What's new

Fallout (Amazon Prime) (2 Viewers)

Adam Lenhardt

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2001
Messages
27,037
Location
Albany, NY
Yeah, I think the screwed that up.

It was implied it became a city with skyscrapers given the blast point and the surrounding buildings

They screwed that up. They couldn't have been pre-war buildings because Shady Sands was in the middle of nowhere, not created in an old metropolis. In 3 generations (Vault Dweller -> Vault Dweller grandchild) the difference between Shady Sands was size (one map -> 4 maps) and nothing exceeding a couple stories or build out of anything more than bricks and stone (and other low tech building materials).
The biggest discrepancy is the location, which has never been consistently portrayed. Fallout made it seem like it was in the middle of Death Valley. Fallout 2 showed it as being southwest of San Francisco, just on the other side of the Sierra Nevada. The show depicts it as being on the outskirts of Los Angeles's urban sprawl. My sense was that the skyscrapers in the distance were supposed to be pre-war skyscrapers from Los Angeles, while Shady Sands was more like a large town within visual range of Los Angeles.

The facts of Shady Sands's growth and fall tracked for me, given its status as the capital (at the time) of the New California Republic. Between Fallout (set primarily in 2161) and Fallout 2 (set primarily in 2241), Shady Sands went from being a small outpost housing a handful of extended families to the largest population center in the West, with 3,000 residents, and the New California Republic was the dominant power in the Southwest. According to the chalkboard in the Vault 4 classroom, Shady Sands got nuked in 2277, with the flashbacks we saw being shortly before and afterward. I can believe that roughly 28,000 people would be attracted to Shady Sands during those three and a half decades following Fallout 2, and that the hydroelectric power from the Hoover Dam would allow them to develop more infrastructure than most of the wasteland.
 

JimmyO

Berserker
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
1,063
Real Name
Jim
My apologies for the hit and run question, but I don't want to spoilerize myself by reading the thread.

How is Fallout? Are people enjoying it? I am shy about investing in a series if it sucks :) Any general opinions welcome! Thanks!
 

Walter Kittel

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 28, 1998
Messages
9,813
My apologies for the hit and run question, but I don't want to spoilerize myself by reading the thread.

How is Fallout? Are people enjoying it? I am shy about investing in a series if it sucks :) Any general opinions welcome! Thanks!

I absolutely recommend it. In terms of fidelity to the game environment upon which it is based I'd argue that it and The Last of Us are the very two best adaptations I've ever viewed. It has a very different tone vs. The Last of Us, but the tone and aesthetic of the series remarkably recreates the game environment. (I have played a LOT of Fallout over the years in multiple franchise titles.)

Even if you aren't a gamer, I would recommend the series. Production design is top tier. I am slowly working my way through season one (to make it last a while vs. binge watching) and it has been remarkably entertaining. It features some fairly extreme violence (which is sort of cartoon-ish, since it is based on a video game.) Not sure how you feel about that?

The acting has been solid, and the world building is very engaging. Repeating myself, definitely recommended.

- Walter.
 

John Sparks

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2001
Messages
4,574
Location
Menifee, CA
Real Name
John Sparks
The first episode really pulled you in but alas the second episode didn't. I gave it a shot and didn't read ONE review.
 

KeithDA

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
613
Location
Darlington, UK
Real Name
Keith
I finished the whole series last night and found it very entertaining. I have not seen the video game (or any other game for that matter), so I came at it completely new and it worked for me. I'm not sure how the story would have played out in a game, but the development here kept me guessing and wanting more.
Nicely set up for series 2...?
 

JimmyO

Berserker
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
1,063
Real Name
Jim
I absolutely recommend it. In terms of fidelity to the game environment upon which it is based I'd argue that it and The Last of Us are the very two best adaptations I've ever viewed. It has a very different tone vs. The Last of Us, but the tone and aesthetic of the series remarkably recreates the game environment. (I have played a LOT of Fallout over the years in multiple franchise titles.)

Even if you aren't a gamer, I would recommend the series. Production design is top tier. I am slowly working my way through season one (to make it last a while vs. binge watching) and it has been remarkably entertaining. It features some fairly extreme violence (which is sort of cartoon-ish, since it is based on a video game.) Not sure how you feel about that?

The acting has been solid, and the world building is very engaging. Repeating myself, definitely recommended.

- Walter.
Thanks Walter! On your recommendation, I will give it a spin.
 

Walter Kittel

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 28, 1998
Messages
9,813
Viewed episode three earlier today. Still holding up really well. It was interesting to see a denizen of Far Harbor (one of the the Fallout 4 game DLCs) in California. :)

One of the more interesting things about the series is how it is emphasizing that the brutal nature of the world above ground will change a person. This was touched on by Wilzig (Emerson) in episode two when he warned Lucy that she would need to adapt to survive. We see this personified in Cooper's persona before the bombs fell vs. the current timeline. I also enjoyed the personal growth that Maximus exhibited in this episode by turning away from his baser instincts.

We get more of Cooper's back story in episode three and I think I know where this headed, but I'll keep my speculations to myself. If what I think is going to happen, does happen; well that explains a lot. :)

- Walter.
 

DaveF

Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
28,789
Location
Catfisch Cinema
Real Name
Dave
Finally started Fallout this week! Only watched the first two episodes, so can’t catch up on the thread yet.

It’s been an about five years since I’ve played any Fallout and I forgot how violent it was. So I wasn’t anticipating how bloody it would be when I started watching with my wife. But she’s drawn in enough to deal with it (largely by covering her eyes and watching through her fingers). 😆

It’s enjoyable so far, if not nearly as amazing as The Last of Us. Fallout is giant, over the top, action/adventure but doesn’t have a resonant emotional core. It’s about the looks not the feels. And as such, it’s fun having a realization of this retro-future, post-nuclear wasteland world. I was hoping for more humor, building on the ‘50s camp from the games. But I guess Fallout (at least Fallout 3 & 4) aren’t really “funny” games, and are largely dark, dramatic, violent and tragic.
 

Adam Lenhardt

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2001
Messages
27,037
Location
Albany, NY
Fallout is giant, over the top, action/adventure but doesn’t have a resonant emotional core. It’s about the looks not the feels.
While it doesn't have the depth of character development and emotion of "The Last of Us", I will say that this show has a more resonant emotional core than the Fallout games. By the end of the season, Lucy MacLean and Cooper Howard, in particular, have really been put through the wringer.
 

Sam Posten

Moderator
Premium
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 30, 1997
Messages
33,733
Location
Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
Real Name
Sam Posten
Call it. Trust me.
IMG_1092.jpeg
 

Philip Verdieck

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 23, 1999
Messages
976
Location
Houston, TX
Real Name
Philip Verdieck
My apologies for the hit and run question, but I don't want to spoilerize myself by reading the thread.

How is Fallout? Are people enjoying it? I am shy about investing in a series if it sucks :) Any general opinions welcome! Thanks!
They completely nailed it. It is virtually impossible for them to have done better. Sure, there are a few minor inconsistencies but they are so trivial as to essentially be irrelevant.

If you placed said inconsistencies on a balancing scale, then placed everything they got right on the other side, it would launch the inconsistencies into the air.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,100
Messages
5,130,539
Members
144,287
Latest member
mattbuffalo
Recent bookmarks
0
Top