DavidAnthrope
Grip
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2004
- Messages
- 22
I've spent a week reading everything I could find here comparing the technologies, and I think I'm pointed in the right direction but wanted to solicit some comments just in case I'm missing something.
I have a 12x20 room, will be doing mostly DVD viewing and satellite-to-DVD recording - VERY little if any HD stuff. I'd like to get 60" and don't mind spending $4-5k. I ruled out front projection early on for various reasons. My primary criteria is picture quality, although the black bars and potential image burn are also concerns as well as maintainability. BUT I am absolutely NOT interested in hanging this unit on a wall, nor do I care about the coolness of the LCD & Plasma units being so thin etc...
So having a heavy/bulky unit like an rplcd or dlp is perfectly accepable, as it will sit on a stand with plenty of room.
I am currently considering projected lcd (rplcd if I understand the acronyms correctly). I am told that the quality of the picture will be every bit as good as a regular lcd. Do folks here agree? Please don't offer dated feedback (like the anti-plasma people seem to do with quoting the easily-burned early units). I'm talking new purchase -today- and presumably would get the newest stuff.
I was also told that they aren't susceptable to image burn, being lcd. And that the black is a true black.
So it sounds to me like anyone who doesn't mind the size/weight of the unit can get lcd quality for less money by going rplcd - is that correct?
Last but not least - are there advantages to one brand over another? More specifically, I've seen a Hitachi (2 actually) Ultra-Vision at 60" but I'm more inclined to go with the SONY Grand Wega (sorry I don't have model #'s but please feel free to offer them if you have experience with one).
Thanks in advance for any insight & wisdom you can share, there's a LOT of info to consider and I've been doing a lot of reading here. I think I've distilled it down, so I'm just looking for a little confirmation here if possible.
THANKS in advance and HAPPY NEW YEAR to everyone
/D
I have a 12x20 room, will be doing mostly DVD viewing and satellite-to-DVD recording - VERY little if any HD stuff. I'd like to get 60" and don't mind spending $4-5k. I ruled out front projection early on for various reasons. My primary criteria is picture quality, although the black bars and potential image burn are also concerns as well as maintainability. BUT I am absolutely NOT interested in hanging this unit on a wall, nor do I care about the coolness of the LCD & Plasma units being so thin etc...
So having a heavy/bulky unit like an rplcd or dlp is perfectly accepable, as it will sit on a stand with plenty of room.
I am currently considering projected lcd (rplcd if I understand the acronyms correctly). I am told that the quality of the picture will be every bit as good as a regular lcd. Do folks here agree? Please don't offer dated feedback (like the anti-plasma people seem to do with quoting the easily-burned early units). I'm talking new purchase -today- and presumably would get the newest stuff.
I was also told that they aren't susceptable to image burn, being lcd. And that the black is a true black.
So it sounds to me like anyone who doesn't mind the size/weight of the unit can get lcd quality for less money by going rplcd - is that correct?
Last but not least - are there advantages to one brand over another? More specifically, I've seen a Hitachi (2 actually) Ultra-Vision at 60" but I'm more inclined to go with the SONY Grand Wega (sorry I don't have model #'s but please feel free to offer them if you have experience with one).
Thanks in advance for any insight & wisdom you can share, there's a LOT of info to consider and I've been doing a lot of reading here. I think I've distilled it down, so I'm just looking for a little confirmation here if possible.
THANKS in advance and HAPPY NEW YEAR to everyone
/D