Adam Lenhardt
Senior HTF Member
The biggest discrepancy is the location, which has never been consistently portrayed. Fallout made it seem like it was in the middle of Death Valley. Fallout 2 showed it as being southwest of San Francisco, just on the other side of the Sierra Nevada. The show depicts it as being on the outskirts of Los Angeles's urban sprawl. My sense was that the skyscrapers in the distance were supposed to be pre-war skyscrapers from Los Angeles, while Shady Sands was more like a large town within visual range of Los Angeles.Yeah, I think the screwed that up.
It was implied it became a city with skyscrapers given the blast point and the surrounding buildings
They screwed that up. They couldn't have been pre-war buildings because Shady Sands was in the middle of nowhere, not created in an old metropolis. In 3 generations (Vault Dweller -> Vault Dweller grandchild) the difference between Shady Sands was size (one map -> 4 maps) and nothing exceeding a couple stories or build out of anything more than bricks and stone (and other low tech building materials).
The facts of Shady Sands's growth and fall tracked for me, given its status as the capital (at the time) of the New California Republic. Between Fallout (set primarily in 2161) and Fallout 2 (set primarily in 2241), Shady Sands went from being a small outpost housing a handful of extended families to the largest population center in the West, with 3,000 residents, and the New California Republic was the dominant power in the Southwest. According to the chalkboard in the Vault 4 classroom, Shady Sands got nuked in 2277, with the flashbacks we saw being shortly before and afterward. I can believe that roughly 28,000 people would be attracted to Shady Sands during those three and a half decades following Fallout 2, and that the hydroelectric power from the Hoover Dam would allow them to develop more infrastructure than most of the wasteland.