What's new

Robert Harris on The Bits - 7/17/02 column - OFFICIAL THREAD (1 Viewer)

Bill Hunt

Insider
Joined
Dec 5, 1998
Messages
434
Robert Harris' regular column on The Digital Bits this week covers a lot of ground, from Vinegar Syndrome and film grain to digital restoration and aspect ratios.
Vinegar Syndrome is a Gas, Gas, Gas
So click on the link to read Robert's comments and come on back here to discuss the topic, provide feedback, ask a question of Robert and ruminate as you please.
Enjoy!
 

Patrick McCart

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 16, 2001
Messages
8,200
Location
Georgia (the state)
Real Name
Patrick McCart
Again, great article.

I recieved some old drive-in 35mm "headers" which were for trailers (Like "Coming soon" and "On Monday") and they're in poor condition.

The Eastmancolor bits are yellowed, brittle, and red. They also stink. I had to put them away since they smelled like rotten eggs. On the other hand, the B&W safety bits are in great shape. The film is still in great condition.

Oddly enough, also in the assorted nuts box were a 1 foot section of Aliens (torn by projector) and the reel 1 header for The Black Cauldron.

Is there any reason why the B&W safety film pieces would not be as yellowed and rotten as the Eastmancolor pieces?
 

Joseph Goodman

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 4, 2001
Messages
206
I remember my first encounter with VS... I was viewing a print at the Library of Congress, and it got progressively worse with each real. The first reel had merely a touch of vinegar, but by sixth (final) reel I was ready to pass out! That's to say nothing of having to "ride" the focus knob because of the film warpage, and it goes without saying that the film was beet red as well! At least it wasn't a truly rare title (just one not commercially available).
 

Adam_S

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2001
Messages
6,316
Real Name
Adam_S
Another outstanding article, I enjoyed it very much and learned a great deal as well.

a few questions

were any films ever shot in 70 mm? you mentioned 65 mm as the ratio that provides 2.21 flat and 2.76 anamorphic, but is 70 mm ever used for shooting, or is it just to double (or is it quadruple, an area thing?) prints of a regular 35 mm film for larger screens.

You mentioned How Green Was my valley (one of my favorites!) and it certainly has a beautiful restoration, but near the very end when Huw is pushing a cart in the mine noticible scratches and dirt appear, it's the only time I noticed any sort of damage in the film transfer and have always wondered if that was because a different generation was duped in at that point; if there was no negative or high quality elements for those few sections and they had to make do with what they could get? I agree completely with you on the treatment of best picture winners on dvd. I only wish the dvd of how Green was my Valley had gotten better special edition treatment, I would have loved a retrospective comparing the best picture winner to the other films of 1941 (one of the greatest years ever in film), a commentary by a film scholar, preferably with a John Ford bent. A feature comparing the styles of Arthur Miller and Gregg Toland working under John Ford would have been spectacular, a feature on the place of this film in the John Ford pantheon (his only best picture winner, yet one of four for which he recieved best director) and since this dvd was produced two or more years ago Roddie Mcdowell was available for features and commentary, but sadly nothing was made of this oppurtunity. Even if nothing this lavish were done, something along the lines of MGM's special edition of Some Like it Hot would have been much appreciated.

Something similarly peculair, but more dramatic than How Green Was my Valley, happens on disney's set of the Davy Crockett series, at some point in (I believe) the first episode, the film drops into sepia and the sound completely drops out, it is very puzzling and I was wondering if you could shed some light on this situation?

Thanks for your time and the wonderful articles

Adam
 

Werner_R

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 24, 2002
Messages
161
Another excellent article and again I learned a great deal, thank you Mr. Harris
How about a listing of your favorite films since you make some good suggestions for movie lovers ?
 

oscar_merkx

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
7,626
Mr Harris
Once again thank you for a wonderful job well done.
It is always great to read these article about film preservation and the titles of great movies that are mentioned, meaning that I have purchased already quite a few John Ford movies like She Wore a Yellow Ribbon and the Iron Horse. That means How Green was My Valley will be third dvd I will purchase.
Vinegar Syndrome is absolutely interesting to learn how this is affecting movie preservation. Thanks again for this article.
:D
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,428
Real Name
Robert Harris
Re: Adam S's comments...

I believe that some of the large format Russian productions may have been shot on 70mm stock, probably ORWO, but not certain.

70mm yields an image of approx. twice the width and 25% greater in height in its normal specs. Special event films can be 70/8 perf or sometimes 10, 12 or 15 perf, which is the IMAX format. IMAX runs horizontally like VistaVision.

How Green Was My Valley was a film in dire straights.

I believe the restoration was performed jointly by the Academy, UCLA Robert Gitt and Fox's Schwan Belston, with lab work provided by Triage. As I understand the facts, there is no original negative and only partial fine grain material, the rest being taken from release prints, hence the damage. Belston had Paul Rutan of Triage use Eastman separation stock 2238 for purposes other than meant to provide a preservation dupe which held the depth of the shadow detail available in the original.

I'm not certain that Roddy was still with us when the dvd was produced, but his loss certainly points up the need for a continued archive bank of artist interviews from all phases of the industry.

Your comments re: a comparison of cinematographic style within the films of John Ford could be used for almost any of the more prolific filmmakers. This would only really work if the film are owned by the same copyright holder as licensing can become hazardous to one's health and pocketbook. The wonderful documentary Visions of Light was able to be produced as it was done as an industry project. I believe its available fro Kino Home Video.

Re: Davy Crockett...

I believe the dvd goes to black and white (sepia) because the titles weren't shot on color stock. The productions were made for black and white television. The release looks amazing good on dvd as the original should be showing a deal of fade.

