Carabimero
Senior HTF Member
Just glad they didn't cancel the McQuarrie book.
You won't regret it. And I don't regret buying it for $192. I'm not sure there will ever be a book I am as excited about ever again. And that is a considered statement.^ Not to rub it in but thanks for the heads up on the price. $150 is low enough to get me to go for it.
unfortunately you just have a terrible opening by Lucas in it.
I loved when Lucas said how even though the paintings are now adored by millions, they'd just toss them in the trunk of their cars to show them to ILM, etc. when they were making the movie. I enjoy thinking of the time when they were on their way to success but still had no idea of what incredible and influential thing they had come up with.So I'm not the only one who thinks that....
The rumor I heard was Lucas was unhappy with the way the transition and treatment of his stories for 7-9 were characterized. It was delayed while it was being rewritten and now he still isn't happy. But I haven't been able to substantiate that rumor.
As far as marketing timing, episode 7 is becoming less relevant every day that passes. I'd think they'd want the book out sooner so it could be doing business when the next movie hits.
I'm glad you got the book. I hope you are enjoying it as much as I am.I loved when Lucas said how even though the paintings are now adored by millions, they'd just toss them in the trunk of their cars to show them to ILM, etc. when they were making the movie. I enjoy thinking of the time when they were on their way to success but still had no idea of what incredible and influential thing they had come up with.
The question is: Who is the one with the torch?Nothing good comes from burning bridges.
If one believes the rumor, canceling the book is equivalent to keeping the torch unlit.The question is: Who is the one with the torch?
I don't know that I'd consider a Tweet to be good or bad news. Maybe Johnson is friends with Duncan Jones or maybe he's a big fan of his dad or maybe he just legitimately enjoyed the movie.
The strange thing is that inside "the Art of TFA" book sleeve, "The Making of TFA" is advertised but no name of J.W. Rinzler is mentioned. It's someone else.
Colin Cantwell was the first Star Wars hire by Lucas. Cantwell designed, among other things, the Y-Wing, the Death Star, and the Sand Crawler.
The deal for Star Wars was made when Lucas hired McQuarrie, but his paintings were essential for pre-production money to start flowing.
Fantastic post. Thanks for sharing your unique insight. It's appreciated.The initial deal for SW was in place long before Cantwell too - his stuff didn't make any difference except giving ILM a point of departure on the spacecraft. The McQuarrie stuff is what supported GL's later script which got the project officially more than just a development deal. The preprod money didn't even start properly flowing till dec 1975, which is why GL had to finance the first 6 months of ILM out of his own pocket.
I must have talked to more than a dozen ILMers back in 95 about the formation of the company for a Cinefex retrospective, (they only ran half the piece, couldn't sell enough ads for the issue!), and pretty much everyone there at the start cites McQ's work as what they believed reassured Fox while inspiring them artistically.
There's stuff in the MoSW Rinzler book that seems wonky to me ... more wonky about what ISN'T in the book, like ILM's week of shutdown in fall 1976, more than a year into their time on the film, when only a few shots were approved, and though I've tried contacting Rinzler several times, he has never responded. The only shutdown he mentions is a year earlier, something I admit I had never heard of, but outside of CFQ and my piece, I don't think anybody has even mentioned ILM getting shut down pretty much exactly at the time when they were hitting their stride. It's a pretty huge omission for a supposedly definitive work, and as a result it has cast aspersions on the veracity of the rest of Rinzler's book for me (haven't read the others.)