYC
    Real Name:
    Valentino
    I actually thought the zombies were terrifically realized and very scary. The clicking teeth and they way they moved,ran and swarmed over their victims.
     
  7. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,453
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    I didn't mind it and it wasn't half as bad as the movie sites were saying/hoping it would be. I think people who are into zombies will dig this movie but "forgettable" is an applicable description.

    I'm kinda bummed that there was basically no gore. I realize that the movie was tremendously expensive and had to be PG-13 and you don't need a bloodbath to make a good movie but you could play this movie with no edits on network television. I mean there's way more gore in an episode of CSI than this. It's a zombie movie, have some blood! :)
     
  8. Tino

    Tino Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    8,195
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Metro NYC
    Real Name:
    Valentino
    I wonder what an R rated version would have been like. World War Z made an estimated $25 million yesterday on its way to about $65 million this weekend , above projections.
     
  9. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,453
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    I can't understand why they expected it to open low. I guess it's because the media was trumpeting its troubled production but even my armchair quarterback ass could tell them that no normal people know or care about that. Zombies are very popular with "the kids today" and Brad Pitt is one of the biggest stars in the world so when you have a movie with Pitt fighting zombies, you're going to get people into theaters on the opening weekend.
     
  10. Tino

    Tino Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    8,195
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Metro NYC
    Real Name:
    Valentino
    I agree Travis.
     
  11. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,513
    Likes Received:
    385
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    The reasons why expectation was low were tons of reshoot a and a budget that went over $220m. The only film near it with a budget that high is 'The Lone Ranger'.
     
  12. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,453
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    I understand that but most regular audience members don't know or care about the business side of movies (ignorance must truly be bliss). The movie could be the biggest piece of crap of all time but if it's got Brad Pitt fighting zombies, it's still going to have a big opening weekend. The second weekend might be a disaster but the first is golden.
     
  13. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    29,310
    Likes Received:
    4,679
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Saw it today and loved it and I'm not into the whole zombie craze.
     
    Tim Glover likes this.
  14. Lou Sytsma

    Lou Sytsma Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 1998
    Messages:
    5,820
    Likes Received:
    317
    Real Name:
    Lou Sytsma
    World War Z could have be way more gory but its restrained approach worked well. Fun popcorn flick with a strong third act.
     
    Tim Glover likes this.
  15. Rhett_Y

    Rhett_Y Screenwriter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2001
    Messages:
    1,265
    Likes Received:
    2
    I actually really liked this one. It was fun, it kept me interested from the start. I actually like how he jumped around from place to place. I do wish they would have shown more of the gore though, but then again that really isn't what this movie is about. I can see them releasinga DVD/BRD that is uncut and shows a little more blood and what have you. Either way I really liked this movie.

    I really liked the way "they" moved, climbed and had absolutly no issues with jumping off buildings etc. Loved that!!!

    I give it a solid "B".
     
  16. Tino

    Tino Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    8,195
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Metro NYC
    Real Name:
    Valentino
    From deadlinehollywood:
     
  17. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,419
    Likes Received:
    179
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    If the budget of this was way over $250 million then I'm not sure why the studios are so happy with $65. I'm going to guess that it drops at least 50% next weekend so it appears it's still going to be a very big money loser (and especially if you go by the logic where Warner said they lost money on Harry Potter).
     
  18. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    26,453
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    ^ Keep in mind that Brad Pitt is huge international money as well.
     
  19. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,419
    Likes Received:
    179
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    No doubt. I'm the type that believes very few movies actually "lose money" but if studios are going to claim that stuff like Harry Potter can't make a profit then the $65 million for this thing and its budget really doesn't seem all that good.
     
  20. Tim Glover

    Tim Glover Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 1999
    Messages:
    7,994
    Likes Received:
    260
    Location:
    Monroe, LA
    Real Name:
    Tim Glover
    I loved it as well. Like Robert said, not a big-time Zombie fan but this film really worked for me. I think part of why it did was because it dialed way down the gore. Cast was very good. Was intense & I was captivated. Well done.
     
    Robert Crawford likes this.

Share This Page