ShellOilJunior
Second Unit
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 253
This is a must. Although, the drum will still bang until all Beatles properties are on blu-ray.
Hi Douglas!Douglas_H said:No mono or stereo re-release. If you want to immerse yourself in the various one offs that Giles Martin will not be re-doing for this release check of the Steve Hoffman forum. Probably a 100 pages by now.
Not that anyone is but I would not hold your breath on LIB, ever.
IMO, Yoko and likely Paul will never agree to a release as there are some fairly low moments.
Anthology far more likely and may be in progress now. This release took a long time to finish and Anthology has a lot more content.
FWIW, I previewed some of the restored video in HD and even over the internet they looked killer.
Also looking forward to what Giles did with the older "stereo" mixes as they have uniformly been hideous and not really stereo.
Hi Douglas!Douglas_H said:The original Beatles 1 cd was not very well received and kind of rightfully so, imo.
The mid-60's Beatles releases on Capitol had reverb applied by Capitol personnel so if these LPs or CDs are your reference for Beatles output then you surely heard them this way originally
Frankly, I don't see how. The source is four track. If instruments are buried on one track of the four track, they're still going to be buried, even with digital manipulation. I'm not sure how I would feel about new mixes - it seems to me that the George Martin produced mixes - at least the mono ones up to and including Pepper and the stereo mixes after that - are canon. They didn't actually pay that much attention to the stereo mixes until the White Album because in '66, stereo wasn't really happening yet in the UK and I think they actually misread the U.S. market. There's a lot of fan stuff about wanting Steve Wilson to do mixes, but I dunno. The latest releases of anything usually wind up being the ones that get played on radio and streaming services and they would wind up replacing the originals. (I wonder how many of the fans calling for Steve Wilson or other alternate Beatles mixes are the same people who decry George Lucas for changing the OT.)Brian Kidd said:$60, though. Ouch. As a Beatles fan, I'll bite the bullet, of course, but it's going to really hurt. I really enjoyed the new mixes on the Yellow Submarine Songtrack (except for the weirdly out-of-sync Eleanor Rigby) so hopefully these new mixes will be similar. I know it's blasphemy, but I'd be interested in new mixes of all of their albums; not to supplant the original mixes, which were genius, but as an alternative. Modern audio technology can do so much more than the limited 4-track tape that was used on many of their albums. The Beatles and George Martin layered so much sound when creating the original songs that modern mixing really lets you clearly hear instruments and sounds that may have gotten buried in the original mixes. Like I said, I would never want the new mixes to replace the originals; I would just love to have them as an option.
All I've ever heard is that Paul McCartney won't permit Let It Be to be released in his lifetime because he's embarrassed over the fight he has with George Harrison in the film. I think it's silly because fans who grew up in that era already have seen the film and know about it.Sam Favate said:It seems like every few years there is a "confirmation" that Let It Be is coming. Most recently, I think it was in 2010 when the director said it was coming in 2013. Ringo also commented somewhere along the line that it was coming.
As for Anthology, no mention that I am aware of - ever - of it coming to blu-ray, beyond fans' asking for it. The show is 20 years old, and the DVDs are 15 years old.
At a time when artists like Dylan and Springsteen are putting out high quality archival releases on a regular basis, the Beatles should really step up their output.
bigshot said:It looks to me like all of the songs on the 1 disk are both video and stereo/5.1. It appears that most of the songs on the second disk are stereo/5.1 as well. I don't think there is an audio only option, but you can just turn off your TV
zoetmb said:Frankly, I don't see how. The source is four track.
I would hope on Blu-ray that we got more complete performances, which were on the CDs. Include the complete Shea Stadium show, things like that. Actually, I'd love to see them copy what Neil Young did with his Archive Blu-ray boxset, which hasn't been matched by any other artist. Include hi-res audio of the albums in Stereo and Mono, with the Anthology footage/promo vids that matches the period.zoetmb said:Would love to see both remasters of the Anthology CDs as well as a Blu-ray of the Anthology TV show, but if the TV footage was recorded on video, there's not much they're going to be able to do with it.
bigshot said:The Love album will give you an idea of what can be done with the earlier Beatles songs. It isn't going to sound much like the original mixes, but it will sound good.
One thing I noticed on the Love album is that they used a verse on one of the White Album songs that isn't on the record. I wonder if they'll be diving that deep into the alternate takes with the 1+ disks. The Love disk is something completely separate from the original releases. I hope this will be too. I'll be disappointed if they don't use the 5.1 to its fullest.
Dee Zee said:A few of these promos have unique mixes or versions such as Hello Goodbye which runs slower, and Hey Jude and Revolution that have live vocals mixed with prerecorded backing tracks.