Carl Miller
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2002
- Messages
- 1,461
Quote:
Exactly. It's deceitful by relying on the fact that people don't always read things properly, either due to haste, their own idiocy or perhaps because english isn't their first language.
From personal experience, I just had a winning bidder back out of an auction of mine this week.
He bought a 2nd print Grateful Dead poster from me, circa 1968. My listing clearly stated in 4 seperate places including the header that the poster was a 2nd print. You know what the winning bidder communicated to me in his e-mail backing out of the auction?
He said my listing was "vague and misleading" and he thought he was bidding on a 1st print of the poster. The truth is more likely that he got carried away and bid about $150 over book value for the piece and probably figured that out after the auction ended.
I don't know how I could have been more clear any more than I can figure how this particular seller could have been more clear that the item was just the box...Looks perfectly clear to me.
The end result of my auction by the way is that I gave the buyer a negative, and got one in return. I can live with that as I have a good, well earned reputation...However if everybody followed your line of thinking here, I'd be out of business.
It's the buyers responsibility to read and comprehend the listing.
Exactly. It's deceitful by relying on the fact that people don't always read things properly, either due to haste, their own idiocy or perhaps because english isn't their first language.
From personal experience, I just had a winning bidder back out of an auction of mine this week.
He bought a 2nd print Grateful Dead poster from me, circa 1968. My listing clearly stated in 4 seperate places including the header that the poster was a 2nd print. You know what the winning bidder communicated to me in his e-mail backing out of the auction?
He said my listing was "vague and misleading" and he thought he was bidding on a 1st print of the poster. The truth is more likely that he got carried away and bid about $150 over book value for the piece and probably figured that out after the auction ended.
I don't know how I could have been more clear any more than I can figure how this particular seller could have been more clear that the item was just the box...Looks perfectly clear to me.
The end result of my auction by the way is that I gave the buyer a negative, and got one in return. I can live with that as I have a good, well earned reputation...However if everybody followed your line of thinking here, I'd be out of business.
It's the buyers responsibility to read and comprehend the listing.