Originally Posted by John Hodson It's like they're talking right to me!
Originally Posted by John Hodson It's like they're talking right to me!
The above review made me want to take a chance on the better picture quality, plus the $10.99 price and 2-day free sipping, by using Amazon prime was another factor, plus I had enough Rewards points to cover the full cost . PaulJohn Hodson said:A general thumbs up from Blu-ray.com in their review
I've never seen that one but I have it on pre-order. Is it supposed to be a "so bad that it's good" type of film?GMpasqua said:Hmmm, I wonder how good the "Santa Claus" disc will look next week? Might pick it up if the reviews are good. Saw the film in a theater when I was 4 and it scared the S#$%@ out of me - hey when you're 4 - if you're gonna believe in Santa you're gonna believe in Satan This was one truly strange and bad film - but for the the nostalgia factor
You have to really love bad movies to enjoy it. For me, it's just painful but I understand why people get a kick out of it.Marvin said:I've never seen that one but I have it on pre-order. Is it supposed to be a "so bad that it's good" type of film?
The UK DVD is exactly the same (and if memory serves, recent TV broadcasts); like most everything else in their Rank library, VCI take what they are given by ITV Global. There's no doubt that by 1958, even in the UK, it would have been framed principally for widescreen projection.marsnkc said:Oh, great! I took delivery of the current Black Tent just last week......... I thought the days of starting out a film in widescreen (to cover the credits) and then devolving to pan and scan were long over, but that's what VCI did with their relatively recent 'Sea of Sand'. It's a terrific looking DVD, and the pan and scan is practically unnoticeable, leading me to think (hope) that it was actually filmed in 1:37 and matted for its 'official' widescreen ratio. Wouldn't want to miss a single mm. of the can't-go-wrong Attenborough.