RAH
 

Patrick McCart

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 16, 2001
Messages
8,200
Location
Georgia (the state)
Real Name
Patrick McCart
Is vinegar syndrome always associated with yellowing of film?

I have some yellowed Eastman filmstrips which are yellowed and faded to red, but there isn't any noticable vinegar smell. Then again, I have some yellowed Eastman filmstrips which are not quite as red faded (have a tiny bit of color still left), but smell awful.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,428
Real Name
Robert Harris
VS has nothing to do with color fading, or whether a film is on black and white or color stock. Although it can exacerbate the fading problem.

RAH
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,241
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
The sepia sequences in the middle of the Davy Crocket episodes were due to lack of available color elements. I'm sure they were tinted sepia to make the transition from color to monochromatic less jarring than it would have been in greyscale.

As mentioned it was shot in color for B&W television. In addition, the five episodes were later edited into two color feature films. Apparently, the color negatives went missing for a few scenes from the TV series. Whether this had anything to do with the editing for the films, I don't really know. I'm pretty sure that none of the sepia scenes were part of the feature films, though.

Regards,
 

Peter Apruzzese

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 20, 1999
Messages
4,914
Real Name
Peter Apruzzese
Once again a great overview of the subject, RAH. Kudos to you (and Bill Hunt for publishing it).
 

Matt Stone

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2000
Messages
9,063
Real Name
Matt Stone
Thanks for the fantastic article, Robert.

Keep 'em coming...we appreciate them!
 

Darren Gross

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 16, 2001
Messages
518
Hi Robert.

An excellent edition of the new new column.

I had a couple of questions regarding some restoration work. In a past interview, you mentioned that you don't use any rejuvenation chemicals in your restoration projects. With that terrible chemical that helped erode THE ALAMO, I don't blame you. How do you feel about ultrasonic cleaning and wetgate printing as those also involve chemical contact with print and negative material?

Also, on the 1998 MY FAIR LADY commentary, you mentioned upcoming bogus restorations that would have gone against the late director's wishes. What were these?

What is going to make the ALAMO and MAD WORLD insoluble by mid next year- advanced vinegar syndrome or some other factor? While MGM doesn't seem willing to put up the $M required, might they put up enough to make preliminary duplicates and preservation material for the post problematic sections, thereby leaving out b & w protection masters, digital print work and fully timed answer prints to some later date?

Clearly, it's imperfect and would only be a stopgap measure, but it sounds like a gap that needs to be stopped. This would at least provide the option of further work down the line, should Texas investors or the studio climate change.

Best of luck, as always.

D
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,241
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
Also, on the 1998 MY FAIR LADY commentary, you mentioned upcoming bogus restorations that would have gone against the late director's wishes. What were these?
I think the most egregious example at the time was "The Wizard of Oz" where Warner was seriously considering including the Busby Berkeley extended Scarecrow Dance in the body of the film proper. Ultimately, cooler heads prevailed. Leonard Maltin was also one of the voices raised in protest at this idea. I'll bet a nickel that this was what Robert had in mind. Kudos to WB for coming to the right conclusion on that issue.

Regards,
 

Patrick McCart

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 16, 2001
Messages
8,200
Location
Georgia (the state)
Real Name
Patrick McCart
I think the most egregious example at the time was "The Wizard of Oz" where Warner was seriously considering including the Busby Berkeley extended Scarecrow Dance in the body of the film proper.
That being said, was Oz cut from the premire version to the existing version by the filmmakers or was it a studio-imposed "shortening?"

I liked the Scarecrow dance scene, but would it really mess up the flow terribly?
 

Peter Apruzzese

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 20, 1999
Messages
4,914
Real Name
Peter Apruzzese
As far as I know, it was cut before any public showing (other than maybe a sneak preview or two), so it was never part of any officially released version of the film. I believe the creators cut the scene because it was felt that it was an unnecessary bit of "slapstick". I agree with them.

I liked the Scarecrow dance scene, but would it really mess up the flow terribly?
Yes, it brings the film to a dead stop because it goes on way too long.
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,241
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
There were also pacing concerns due to the amount of screen time the Scarecrow got in his featured number versus the Tin Woodsman and the Cowardly Lion.

Regards,
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,428
Real Name
Robert Harris
I've realized after receiving a few emails that descriptions of what aspect ratios are doesn't really answer the question.

Therefore, to those who have contacted me, I'll make arrangement to scan and post on Bits -- it can be linked to HTF -- a proper aspect ratio chart as used by the optical houses.

After studying this chart, the concept of the difference between 1.66, 1.75, etc may make a bit more sense.

We're talking (in video language) just several lines of information difference between some ARs.

As things have been a bit busy, I have not been able to put together a column or update, but we'll get that chart posted for further discussion in the meantime.

With thanks to those who have brought this to my attention.

RAH
 

Gordon McMurphy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2002
Messages
3,530
"Talkin' Technicality Blues" ;)
Uh... our dear friend, Doug Trumbull initially used 70mm (technically ;)) for ShowScan. He needed really strong 65mm, but none was available back in... 198? so he had to acquire heavy duty 70mm and... trim off the 5mm using some doohicky to get his 65mm! ShowScan: 60fps, 65mm, 2.21:1. Superb camera system
The glorious first widescreen revolution (1928-1933?) included shooting on a 70mm negative. The Bat Whispers is on DVD in 2.13:1 - the true ratio of original 70mm. Not sure what the transfer is like though.
Thanks for reading.
Gordo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,070
Messages
5,130,056
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top