DavidJ
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2001
- Messages
- 4,365
- Real Name
- David
Thanks for that link. It is a good read.
Spell corrected. Love typing on a phone that changes grammar.schan1269 said:Reminds me of the day a GF and I (long ago and not this one) agreed to say nothing but f*ck to each other all day.Amazing how much of a real conversation you can have using 1 word.
Not happening. Scorsese doesn't believe in releasing multiple cuts of his films.Michael Elliott said:I've heard rumors of a 4-hour version and if so I'm am so there.
I'm sure they did. If vocal MPAA critics like Wes Craven or Brian DePalma or even Oliver Stone had made that movie with an unknown actor, they would have had to take a chainsaw to it to get an R rating. They wouldn't have had to worry about getting it under 3 hours because they would have had to cut so much content that the movie would have ran like 35 minutes.Michael Elliott said:Did Scorsese/DiCaprio pull more weight?
I am very curious to know what you mean by this.Michael Elliott said:It's the same country who allows countless trash on television and those 16-year-old knocked up teens or dimwitted Jersey boys are just as big of thieves IMO.
Aaron Silverman said:I am very curious to know what you mean by this.
Who knows how much of this guy's story is accurate or embellished to make himself seem glamorous and (natch) to sell books. Either way, he doesn't seem particularly remorseful. His (dishonest) line is that he only targeted wealthy people, so "nobody lost their life savings." Oh, well, no problem then!
I wonder what his deal was for the movie rights. . .he may or may not be entitled to a cut of the profits and/ or residuals.